\nThank you for the prompt fix response. However, upon checking, it appears that the inklabels.png for Fragment 2 is incorrect. Could you please verify it?
\n
![\"\"](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F611870%2Fbcc4712f4c8024cc6e6c2d784a662d68%2Fimage.png?generation=1682456068645944&alt=media\")
Hi everyone,
\nWe've updated the inklabels.png files in the training data to clean up some artifacts and ambiguities. The changes are fairly minor and don't affect the test set in any way.
Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.
", "messages": [ { "id": "2235209", "postDate": "04/25/2023 20:20:01", "content": "Hi everyone,
\nWe've updated the inklabels.png files in the training data to clean up some artifacts and ambiguities. The changes are fairly minor and don't affect the test set in any way.
Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.
", "rawMarkdown": "Hi everyone,\n\nWe've updated the `inklabels.png` files in the training data to clean up some artifacts and ambiguities. The changes are fairly minor and don't affect the test set in any way.\n\nPlease let us know if you have any questions or concerns.", "votes": null }, { "id": "2235231", "postDate": "04/25/2023 20:54:54", "content": "@ryanholbrook
\nThank you for the prompt fix response. However, upon checking, it appears that the inklabels.png for Fragment 2 is incorrect. Could you please verify it?
\n
Thanks @tmyok1984 , An update should be up shortly.
", "rawMarkdown": "Thanks @tmyok1984 , An update should be up shortly.", "votes": null }, { "id": "2235592", "postDate": "04/26/2023 07:11:51", "content": "That's great. I guess you have double-checked the test dataset and haven't found any issues so far?
", "rawMarkdown": "That's great. I guess you have double-checked the test dataset and haven't found any issues so far?", "votes": null }, { "id": "2237330", "postDate": "04/27/2023 14:37:34", "content": "Has it been updated?
", "rawMarkdown": "Has it been updated?", "votes": null }, { "id": "2237691", "postDate": "04/27/2023 21:39:02", "content": "Yes! The issue was resolved that day
", "rawMarkdown": "Yes! The issue was resolved that day", "votes": null }, { "id": "2238090", "postDate": "04/28/2023 07:49:49", "content": "Thanks for the information.
", "rawMarkdown": "Thanks for the information.", "votes": null }, { "id": "2240165", "postDate": "04/30/2023 09:32:49", "content": "shouldnt inklabels 2 be more like this?
\n(the hat of é or whatever it is)
Hey @ryanholbrook , sorry I'm quite late to ask this; long story. 🙂
\nIt seems like the update to Fragment 3 wasn't also propagated to the inklabels_rle.csv file for it, which is still identical to what it was before the update.
Not a huge issue, as most will likely be using inklabels.png rather than inklabels_rle.csv, but I was using your redundant formats of the ink labels as consistency checks in my code to make sure that I was processing the RLE format correctly.
(And thanks for the updates!)
", "rawMarkdown": "Hey @ryanholbrook , sorry I'm quite late to ask this; long story. 🙂\n\nIt seems like the update to Fragment 3 wasn't also propagated to the `inklabels_rle.csv` file for it, which is still identical to what it was before the update.\n\nNot a huge issue, as most will likely be using `inklabels.png` rather than `inklabels_rle.csv`, but I was using your redundant formats of the ink labels as consistency checks in my code to make sure that I was processing the RLE format correctly.\n\n(And thanks for the updates!)", "votes": null }, { "id": "2245007", "postDate": "05/04/2023 04:53:11", "content": "Ah sorry, I should have said that all three inklabels_rle.csv files were not updated—Fragment 3 just happened to throw first. 🙂
Hi @costella , good catch. I'll update the inklabels_rle.csv too.
@ryanholbrook
\nThank you for the prompt fix response. However, upon checking, it appears that the inklabels.png for Fragment 2 is incorrect. Could you please verify it?
\n
Thanks @tmyok1984 , An update should be up shortly.
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 2237330, "author_name": "yassinealouini", "author_url": "", "post_date": "04/27/2023 14:37:34", "content": "Has it been updated?
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 2237691, "author_name": "r1chardson", "author_url": "", "post_date": "04/27/2023 21:39:02", "content": "Yes! The issue was resolved that day
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 2238090, "author_name": "yassinealouini", "author_url": "", "post_date": "04/28/2023 07:49:49", "content": "Thanks for the information.
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 2240165, "author_name": "iraqbot", "author_url": "", "post_date": "04/30/2023 09:32:49", "content": "shouldnt inklabels 2 be more like this?
\n(the hat of é or whatever it is)
That's great. I guess you have double-checked the test dataset and haven't found any issues so far?
", "votes": null, "replies": [] }, { "id": 2245003, "author_name": "costella", "author_url": "", "post_date": "05/04/2023 04:48:16", "content": "Hey @ryanholbrook , sorry I'm quite late to ask this; long story. 🙂
\nIt seems like the update to Fragment 3 wasn't also propagated to the inklabels_rle.csv file for it, which is still identical to what it was before the update.
Not a huge issue, as most will likely be using inklabels.png rather than inklabels_rle.csv, but I was using your redundant formats of the ink labels as consistency checks in my code to make sure that I was processing the RLE format correctly.
(And thanks for the updates!)
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 2245007, "author_name": "costella", "author_url": "", "post_date": "05/04/2023 04:53:11", "content": "Ah sorry, I should have said that all three inklabels_rle.csv files were not updated—Fragment 3 just happened to throw first. 🙂
Hi @costella , good catch. I'll update the inklabels_rle.csv too.