{
  "id": 56088,
  "title": "hit_id ordering",
  "url": "/competitions/trackml-particle-identification/discussion/56088",
  "author_name": "Scott Starsman",
  "post_date": "2018-05-05T20:53:38.258000",
  "votes": 0,
  "comment_count": 0,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>I started making the assumption that the hit_ids for any one particle would be time ordered. It appears that's usually true but not always. I have found a few exceptions such as particle 4504011944230910 in the training sample. Some of its hit_ids don't go in order. Is this correct or is there an issue with that particle?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 323674,
      "postDate": "2018-05-05T20:53:38.260Z",
      "content": "<p>I started making the assumption that the hit_ids for any one particle would be time ordered. It appears that's usually true but not always. I have found a few exceptions such as particle 4504011944230910 in the training sample. Some of its hit_ids don't go in order. Is this correct or is there an issue with that particle?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I started making the assumption that the hit_ids for any one particle would be time ordered. It appears that's usually true but not always. I have found a few exceptions such as particle 4504011944230910 in the training sample. Some of its hit_ids don't go in order. Is this correct or is there an issue with that particle?\n"
    }
  ],
  "comments": [],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "323674": "I started making the assumption that the hit_ids for any one particle would be time ordered. It appears that's usually true but not always. I have found a few exceptions such as particle 4504011944230910 in the training sample. Some of its hit_ids don't go in order. Is this correct or is there an issue with that particle?\n"
  }
}