{
  "id": 6007,
  "title": "test data looks off",
  "url": "/competitions/yandex-personalized-web-search-challenge/discussion/6007",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2013-10-11T17:28:02.940Z",
  "votes": 1,
  "comment_count": 5,
  "views": 2365,
  "content": "<p>I haven't looked at the training data yet, but the test data seems formatted wrong for the &quot;M&quot; records.</p>\n<p>in the log file tab they are defined as</p>\n<p>SessionID Day TypeOfRecord USERID</p>\n<p>and an example is given like this</p>\n<p>744899 23 M 123123123</p>\n<p>but in the test data file I'm seeing</p>\n<p>34573630&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;M&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;28&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;15</p>\n<p>34573633&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;M&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;29&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;22</p>\n<p>34573634&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;M&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;28&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;27</p>\n<p>etc...</p>\n<p>&nbsp;</p>\n<p>I haven't checked the training file yet but I wager there is a similar problem there.. we could compensate for the mistake in the data load but it sure would be easier if you guys changed your data :) (hopeful look)</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "32260",
      "postDate": "10/11/2013 17:28:02",
      "content": "<p>I haven't looked at the training data yet, but the test data seems formatted wrong for the &quot;M&quot; records.</p>\n<p>in the log file tab they are defined as</p>\n<p>SessionID Day TypeOfRecord USERID</p>\n<p>and an example is given like this</p>\n<p>744899 23 M 123123123</p>\n<p>but in the test data file I'm seeing</p>\n<p>34573630&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;M&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;28&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;15</p>\n<p>34573633&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;M&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;29&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;22</p>\n<p>34573634&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;M&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;28&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;27</p>\n<p>etc...</p>\n<p>&nbsp;</p>\n<p>I haven't checked the training file yet but I wager there is a similar problem there.. we could compensate for the mistake in the data load but it sure would be easier if you guys changed your data :) (hopeful look)</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "32263",
      "postDate": "10/11/2013 18:05:34",
      "content": "<p>Hello,</p>\n<p>Thank you for the report! Indeed, there was a misalignment between the description and the dataset. We believe that at this point it is easier to fix the description.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "32267",
      "postDate": "10/11/2013 19:44:32",
      "content": "<p>Either this is a mistake or I don't understand:</p>\n<p>[quote]These records describe the session (SessionID = 744899) of the user with USERID 123123123, performed on the 23rd day of the dataset. The user submitted the query with QUERYID 192902, which contains terms with TermIDs 4857,3847,2939. <strong>The URL with URLID 632428 placed on the domain DomainID 2384 is the <em>top result</em></strong> on the corresponding SERP. 1403 units of time after beginning of the session the user clicked on <strong>the result with URLID 632428 (<em>ranked second</em> in the list)</strong>.[/quote]</p>\n<p>On&nbsp;http://www.kaggle.com/c/yandex-personalized-web-search-challenge/details/logs-format</p>\n<p>Shouldn't that be: (ranked first in the list).</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "32273",
      "postDate": "10/11/2013 20:29:42",
      "content": "<p>Triskelion, yes, 632428 is the top ranked URLID. Thanks for noticing, we'll fix the example.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "32828",
      "postDate": "10/29/2013 15:11:09",
      "content": "<p>In the test data set, why do some of the QueryAction records (i.e., lines with more than 5 fields) have TypeOfRecord = Q? There are 745,249 such lines.&nbsp; 797,867 of the QueryAction lines have TypeOfRecord = T which is the same as the number of Session metadata lines in that file.&nbsp; According to the documentation, &quot;T&nbsp;letter is used only for test queries.&quot;&nbsp; I don't understand why the &quot;Q&quot; lines occur in the test file.&nbsp;</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "32849",
      "postDate": "10/29/2013 18:23:45",
      "content": "<p>Test data contains not only test queries. There might be queries preceding the test one in a test session. They are not test queries and there is not need to re-rank documents for them. They are the context that you can use to re-rank documents for the test query.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 32263,
      "author_name": "eugene1751",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/11/2013 18:05:34",
      "content": "<p>Hello,</p>\n<p>Thank you for the report! Indeed, there was a misalignment between the description and the dataset. We believe that at this point it is easier to fix the description.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 32267,
      "author_name": "triskelion",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/11/2013 19:44:32",
      "content": "<p>Either this is a mistake or I don't understand:</p>\n<p>[quote]These records describe the session (SessionID = 744899) of the user with USERID 123123123, performed on the 23rd day of the dataset. The user submitted the query with QUERYID 192902, which contains terms with TermIDs 4857,3847,2939. <strong>The URL with URLID 632428 placed on the domain DomainID 2384 is the <em>top result</em></strong> on the corresponding SERP. 1403 units of time after beginning of the session the user clicked on <strong>the result with URLID 632428 (<em>ranked second</em> in the list)</strong>.[/quote]</p>\n<p>On&nbsp;http://www.kaggle.com/c/yandex-personalized-web-search-challenge/details/logs-format</p>\n<p>Shouldn't that be: (ranked first in the list).</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 32273,
      "author_name": "eugene1751",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/11/2013 20:29:42",
      "content": "<p>Triskelion, yes, 632428 is the top ranked URLID. Thanks for noticing, we'll fix the example.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 32828,
      "author_name": "ralphw",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/29/2013 15:11:09",
      "content": "<p>In the test data set, why do some of the QueryAction records (i.e., lines with more than 5 fields) have TypeOfRecord = Q? There are 745,249 such lines.&nbsp; 797,867 of the QueryAction lines have TypeOfRecord = T which is the same as the number of Session metadata lines in that file.&nbsp; According to the documentation, &quot;T&nbsp;letter is used only for test queries.&quot;&nbsp; I don't understand why the &quot;Q&quot; lines occur in the test file.&nbsp;</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 32849,
      "author_name": "serdyukovpv",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/29/2013 18:23:45",
      "content": "<p>Test data contains not only test queries. There might be queries preceding the test one in a test session. They are not test queries and there is not need to re-rank documents for them. They are the context that you can use to re-rank documents for the test query.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "32260": "",
    "32263": "",
    "32267": "",
    "32273": "",
    "32828": "",
    "32849": ""
  },
  "source": "meta"
}