{
  "id": 416951,
  "title": "[Help] Is there a problem with using quick submission as the final submission?",
  "url": "/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/416951",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2023-06-13T14:59:06.841394600Z",
  "votes": 1,
  "comment_count": 5,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>All the while, I used this code for my submission,  is there a problem with using quick submission as the final submission? I don't think there's a problem with this, but would like confirmation anyway, thanks</p>\n<pre><code>from pathlib import Path\nimport hashlib\n\ndata_root = ()\ntest_root = data_root()\ntest_mask = (test_root())\n\nwith test_mask() as f:\n    hash_md5 = hashlib(f())()\n\nfast_sub = hash_md5 == \nfast_sub\n</code></pre>\n<p>ref: <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/410985#:~:text=more_vert-,In%20my%20case%3A,-from%20pathlib%20import\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/410985#:~:text=more_vert-,In%20my%20case%3A,-from%20pathlib%20import</a></p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "2300992",
      "postDate": "06/13/2023 14:59:06",
      "content": "<p>All the while, I used this code for my submission,  is there a problem with using quick submission as the final submission? I don't think there's a problem with this, but would like confirmation anyway, thanks</p>\n<pre><code>from pathlib import Path\nimport hashlib\n\ndata_root = ()\ntest_root = data_root()\ntest_mask = (test_root())\n\nwith test_mask() as f:\n    hash_md5 = hashlib(f())()\n\nfast_sub = hash_md5 == \nfast_sub\n</code></pre>\n<p>ref: <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/410985#:~:text=more_vert-,In%20my%20case%3A,-from%20pathlib%20import\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/410985#:~:text=more_vert-,In%20my%20case%3A,-from%20pathlib%20import</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "All the while, I used this code for my submission,  is there a problem with using quick submission as the final submission? I don't think there's a problem with this, but would like confirmation anyway, thanks\n```\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport hashlib\n\ndata_root = Path(\"/kaggle/input/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection\")\ntest_root = data_root.joinpath(\"test\")\ntest_mask = sorted(test_root.glob(\"**/*.png\"))[0]\n\nwith test_mask.open(\"rb\") as f:\n    hash_md5 = hashlib.md5(f.read()).hexdigest()\n\nfast_sub = hash_md5 == \"0b0fffdc0e88be226673846a143bb3e0\"\nfast_sub\n```\nref: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/410985#:~:text=more_vert-,In%20my%20case%3A,-from%20pathlib%20import",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2301056",
      "postDate": "06/13/2023 15:37:48",
      "content": "<p>This is fine. Scoring-wise, all that matters is the full submission we run on the hidden test set.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "This is fine. Scoring-wise, all that matters is the full submission we run on the hidden test set.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2301060",
      "postDate": "06/13/2023 15:40:56",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for your confirmation</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks for your confirmation",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2301535",
      "postDate": "06/14/2023 02:31:29",
      "content": "<p>Just confirming, if a submission is getting a score on the public leaderboard we should be fine because private and public come from a single notebook run with fragment \"a\" and fragment \"b\" being the separate split?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Just confirming, if a submission is getting a score on the public leaderboard we should be fine because private and public come from a single notebook run with fragment \"a\" and fragment \"b\" being the separate split?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2301723",
      "postDate": "06/14/2023 06:08:20",
      "content": "<p>From my previous experience, yes</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "From my previous experience, yes",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2302430",
      "postDate": "06/14/2023 14:51:52",
      "content": "<p>Confirmed, yes</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Confirmed, yes",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2301056,
      "author_name": "wcukierski",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/13/2023 15:37:48",
      "content": "<p>This is fine. Scoring-wise, all that matters is the full submission we run on the hidden test set.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2301060,
          "author_name": "hesene",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "06/13/2023 15:40:56",
          "content": "<p>Thanks for your confirmation</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 2301535,
      "author_name": "ryches",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/14/2023 02:31:29",
      "content": "<p>Just confirming, if a submission is getting a score on the public leaderboard we should be fine because private and public come from a single notebook run with fragment \"a\" and fragment \"b\" being the separate split?</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2301723,
          "author_name": "hesene",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "06/14/2023 06:08:20",
          "content": "<p>From my previous experience, yes</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 2302430,
              "author_name": "wcukierski",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "06/14/2023 14:51:52",
              "content": "<p>Confirmed, yes</p>",
              "votes": null,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2300992": "All the while, I used this code for my submission,  is there a problem with using quick submission as the final submission? I don't think there's a problem with this, but would like confirmation anyway, thanks\n```\nfrom pathlib import Path\nimport hashlib\n\ndata_root = Path(\"/kaggle/input/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection\")\ntest_root = data_root.joinpath(\"test\")\ntest_mask = sorted(test_root.glob(\"**/*.png\"))[0]\n\nwith test_mask.open(\"rb\") as f:\n    hash_md5 = hashlib.md5(f.read()).hexdigest()\n\nfast_sub = hash_md5 == \"0b0fffdc0e88be226673846a143bb3e0\"\nfast_sub\n```\nref: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/410985#:~:text=more_vert-,In%20my%20case%3A,-from%20pathlib%20import",
    "2301056": "This is fine. Scoring-wise, all that matters is the full submission we run on the hidden test set.",
    "2301060": "Thanks for your confirmation",
    "2301535": "Just confirming, if a submission is getting a score on the public leaderboard we should be fine because private and public come from a single notebook run with fragment \"a\" and fragment \"b\" being the separate split?",
    "2301723": "From my previous experience, yes",
    "2302430": "Confirmed, yes"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}