{
  "id": 409509,
  "title": "Unit unification and resampling",
  "url": "/competitions/tlvmc-parkinsons-freezing-gait-prediction/discussion/409509",
  "author_name": "Lingduo Wang",
  "post_date": "2023-05-11T11:17:07.851000",
  "votes": 0,
  "comment_count": 9,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Hello! </p>\n<p>According to the data description, the unit and sampling rate of defog and tdcsfog are inconsistent. I would like to ask if you have used unit unification and resampling?</p>\n<p>I think these two modules are very correct and should be able to produce positive results. But when I was experimenting, the results of these two modules were not optimistic. </p>\n<p>I would like to ask how you deal with units and sampling rates. </p>\n<p>Thank you for your attention! ;)</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 2256867,
      "postDate": "2023-05-12T19:43:27.390Z",
      "content": "<p>try using the data as is - most models will be just fine with it.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "try using the data as is - most models will be just fine with it.",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2257326,
          "postDate": "2023-05-13T08:56:16.780Z",
          "content": "<p>isn't it, in principle, equivalent of having two models?</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "isn't it, in principle, equivalent of having two models?",
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 2257708,
              "postDate": "2023-05-13T15:51:58.300Z",
              "content": "<p>Well, it depends on your feature engineering.<br>\nBut it doesn't have to be.</p>",
              "rawMarkdown": "Well, it depends on your feature engineering.\nBut it doesn't have to be."
            },
            {
              "id": 2259829,
              "postDate": "2023-05-15T09:03:14.250Z",
              "content": "<p>well, are you suggesting not \"using data as is\"? : )</p>",
              "rawMarkdown": "well, are you suggesting not \"using data as is\"? : )"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 2256012,
      "postDate": "2023-05-12T07:40:39.907Z",
      "content": "<p>my experience is also a worse score when unifying datasets and training a single model</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "my experience is also a worse score when unifying datasets and training a single model",
      "votes": 1
    },
    {
      "id": 2256274,
      "postDate": "2023-05-12T11:15:00.600Z",
      "content": "<p>It is surprising that two separate models do better than training with a single model for the tDCS and DeFOG datasets. My assumption is that a single model that works well on all 3 datasets will likely to be robust and perform well, avoiding overfitting.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "It is surprising that two separate models do better than training with a single model for the tDCS and DeFOG datasets. My assumption is that a single model that works well on all 3 datasets will likely to be robust and perform well, avoiding overfitting.",
      "votes": 2,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2257054,
          "postDate": "2023-05-13T01:06:52.207Z",
          "content": "<p>Thank you so much for your reply! I will try to train them separately with unit unification and resampling！:)</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "Thank you so much for your reply! I will try to train them separately with unit unification and resampling！:)"
        },
        {
          "id": 2259053,
          "postDate": "2023-05-14T16:50:10.837Z",
          "rawMarkdown": "",
          "isDeleted": true,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 2259171,
              "postDate": "2023-05-14T18:23:57.817Z",
              "content": "<p>The tilt correction method referred to in this paper (reference 16) might help to deal with some of these issues:<br>\n\"Therefore, a commonly used tilt correction procedure proposed by Moe-Nilssen et al. [16] was applied to all directions before the extraction of accelerometry-based features.\"  <br>\n<a href=\"https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7385\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7385</a>   Gerard Aristizábal Pla et al. (Sensors, 2021)</p>",
              "rawMarkdown": "The tilt correction method referred to in this paper (reference 16) might help to deal with some of these issues:\n\"Therefore, a commonly used tilt correction procedure proposed by Moe-Nilssen et al. [16] was applied to all directions before the extraction of accelerometry-based features.\"  \nhttps://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7385   Gerard Aristizábal Pla et al. (Sensors, 2021)",
              "votes": 4
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 2254950,
      "postDate": "2023-05-11T11:17:07.853Z",
      "content": "<p>Hello! </p>\n<p>According to the data description, the unit and sampling rate of defog and tdcsfog are inconsistent. I would like to ask if you have used unit unification and resampling?</p>\n<p>I think these two modules are very correct and should be able to produce positive results. But when I was experimenting, the results of these two modules were not optimistic. </p>\n<p>I would like to ask how you deal with units and sampling rates. </p>\n<p>Thank you for your attention! ;)</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hello! \n\nAccording to the data description, the unit and sampling rate of defog and tdcsfog are inconsistent. I would like to ask if you have used unit unification and resampling?\n\n I think these two modules are very correct and should be able to produce positive results. But when I was experimenting, the results of these two modules were not optimistic. \n\nI would like to ask how you deal with units and sampling rates. \n\nThank you for your attention! ;)"
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2256867,
      "author_name": "Aviv Levi",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2023-05-12T19:43:27.390000",
      "content": "<p>try using the data as is - most models will be just fine with it.</p>",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2257326,
          "author_name": "Alberto Annoni",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2023-05-13T08:56:16.780000",
          "content": "<p>isn't it, in principle, equivalent of having two models?</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 2257708,
              "author_name": "Aviv Levi",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "2023-05-13T15:51:58.300000",
              "content": "<p>Well, it depends on your feature engineering.<br>\nBut it doesn't have to be.</p>",
              "votes": 0,
              "replies": []
            },
            {
              "id": 2259829,
              "author_name": "Alberto Annoni",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "2023-05-15T09:03:14.250000",
              "content": "<p>well, are you suggesting not \"using data as is\"? : )</p>",
              "votes": 0,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 2256012,
      "author_name": "Alberto Annoni",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2023-05-12T07:40:39.907000",
      "content": "<p>my experience is also a worse score when unifying datasets and training a single model</p>",
      "votes": 1,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 2256274,
      "author_name": "Jeff Hausdorff",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2023-05-12T11:15:00.600000",
      "content": "<p>It is surprising that two separate models do better than training with a single model for the tDCS and DeFOG datasets. My assumption is that a single model that works well on all 3 datasets will likely to be robust and perform well, avoiding overfitting.</p>",
      "votes": 2,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2257054,
          "author_name": "Lingduo Wang",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2023-05-13T01:06:52.207000",
          "content": "<p>Thank you so much for your reply! I will try to train them separately with unit unification and resampling！:)</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 2259053,
          "author_name": "",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2023-05-14T16:50:10.837000",
          "content": "",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 2259171,
              "author_name": "Jeff Hausdorff",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "2023-05-14T18:23:57.817000",
              "content": "<p>The tilt correction method referred to in this paper (reference 16) might help to deal with some of these issues:<br>\n\"Therefore, a commonly used tilt correction procedure proposed by Moe-Nilssen et al. [16] was applied to all directions before the extraction of accelerometry-based features.\"  <br>\n<a href=\"https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7385\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/21/7385</a>   Gerard Aristizábal Pla et al. (Sensors, 2021)</p>",
              "votes": 4,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2256867": "try using the data as is - most models will be just fine with it.",
    "2256012": "my experience is also a worse score when unifying datasets and training a single model",
    "2256274": "It is surprising that two separate models do better than training with a single model for the tDCS and DeFOG datasets. My assumption is that a single model that works well on all 3 datasets will likely to be robust and perform well, avoiding overfitting.",
    "2254950": "Hello! \n\nAccording to the data description, the unit and sampling rate of defog and tdcsfog are inconsistent. I would like to ask if you have used unit unification and resampling?\n\n I think these two modules are very correct and should be able to produce positive results. But when I was experimenting, the results of these two modules were not optimistic. \n\nI would like to ask how you deal with units and sampling rates. \n\nThank you for your attention! ;)"
  }
}