![\"\"](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F761268%2F1e9666c11e82227feba97cb002f2946a%2FScreenshot%202025-04-27%20at%2012.50.50AM.png?generation=1745696189758630&alt=media\")
\"A Unified Framework for Forward and Inverse Problems in Subsurface Imaging Using Latent Space Translations.\"
\nhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11247
\nhttps://github.com/KGML-lab/Generalized-Forward-Inverse-Framework-for-DL4SI
\n\"This work proposes a generalized framework to solve forward and inverse problems, utilizing the latent space. We also propose an invertible architecture for the OpenFWI dataset.\"
", "messages": [ { "id": 3187849, "postDate": "2025-04-26T16:08:20.280Z", "content": "\"A Unified Framework for Forward and Inverse Problems in Subsurface Imaging Using Latent Space Translations.\"
\nhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11247
\nhttps://github.com/KGML-lab/Generalized-Forward-Inverse-Framework-for-DL4SI
\n\"This work proposes a generalized framework to solve forward and inverse problems, utilizing the latent space. We also propose an invertible architecture for the OpenFWI dataset.\"
", "rawMarkdown": "\"A Unified Framework for Forward and Inverse Problems in Subsurface Imaging Using Latent Space Translations.\"\n\nhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11247\n\nhttps://github.com/KGML-lab/Generalized-Forward-Inverse-Framework-for-DL4SI\n\n\"This work proposes a generalized framework to solve forward and inverse problems, utilizing the latent space. We also propose an invertible architecture for the OpenFWI dataset.\"", "votes": 15 }, { "id": 3187947, "postDate": "2025-04-26T18:42:51.670Z", "content": "If it's SOTA let's see it beat 1st place
", "rawMarkdown": "If it's SOTA let's see it beat 1st place", "votes": 7 }, { "id": 3187971, "postDate": "2025-04-26T19:39:28.787Z", "content": "
\n\nAuthors moved from Fourier Neural Operator -> Unified Framework for Forward and Inverse
\n
\n\nAnyone tried Fourier Neural Operator ?
\n
\n", "rawMarkdown": "\n\n> Authors moved from **Fourier Neural Operator** -> **Unified Framework for Forward and Inverse**\n\n---\n\n> Anyone tried **Fourier Neural Operator** ?\n\n---\n\n> Why velocity normalized with **[T.MinMaxNormalize(2000, 6000)](https://github.com/KGML-lab/Generalized-Forward-Inverse-Framework-for-DL4SI/blob/main/dataset.py#L111)** in this paper ? " }, { "id": 3188735, "postDate": "2025-04-28T05:57:11.013Z", "content": "Why velocity normalized with T.MinMaxNormalize(2000, 6000) in this paper ?
\n
I tried one of their models for StyleB but it was only outputting in the range of 4000m/s to 5000m/s looks like it was only trained for that range on that model.
", "rawMarkdown": "I tried one of their models for StyleB but it was only outputting in the range of 4000m/s to 5000m/s looks like it was only trained for that range on that model.", "replies": [ { "id": 3188797, "postDate": "2025-04-28T08:09:38.107Z", "content": "@fahadalgorithm i also observed same -> (2000,6000) ~ 4000 T.MinMaxNormalize(2000, 6000) instead (1500,4500) ~ 3000 in this paper ?
\n\n", "rawMarkdown": "@fahadalgorithm i also observed same -> (2000,6000) ~ 4000 **[T.MinMaxNormalize(2000, 6000)](https://github.com/KGML-lab/Generalized-Forward-Inverse-Framework-for-DL4SI/blob/main/dataset.py#L111)** instead (1500,4500) ~ 3000 in this paper ?\n\n> => rescale your 4k-5k into [0, 1] as per [2000,6000] range, and then change to [1500,4500]=> it will align with OpenFWI (not yet tested from my side)", "votes": 1 } ] }, { "id": 3190537, "postDate": "2025-04-30T19:27:36.247Z", "rawMarkdown": "", "votes": -2, "isDeleted": true } ], "comments": [ { "id": 3187947, "author_name": "greySnow", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2025-04-26T18:42:51.670000", "content": "=> rescale your 4k-5k into [0, 1] as per [2000,6000] range, and then change to [1500,4500]=> it will align with OpenFWI (not yet tested from my side)
\n
If it's SOTA let's see it beat 1st place
", "votes": 7, "replies": [] }, { "id": 3187971, "author_name": "SeshuRaju 🧘♂️", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2025-04-26T19:39:28.787000", "content": "
\n\nAuthors moved from Fourier Neural Operator -> Unified Framework for Forward and Inverse
\n
\n\nAnyone tried Fourier Neural Operator ?
\n
\n", "votes": 0, "replies": [] }, { "id": 3188735, "author_name": "Fahd Alghanim", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2025-04-28T05:57:11.013000", "content": "Why velocity normalized with T.MinMaxNormalize(2000, 6000) in this paper ?
\n
I tried one of their models for StyleB but it was only outputting in the range of 4000m/s to 5000m/s looks like it was only trained for that range on that model.
", "votes": 0, "replies": [ { "id": 3188797, "author_name": "SeshuRaju 🧘♂️", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2025-04-28T08:09:38.107000", "content": "@fahadalgorithm i also observed same -> (2000,6000) ~ 4000 T.MinMaxNormalize(2000, 6000) instead (1500,4500) ~ 3000 in this paper ?
\n\n", "votes": 1, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 3190537, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2025-04-30T19:27:36.247000", "content": "", "votes": -2, "replies": [] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "3187849": "\"A Unified Framework for Forward and Inverse Problems in Subsurface Imaging Using Latent Space Translations.\"\n\nhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11247\n\nhttps://github.com/KGML-lab/Generalized-Forward-Inverse-Framework-for-DL4SI\n\n\"This work proposes a generalized framework to solve forward and inverse problems, utilizing the latent space. We also propose an invertible architecture for the OpenFWI dataset.\"", "3187947": "If it's SOTA let's see it beat 1st place", "3187971": "\n\n> Authors moved from **Fourier Neural Operator** -> **Unified Framework for Forward and Inverse**\n\n---\n\n> Anyone tried **Fourier Neural Operator** ?\n\n---\n\n> Why velocity normalized with **[T.MinMaxNormalize(2000, 6000)](https://github.com/KGML-lab/Generalized-Forward-Inverse-Framework-for-DL4SI/blob/main/dataset.py#L111)** in this paper ? ", "3188735": "I tried one of their models for StyleB but it was only outputting in the range of 4000m/s to 5000m/s looks like it was only trained for that range on that model.", "3190537": "" } }=> rescale your 4k-5k into [0, 1] as per [2000,6000] range, and then change to [1500,4500]=> it will align with OpenFWI (not yet tested from my side)
\n