We've updated the rules to clarify: \"You are allowed to depend on external software (not written by you), such as a software library, that precludes commercial use.\" Your own code will have to be released on a fully open source library (not precluding commercial use) though. Thanks for folks raising this in https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/407355
", "messages": [ { "id": "2262411", "postDate": "05/16/2023 23:04:26", "content": "We've updated the rules to clarify: \"You are allowed to depend on external software (not written by you), such as a software library, that precludes commercial use.\" Your own code will have to be released on a fully open source library (not precluding commercial use) though. Thanks for folks raising this in https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/407355
", "rawMarkdown": "We've updated the rules to clarify: \"You are allowed to depend on external software (not written by you), such as a software library, that precludes commercial use.\" Your own code will have to be released on a fully open source library (not precluding commercial use) though. Thanks for folks raising this in https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/407355", "votes": null }, { "id": "2321507", "postDate": "06/28/2023 16:17:55", "content": "First and foremost, I would like to extend my thanks to Kaggle for providing a platform that allowed me to enhance my knowledge and skills. Throughout the competition, I utilized a segmentation approach from the following source: \"https://www.kaggle.com/code/yoyobar/3d-resnet-baseline-inference.\" Additionally, I employed my own data preprocessing techniques, made minor modifications to the model, and conducted further training iterations. In the process, I also made certain adjustments to the post-processing methods. It is important to note that I did not share my code privately or engage in any form of plagiarism or intellectual property theft.
\nWhen the leaderboard was initially released, my performance ranked 24th out of 1289 participants based on the public test set. Upon the final evaluation using the test set, my ranking was 77th out of 1289 participants. However, a few days later, I discovered that my score had been invalidated. I am perplexed as to why this action was taken, and I am unsure how to proceed. This is the first time I have encountered such a situation, and I would greatly appreciate your assistance in clarifying the matter.
\nI understand that maintaining the integrity of competitions is of utmost importance, and I assure you that I have adhered to all the guidelines and regulations outlined by Kaggle. If there are any concerns or discrepancies regarding my submission, I am more than willing to address them promptly. It is my earnest desire to understand the reason behind the disqualification and, if possible, rectify any mistakes or misunderstandings that may have occurred.
\nThank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your response. Your guidance and clarification would be greatly appreciated.
@youchen2ai review and fill out https://www.kaggle.com/compliance if you believe you were wrongly identified as having violated the rules
", "rawMarkdown": "youchen2ai review and fill out https://www.kaggle.com/compliance if you believe you were wrongly identified as having violated the rules", "votes": null } ], "comments": [ { "id": 2321507, "author_name": "youchen2ai", "author_url": "", "post_date": "06/28/2023 16:17:55", "content": "First and foremost, I would like to extend my thanks to Kaggle for providing a platform that allowed me to enhance my knowledge and skills. Throughout the competition, I utilized a segmentation approach from the following source: \"https://www.kaggle.com/code/yoyobar/3d-resnet-baseline-inference.\" Additionally, I employed my own data preprocessing techniques, made minor modifications to the model, and conducted further training iterations. In the process, I also made certain adjustments to the post-processing methods. It is important to note that I did not share my code privately or engage in any form of plagiarism or intellectual property theft.
\nWhen the leaderboard was initially released, my performance ranked 24th out of 1289 participants based on the public test set. Upon the final evaluation using the test set, my ranking was 77th out of 1289 participants. However, a few days later, I discovered that my score had been invalidated. I am perplexed as to why this action was taken, and I am unsure how to proceed. This is the first time I have encountered such a situation, and I would greatly appreciate your assistance in clarifying the matter.
\nI understand that maintaining the integrity of competitions is of utmost importance, and I assure you that I have adhered to all the guidelines and regulations outlined by Kaggle. If there are any concerns or discrepancies regarding my submission, I am more than willing to address them promptly. It is my earnest desire to understand the reason behind the disqualification and, if possible, rectify any mistakes or misunderstandings that may have occurred.
\nThank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your response. Your guidance and clarification would be greatly appreciated.
@youchen2ai review and fill out https://www.kaggle.com/compliance if you believe you were wrongly identified as having violated the rules
", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "2262411": "We've updated the rules to clarify: \"You are allowed to depend on external software (not written by you), such as a software library, that precludes commercial use.\" Your own code will have to be released on a fully open source library (not precluding commercial use) though. Thanks for folks raising this in https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/vesuvius-challenge-ink-detection/discussion/407355", "2321507": "First and foremost, I would like to extend my thanks to Kaggle for providing a platform that allowed me to enhance my knowledge and skills. Throughout the competition, I utilized a segmentation approach from the following source: \"https://www.kaggle.com/code/yoyobar/3d-resnet-baseline-inference.\" Additionally, I employed my own data preprocessing techniques, made minor modifications to the model, and conducted further training iterations. In the process, I also made certain adjustments to the post-processing methods. It is important to note that I did not share my code privately or engage in any form of plagiarism or intellectual property theft.\nWhen the leaderboard was initially released, my performance ranked 24th out of 1289 participants based on the public test set. Upon the final evaluation using the test set, my ranking was 77th out of 1289 participants. However, a few days later, I discovered that my score had been invalidated. I am perplexed as to why this action was taken, and I am unsure how to proceed. This is the first time I have encountered such a situation, and I would greatly appreciate your assistance in clarifying the matter.\nI understand that maintaining the integrity of competitions is of utmost importance, and I assure you that I have adhered to all the guidelines and regulations outlined by Kaggle. If there are any concerns or discrepancies regarding my submission, I am more than willing to address them promptly. It is my earnest desire to understand the reason behind the disqualification and, if possible, rectify any mistakes or misunderstandings that may have occurred.\nThank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to your response. Your guidance and clarification would be greatly appreciated.", "2321603": "youchen2ai review and fill out https://www.kaggle.com/compliance if you believe you were wrongly identified as having violated the rules" }, "source": "meta" }