{
  "id": 583763,
  "title": "Would someone work with me by sharing GPU?",
  "url": "/competitions/waveform-inversion/discussion/583763",
  "author_name": "Focus",
  "post_date": "2025-06-09T07:34:00.920000",
  "votes": 3,
  "comment_count": 10,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>I have two codes for this event. GPU on Kaggle only allows for nine hours which is insufficient. I hope someone having GPU will work with me. Is there anybody, please? </p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 3220349,
      "postDate": "2025-06-09T07:34:00.920Z",
      "content": "<p>I have two codes for this event. GPU on Kaggle only allows for nine hours which is insufficient. I hope someone having GPU will work with me. Is there anybody, please? </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I have two codes for this event. GPU on Kaggle only allows for nine hours which is insufficient. I hope someone having GPU will work with me. Is there anybody, please? ",
      "votes": 3
    },
    {
      "id": 3221749,
      "postDate": "2025-06-11T12:01:19.477Z",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://salad.com/pricing\" target=\"_blank\">https://salad.com/pricing</a><br>\n<a href=\"https://vast.ai/?gad_campaignid=20733719727\" target=\"_blank\">https://vast.ai/?gad_campaignid=20733719727</a><br>\nYou can rent a GPU cheaply using the website at the URL above</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "https://salad.com/pricing\nhttps://vast.ai/?gad_campaignid=20733719727\nYou can rent a GPU cheaply using the website at the URL above",
      "votes": 1
    },
    {
      "id": 3220782,
      "postDate": "2025-06-10T00:56:59.540Z",
      "content": "<p><img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F3736535%2F0a6d2e19631639f330f8a2ba170f0f7a%2Flocal_3days.png?generation=1749517526222321&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"\">Hello! I have 9 hours available this week, and I have a single 4090 GPU, so I can run things locally. How about teaming up and working together?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F3736535%2F0a6d2e19631639f330f8a2ba170f0f7a%2Flocal_3days.png?generation=1749517526222321&alt=media)Hello! I have 9 hours available this week, and I have a single 4090 GPU, so I can run things locally. How about teaming up and working together?",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 3220797,
          "postDate": "2025-06-10T01:51:41.587Z",
          "content": "<p>For a single 4090 GPU i do not know exactly necessary time for compute. <br>\nCan you run it about 10 days?<br>\nBecause 150 epochs take 8 days.<br>\nFrom one discussion:<br>\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/waveform-inversion/discussion/582785\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/waveform-inversion/discussion/582785</a></p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "For a single 4090 GPU i do not know exactly necessary time for compute. \nCan you run it about 10 days?\nBecause 150 epochs take 8 days.\nFrom one discussion:\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/competitions/waveform-inversion/discussion/582785",
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 3220815,
              "postDate": "2025-06-10T02:35:26.747Z",
              "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/overvalueawareness\" target=\"_blank\">@overvalueawareness</a> It depends on the code and performance. In my case, each epoch took around 3 hours.</p>",
              "rawMarkdown": "@overvalueawareness It depends on the code and performance. In my case, each epoch took around 3 hours.",
              "votes": -1
            },
            {
              "id": 3220828,
              "postDate": "2025-06-10T03:16:32.413Z",
              "rawMarkdown": "",
              "isDeleted": true
            },
            {
              "id": 3220833,
              "postDate": "2025-06-10T03:23:45.573Z",
              "content": "<p>Please check your email.</p>",
              "rawMarkdown": "Please check your email."
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": 3224325,
          "postDate": "2025-06-14T17:05:37.303Z",
          "content": "<p>How did you manage to achieve around 40 MAE after just a few epochs? Would you be willing to share the training parameters you used?</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "How did you manage to achieve around 40 MAE after just a few epochs? Would you be willing to share the training parameters you used?",
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 3224590,
              "postDate": "2025-06-15T06:12:44.560Z",
              "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/jamalsaeedi\" target=\"_blank\">@jamalsaeedi</a> I'm a beginner, so I wrote the code with the help of AI using publicly available sources. I'm not sure if it will be helpful, but please feel free to use it as a reference. </p>\n<p>I can share the training parameters and strategies used to achieve strong performance in Full Waveform Inversion tasks.</p>\n<h2><strong>Key Training Parameters Used</strong></h2>\n<h3><strong>Basic Configuration</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Learning Rate</strong>: 1×10⁻⁴ (no decay applied)[3]</li>\n<li><strong>Optimizer</strong>: AdamW with weight decay of 1×10⁻⁴[3]</li>\n<li><strong>Momentum Parameters</strong>: β₁ = 0.9, β₂ = 0.999[3]</li>\n<li><strong>Batch Size</strong>: 256 for training, 16 for validation[1][3]</li>\n<li><strong>Epochs</strong>: 120-200 epochs for full training[1][3]</li>\n<li><strong>Seed</strong>: 123 for reproducibility[1]</li>\n</ul>\n<h3><strong>Advanced Training Strategies</strong></h3>\n<p><strong>Ensemble Configuration:</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Backbone Models</strong>: CAFormer-B36 + ConvNeXt-Small[1]</li>\n<li><strong>EMA (Exponential Moving Average)</strong>: Enabled with decay of 0.99[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Dynamic Ensemble Weighting</strong>: Used for adaptive model combination[1]</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Data Augmentation:</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Mixup</strong>: Alpha = 0.2 for data mixing[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Extended TTA</strong>: 8-12 test-time augmentations[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Advanced augmentations</strong>: Elastic deformation, noise injection[1]</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Loss Function Improvements:</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Focal Loss</strong>: Alpha = 0.25, Gamma = 2.0[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Combined with standard L1 loss</strong>[4]</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Regularization Techniques:</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA)</strong>: Started at 75% of training[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Early Stopping</strong>: Patience of 3 epochs[1]</li>\n</ul>\n<h2><strong>Performance Optimization Strategies</strong></h2>\n<p>The approach used several key techniques to achieve rapid convergence[1]:</p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Pre-trained Backbones</strong>: Using models pre-trained on ImageNet22k</li>\n<li><strong>Multi-scale Training</strong>: Processing different resolution inputs</li>\n<li><strong>Geological Constraints</strong>: Velocity clamping between 1500-6500 m/s</li>\n<li><strong>Adaptive Post-processing</strong>: Confidence-weighted smoothing</li>\n</ol>\n<h2><strong>Dataset Context</strong></h2>\n<p>The training was conducted on the <strong>OpenFWI dataset</strong>, which contains[4][5]:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>470K training pairs</strong> across multiple geological structures</li>\n<li><strong>2D seismic data</strong>: 5×1000×70 dimensions</li>\n<li><strong>Velocity maps</strong>: 70×70 dimensions</li>\n<li><strong>Multiple complexity levels</strong>: Easy (A) and Hard (B) versions</li>\n</ul>\n<h2><strong>Expected Performance Gains</strong></h2>\n<p>The comprehensive strategy was designed to achieve[1]:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Dynamic ensemble weighting</strong>: 0.05-0.15 MAE improvement</li>\n<li><strong>Extended TTA</strong>: 0.03-0.08 MAE improvement</li>\n<li><strong>Advanced post-processing</strong>: 0.02-0.05 MAE improvement</li>\n<li><strong>Improved loss functions</strong>: 0.01-0.03 MAE improvement</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Total expected improvement</strong>: 0.12-0.33 MAE points beyond the baseline</p>\n<p>If you're seeing MAE values around 40 in early epochs, this likely represents the initial high error that rapidly decreases as the model learns the seismic-to-velocity mapping. The rapid convergence comes from using pre-trained features and the comprehensive training strategy outlined above.</p>\n<p>[1] paste.txt<br>\n[2] <a href=\"https://dataplatform.cloud.ibm.com/docs/content/wsj/analyze-data/fm-tuning-parameters.html?context=wx\" target=\"_blank\">https://dataplatform.cloud.ibm.com/docs/content/wsj/analyze-data/fm-tuning-parameters.html?context=wx</a><br>\n[3] <a href=\"https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/27d3ef263c7cb8d542c4f9815a49b69b-Supplemental-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/27d3ef263c7cb8d542c4f9815a49b69b-Supplemental-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.pdf</a><br>\n[4] <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/html/2412.19510v1\" target=\"_blank\">https://arxiv.org/html/2412.19510v1</a><br>\n[5] <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-68573-7\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-68573-7</a><br>\n[6] <a href=\"https://openreview.net/forum?id=0nJt9aVGtl\" target=\"_blank\">https://openreview.net/forum?id=0nJt9aVGtl</a><br>\n[7] <a href=\"https://scispace.com/pdf/openfwi-large-scale-multi-structural-benchmark-datasets-for-3rg477j7.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">https://scispace.com/pdf/openfwi-large-scale-multi-structural-benchmark-datasets-for-3rg477j7.pdf</a><br>\n[8] <a href=\"https://colab.research.google.com/drive/17s5JmVs9ABl8MpmFlhWMSslj9_d5Atfx?usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\">https://colab.research.google.com/drive/17s5JmVs9ABl8MpmFlhWMSslj9_d5Atfx?usp=sharing</a><br>\n[9] <a href=\"https://openfwi-lanl.github.io/tutorial/\" target=\"_blank\">https://openfwi-lanl.github.io/tutorial/</a><br>\n[10] <a href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39198496/\" target=\"_blank\">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39198496/</a><br>\n[11] <a href=\"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/generative-ai/fine-tuning-parameters.htm\" target=\"_blank\">https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/generative-ai/fine-tuning-parameters.htm</a></p>",
              "rawMarkdown": "@jamalsaeedi I'm a beginner, so I wrote the code with the help of AI using publicly available sources. I'm not sure if it will be helpful, but please feel free to use it as a reference. \n\nI can share the training parameters and strategies used to achieve strong performance in Full Waveform Inversion tasks.\n\n## **Key Training Parameters Used**\n\n### **Basic Configuration**\n- **Learning Rate**: 1×10⁻⁴ (no decay applied)[3]\n- **Optimizer**: AdamW with weight decay of 1×10⁻⁴[3]\n- **Momentum Parameters**: β₁ = 0.9, β₂ = 0.999[3]\n- **Batch Size**: 256 for training, 16 for validation[1][3]\n- **Epochs**: 120-200 epochs for full training[1][3]\n- **Seed**: 123 for reproducibility[1]\n\n### **Advanced Training Strategies**\n\n**Ensemble Configuration:**\n- **Backbone Models**: CAFormer-B36 + ConvNeXt-Small[1]\n- **EMA (Exponential Moving Average)**: Enabled with decay of 0.99[1]\n- **Dynamic Ensemble Weighting**: Used for adaptive model combination[1]\n\n**Data Augmentation:**\n- **Mixup**: Alpha = 0.2 for data mixing[1]\n- **Extended TTA**: 8-12 test-time augmentations[1]\n- **Advanced augmentations**: Elastic deformation, noise injection[1]\n\n**Loss Function Improvements:**\n- **Focal Loss**: Alpha = 0.25, Gamma = 2.0[1]\n- **Combined with standard L1 loss**[4]\n\n**Regularization Techniques:**\n- **Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA)**: Started at 75% of training[1]\n- **Early Stopping**: Patience of 3 epochs[1]\n\n## **Performance Optimization Strategies**\n\nThe approach used several key techniques to achieve rapid convergence[1]:\n\n1. **Pre-trained Backbones**: Using models pre-trained on ImageNet22k\n2. **Multi-scale Training**: Processing different resolution inputs\n3. **Geological Constraints**: Velocity clamping between 1500-6500 m/s\n4. **Adaptive Post-processing**: Confidence-weighted smoothing\n\n## **Dataset Context**\n\nThe training was conducted on the **OpenFWI dataset**, which contains[4][5]:\n- **470K training pairs** across multiple geological structures\n- **2D seismic data**: 5×1000×70 dimensions\n- **Velocity maps**: 70×70 dimensions\n- **Multiple complexity levels**: Easy (A) and Hard (B) versions\n\n## **Expected Performance Gains**\n\nThe comprehensive strategy was designed to achieve[1]:\n- **Dynamic ensemble weighting**: 0.05-0.15 MAE improvement\n- **Extended TTA**: 0.03-0.08 MAE improvement\n- **Advanced post-processing**: 0.02-0.05 MAE improvement\n- **Improved loss functions**: 0.01-0.03 MAE improvement\n\n**Total expected improvement**: 0.12-0.33 MAE points beyond the baseline\n\nIf you're seeing MAE values around 40 in early epochs, this likely represents the initial high error that rapidly decreases as the model learns the seismic-to-velocity mapping. The rapid convergence comes from using pre-trained features and the comprehensive training strategy outlined above.\n\n[1] paste.txt\n[2] https://dataplatform.cloud.ibm.com/docs/content/wsj/analyze-data/fm-tuning-parameters.html?context=wx\n[3] https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/27d3ef263c7cb8d542c4f9815a49b69b-Supplemental-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.pdf\n[4] https://arxiv.org/html/2412.19510v1\n[5] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-68573-7\n[6] https://openreview.net/forum?id=0nJt9aVGtl\n[7] https://scispace.com/pdf/openfwi-large-scale-multi-structural-benchmark-datasets-for-3rg477j7.pdf\n[8] https://colab.research.google.com/drive/17s5JmVs9ABl8MpmFlhWMSslj9_d5Atfx?usp=sharing\n[9] https://openfwi-lanl.github.io/tutorial/\n[10] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39198496/\n[11] https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/generative-ai/fine-tuning-parameters.htm",
              "votes": -1
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 3220647,
      "postDate": "2025-06-09T16:57:36.730Z",
      "content": "<p>you have 30 hours of gPU per week on Kaggle, not 9.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "you have 30 hours of gPU per week on Kaggle, not 9.",
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 3220699,
          "postDate": "2025-06-09T18:23:08.567Z",
          "rawMarkdown": "",
          "isDeleted": true
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 3221749,
      "author_name": "t fuku",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2025-06-11T12:01:19.477000",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://salad.com/pricing\" target=\"_blank\">https://salad.com/pricing</a><br>\n<a href=\"https://vast.ai/?gad_campaignid=20733719727\" target=\"_blank\">https://vast.ai/?gad_campaignid=20733719727</a><br>\nYou can rent a GPU cheaply using the website at the URL above</p>",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 3220782,
      "author_name": "Sung Heo",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2025-06-10T00:56:59.540000",
      "content": "<p><img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F3736535%2F0a6d2e19631639f330f8a2ba170f0f7a%2Flocal_3days.png?generation=1749517526222321&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"\">Hello! I have 9 hours available this week, and I have a single 4090 GPU, so I can run things locally. How about teaming up and working together?</p>",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 3220797,
          "author_name": "Focus",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2025-06-10T01:51:41.587000",
          "content": "<p>For a single 4090 GPU i do not know exactly necessary time for compute. <br>\nCan you run it about 10 days?<br>\nBecause 150 epochs take 8 days.<br>\nFrom one discussion:<br>\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/waveform-inversion/discussion/582785\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/waveform-inversion/discussion/582785</a></p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 3220815,
              "author_name": "Sung Heo",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "2025-06-10T02:35:26.747000",
              "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/overvalueawareness\" target=\"_blank\">@overvalueawareness</a> It depends on the code and performance. In my case, each epoch took around 3 hours.</p>",
              "votes": -1,
              "replies": []
            },
            {
              "id": 3220828,
              "author_name": "",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "2025-06-10T03:16:32.413000",
              "content": "",
              "votes": 0,
              "replies": []
            },
            {
              "id": 3220833,
              "author_name": "Focus",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "2025-06-10T03:23:45.573000",
              "content": "<p>Please check your email.</p>",
              "votes": 0,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": 3224325,
          "author_name": "Cyrus",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2025-06-14T17:05:37.303000",
          "content": "<p>How did you manage to achieve around 40 MAE after just a few epochs? Would you be willing to share the training parameters you used?</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 3224590,
              "author_name": "Sung Heo",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "2025-06-15T06:12:44.560000",
              "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/jamalsaeedi\" target=\"_blank\">@jamalsaeedi</a> I'm a beginner, so I wrote the code with the help of AI using publicly available sources. I'm not sure if it will be helpful, but please feel free to use it as a reference. </p>\n<p>I can share the training parameters and strategies used to achieve strong performance in Full Waveform Inversion tasks.</p>\n<h2><strong>Key Training Parameters Used</strong></h2>\n<h3><strong>Basic Configuration</strong></h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Learning Rate</strong>: 1×10⁻⁴ (no decay applied)[3]</li>\n<li><strong>Optimizer</strong>: AdamW with weight decay of 1×10⁻⁴[3]</li>\n<li><strong>Momentum Parameters</strong>: β₁ = 0.9, β₂ = 0.999[3]</li>\n<li><strong>Batch Size</strong>: 256 for training, 16 for validation[1][3]</li>\n<li><strong>Epochs</strong>: 120-200 epochs for full training[1][3]</li>\n<li><strong>Seed</strong>: 123 for reproducibility[1]</li>\n</ul>\n<h3><strong>Advanced Training Strategies</strong></h3>\n<p><strong>Ensemble Configuration:</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Backbone Models</strong>: CAFormer-B36 + ConvNeXt-Small[1]</li>\n<li><strong>EMA (Exponential Moving Average)</strong>: Enabled with decay of 0.99[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Dynamic Ensemble Weighting</strong>: Used for adaptive model combination[1]</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Data Augmentation:</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Mixup</strong>: Alpha = 0.2 for data mixing[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Extended TTA</strong>: 8-12 test-time augmentations[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Advanced augmentations</strong>: Elastic deformation, noise injection[1]</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Loss Function Improvements:</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Focal Loss</strong>: Alpha = 0.25, Gamma = 2.0[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Combined with standard L1 loss</strong>[4]</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Regularization Techniques:</strong></p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA)</strong>: Started at 75% of training[1]</li>\n<li><strong>Early Stopping</strong>: Patience of 3 epochs[1]</li>\n</ul>\n<h2><strong>Performance Optimization Strategies</strong></h2>\n<p>The approach used several key techniques to achieve rapid convergence[1]:</p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Pre-trained Backbones</strong>: Using models pre-trained on ImageNet22k</li>\n<li><strong>Multi-scale Training</strong>: Processing different resolution inputs</li>\n<li><strong>Geological Constraints</strong>: Velocity clamping between 1500-6500 m/s</li>\n<li><strong>Adaptive Post-processing</strong>: Confidence-weighted smoothing</li>\n</ol>\n<h2><strong>Dataset Context</strong></h2>\n<p>The training was conducted on the <strong>OpenFWI dataset</strong>, which contains[4][5]:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>470K training pairs</strong> across multiple geological structures</li>\n<li><strong>2D seismic data</strong>: 5×1000×70 dimensions</li>\n<li><strong>Velocity maps</strong>: 70×70 dimensions</li>\n<li><strong>Multiple complexity levels</strong>: Easy (A) and Hard (B) versions</li>\n</ul>\n<h2><strong>Expected Performance Gains</strong></h2>\n<p>The comprehensive strategy was designed to achieve[1]:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Dynamic ensemble weighting</strong>: 0.05-0.15 MAE improvement</li>\n<li><strong>Extended TTA</strong>: 0.03-0.08 MAE improvement</li>\n<li><strong>Advanced post-processing</strong>: 0.02-0.05 MAE improvement</li>\n<li><strong>Improved loss functions</strong>: 0.01-0.03 MAE improvement</li>\n</ul>\n<p><strong>Total expected improvement</strong>: 0.12-0.33 MAE points beyond the baseline</p>\n<p>If you're seeing MAE values around 40 in early epochs, this likely represents the initial high error that rapidly decreases as the model learns the seismic-to-velocity mapping. The rapid convergence comes from using pre-trained features and the comprehensive training strategy outlined above.</p>\n<p>[1] paste.txt<br>\n[2] <a href=\"https://dataplatform.cloud.ibm.com/docs/content/wsj/analyze-data/fm-tuning-parameters.html?context=wx\" target=\"_blank\">https://dataplatform.cloud.ibm.com/docs/content/wsj/analyze-data/fm-tuning-parameters.html?context=wx</a><br>\n[3] <a href=\"https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/27d3ef263c7cb8d542c4f9815a49b69b-Supplemental-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/27d3ef263c7cb8d542c4f9815a49b69b-Supplemental-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.pdf</a><br>\n[4] <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/html/2412.19510v1\" target=\"_blank\">https://arxiv.org/html/2412.19510v1</a><br>\n[5] <a href=\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-68573-7\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-68573-7</a><br>\n[6] <a href=\"https://openreview.net/forum?id=0nJt9aVGtl\" target=\"_blank\">https://openreview.net/forum?id=0nJt9aVGtl</a><br>\n[7] <a href=\"https://scispace.com/pdf/openfwi-large-scale-multi-structural-benchmark-datasets-for-3rg477j7.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">https://scispace.com/pdf/openfwi-large-scale-multi-structural-benchmark-datasets-for-3rg477j7.pdf</a><br>\n[8] <a href=\"https://colab.research.google.com/drive/17s5JmVs9ABl8MpmFlhWMSslj9_d5Atfx?usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\">https://colab.research.google.com/drive/17s5JmVs9ABl8MpmFlhWMSslj9_d5Atfx?usp=sharing</a><br>\n[9] <a href=\"https://openfwi-lanl.github.io/tutorial/\" target=\"_blank\">https://openfwi-lanl.github.io/tutorial/</a><br>\n[10] <a href=\"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39198496/\" target=\"_blank\">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39198496/</a><br>\n[11] <a href=\"https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/generative-ai/fine-tuning-parameters.htm\" target=\"_blank\">https://docs.oracle.com/en-us/iaas/Content/generative-ai/fine-tuning-parameters.htm</a></p>",
              "votes": -1,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 3220647,
      "author_name": "CPMP",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2025-06-09T16:57:36.730000",
      "content": "<p>you have 30 hours of gPU per week on Kaggle, not 9.</p>",
      "votes": 0,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 3220699,
          "author_name": "",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2025-06-09T18:23:08.567000",
          "content": "",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "3220349": "I have two codes for this event. GPU on Kaggle only allows for nine hours which is insufficient. I hope someone having GPU will work with me. Is there anybody, please? ",
    "3221749": "https://salad.com/pricing\nhttps://vast.ai/?gad_campaignid=20733719727\nYou can rent a GPU cheaply using the website at the URL above",
    "3220782": "![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F3736535%2F0a6d2e19631639f330f8a2ba170f0f7a%2Flocal_3days.png?generation=1749517526222321&alt=media)Hello! I have 9 hours available this week, and I have a single 4090 GPU, so I can run things locally. How about teaming up and working together?",
    "3220647": "you have 30 hours of gPU per week on Kaggle, not 9."
  }
}