{
  "id": 55902,
  "title": "Conventional Algorithms",
  "url": "/competitions/trackml-particle-identification/discussion/55902",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2018-05-03T00:45:45.972962200Z",
  "votes": null,
  "comment_count": 6,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>The awards tab mentions: “...with respect to the traditional particle physics combinatorial approach...”. As this appears to be crucial to final ranking, can you point to a (hopefully brief) turtorial or description of the combinatorial approach?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "322453",
      "postDate": "05/03/2018 00:45:45",
      "content": "<p>The awards tab mentions: “...with respect to the traditional particle physics combinatorial approach...”. As this appears to be crucial to final ranking, can you point to a (hopefully brief) turtorial or description of the combinatorial approach?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "The awards tab mentions: “...with respect to the traditional particle physics combinatorial approach...”. As this appears to be crucial to final ranking, can you point to a (hopefully brief) turtorial or description of the combinatorial approach?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "322460",
      "postDate": "05/03/2018 01:56:03",
      "content": "<p>Hey pete, check out <a href=\"https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tW0tSJAgPJlQOwoSQPG7mtzDd-08F4z1/view\">page 20 of this talk</a>. I found it via <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/trackml-particle-identification/discussion/55726#321441\">this Kaggle discussion</a>, posted by David Rousseau, one of the challenge creators.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hey pete, check out [page 20 of this talk][1]. I found it via [this Kaggle discussion][2], posted by David Rousseau, one of the challenge creators.\n\n\n  [1]: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tW0tSJAgPJlQOwoSQPG7mtzDd-08F4z1/view\n  [2]: https://www.kaggle.com/c/trackml-particle-identification/discussion/55726#321441",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "322477",
      "postDate": "05/03/2018 03:06:17",
      "content": "<p>I read that the organisers will release basline code for hough transform and dbscan later. Let me know if i am wrong.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I read that the organisers will release basline code for hough transform and dbscan later. Let me know if i am wrong.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "322533",
      "postDate": "05/03/2018 06:24:29",
      "content": "<p>The applied method in the two main experiment at the LHC is conceptional very simple:\n- build track seeds from points of three\n- run a (combinatorial) Kalman Filter to complete your trajectories</p>\n\n<p>Quite lengthy, but here is some background information:</p>\n\n<p>Cornelissen, T. et al., <em>Concepts, Design and Implementation of the ATLAS New Tracking (NEWT)</em>, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2007-007, <a href=\"https://cds.cern.ch/record/1020106\">https://cds.cern.ch/record/1020106</a></p>\n\n<p>Adam, W. et al., <em>Track reconstruction in the CMS tracker</em>, CERN-CMS-NOTE-2006-041, CMS-NOTE-2006-041</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "The applied method in the two main experiment at the LHC is conceptional very simple:\n- build track seeds from points of three\n- run a (combinatorial) Kalman Filter to complete your trajectories\n\nQuite lengthy, but here is some background information:\n\n Cornelissen, T. et al., *Concepts, Design and Implementation of the ATLAS New Tracking (NEWT)*, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2007-007, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1020106\n\nAdam, W. et al., *Track reconstruction in the CMS tracker*, CERN-CMS-NOTE-2006-041, CMS-NOTE-2006-041",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "322545",
      "postDate": "05/03/2018 06:59:54",
      "content": "<p>Thanks - very helpful.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks - very helpful.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "322546",
      "postDate": "05/03/2018 07:02:02",
      "content": "<p>OK that makes sense. I guess you take every “sensible” three point combinations (that could possible be in a track) and run the Kalman filter on it.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "OK that makes sense. I guess you take every “sensible” three point combinations (that could possible be in a track) and run the Kalman filter on it.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "322548",
      "postDate": "05/03/2018 07:04:59",
      "content": "<p>Indeed - below 3 hits there's simply not enough degrees of freedom to constrain the trajectory.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Indeed - below 3 hits there's simply not enough degrees of freedom to constrain the trajectory.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 322460,
      "author_name": "jbonatt",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "05/03/2018 01:56:03",
      "content": "<p>Hey pete, check out <a href=\"https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tW0tSJAgPJlQOwoSQPG7mtzDd-08F4z1/view\">page 20 of this talk</a>. I found it via <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/trackml-particle-identification/discussion/55726#321441\">this Kaggle discussion</a>, posted by David Rousseau, one of the challenge creators.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 322545,
          "author_name": "petewills",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "05/03/2018 06:59:54",
          "content": "<p>Thanks - very helpful.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 322477,
      "author_name": "hengck23",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "05/03/2018 03:06:17",
      "content": "<p>I read that the organisers will release basline code for hough transform and dbscan later. Let me know if i am wrong.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 322533,
      "author_name": "asalzburger",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "05/03/2018 06:24:29",
      "content": "<p>The applied method in the two main experiment at the LHC is conceptional very simple:\n- build track seeds from points of three\n- run a (combinatorial) Kalman Filter to complete your trajectories</p>\n\n<p>Quite lengthy, but here is some background information:</p>\n\n<p>Cornelissen, T. et al., <em>Concepts, Design and Implementation of the ATLAS New Tracking (NEWT)</em>, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2007-007, <a href=\"https://cds.cern.ch/record/1020106\">https://cds.cern.ch/record/1020106</a></p>\n\n<p>Adam, W. et al., <em>Track reconstruction in the CMS tracker</em>, CERN-CMS-NOTE-2006-041, CMS-NOTE-2006-041</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 322546,
          "author_name": "petewills",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "05/03/2018 07:02:02",
          "content": "<p>OK that makes sense. I guess you take every “sensible” three point combinations (that could possible be in a track) and run the Kalman filter on it.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 322548,
          "author_name": "asalzburger",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "05/03/2018 07:04:59",
          "content": "<p>Indeed - below 3 hits there's simply not enough degrees of freedom to constrain the trajectory.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "322453": "The awards tab mentions: “...with respect to the traditional particle physics combinatorial approach...”. As this appears to be crucial to final ranking, can you point to a (hopefully brief) turtorial or description of the combinatorial approach?",
    "322460": "Hey pete, check out [page 20 of this talk][1]. I found it via [this Kaggle discussion][2], posted by David Rousseau, one of the challenge creators.\n\n\n  [1]: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tW0tSJAgPJlQOwoSQPG7mtzDd-08F4z1/view\n  [2]: https://www.kaggle.com/c/trackml-particle-identification/discussion/55726#321441",
    "322477": "I read that the organisers will release basline code for hough transform and dbscan later. Let me know if i am wrong.",
    "322533": "The applied method in the two main experiment at the LHC is conceptional very simple:\n- build track seeds from points of three\n- run a (combinatorial) Kalman Filter to complete your trajectories\n\nQuite lengthy, but here is some background information:\n\n Cornelissen, T. et al., *Concepts, Design and Implementation of the ATLAS New Tracking (NEWT)*, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2007-007, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1020106\n\nAdam, W. et al., *Track reconstruction in the CMS tracker*, CERN-CMS-NOTE-2006-041, CMS-NOTE-2006-041",
    "322545": "Thanks - very helpful.",
    "322546": "OK that makes sense. I guess you take every “sensible” three point combinations (that could possible be in a track) and run the Kalman filter on it.",
    "322548": "Indeed - below 3 hits there's simply not enough degrees of freedom to constrain the trajectory."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}