{
  "id": 301728,
  "title": "What is the best solution for yolov5?",
  "url": "/competitions/tensorflow-great-barrier-reef/discussion/301728",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2022-01-19T05:36:22.241816100Z",
  "votes": 2,
  "comment_count": 11,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>I am using yolov5 for this project, but I am trying to figure out what model to use for training. However, I'm trying to decide what to use as a model to train on, because yolov5s is not very accurate, and yolov5x takes too much time and uses a lot of memory. It would be great if you could tell me what is the best balanced solution at the moment. By the way, I'm using Google colab+ for training.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "1656134",
      "postDate": "01/19/2022 05:36:22",
      "content": "<p>I am using yolov5 for this project, but I am trying to figure out what model to use for training. However, I'm trying to decide what to use as a model to train on, because yolov5s is not very accurate, and yolov5x takes too much time and uses a lot of memory. It would be great if you could tell me what is the best balanced solution at the moment. By the way, I'm using Google colab+ for training.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I am using yolov5 for this project, but I am trying to figure out what model to use for training. However, I'm trying to decide what to use as a model to train on, because yolov5s is not very accurate, and yolov5x takes too much time and uses a lot of memory. It would be great if you could tell me what is the best balanced solution at the moment. By the way, I'm using Google colab+ for training.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1656161",
      "postDate": "01/19/2022 06:04:27",
      "content": "<p>I using yolov5m, i think it's good enough to ~0.6 lb.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I using yolov5m, i think it's good enough to ~0.6 lb.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1656246",
      "postDate": "01/19/2022 07:52:54",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for the reply. I'm going to give it another try with yolov5m. I think the balance between computational cost and model accuracy is both difficult and interesting in this field. As long as I have the computational cost and the time until the deadline, I will not stop trying. By the way, are you planning to challenge with yolo5vl or yolo5vx?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks for the reply. I'm going to give it another try with yolov5m. I think the balance between computational cost and model accuracy is both difficult and interesting in this field. As long as I have the computational cost and the time until the deadline, I will not stop trying. By the way, are you planning to challenge with yolo5vl or yolo5vx?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1656603",
      "postDate": "01/19/2022 13:24:49",
      "content": "<p>Could share some advice?I am also use yolov5m.But the best score is 0.567.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Could share some advice?I am also use yolov5m.But the best score is 0.567.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1656863",
      "postDate": "01/19/2022 17:47:55",
      "content": "<p>How about yolov5m6, had you tried it?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "How about yolov5m6, had you tried it?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1657585",
      "postDate": "01/20/2022 10:01:52",
      "content": "<p>In my case, i try experiments on small model, test best suited hypeparamters and then try it on larger model. This is my first time on kaggle competition so i don't know much, but as a learner i only have an advice is run as much as possible experiments. 👍 (you should try other techniques like cross folding, ensembles, or tracking). have fun learning. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "In my case, i try experiments on small model, test best suited hypeparamters and then try it on larger model. This is my first time on kaggle competition so i don't know much, but as a learner i only have an advice is run as much as possible experiments. 👍 (you should try other techniques like cross folding, ensembles, or tracking). have fun learning.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1658445",
      "postDate": "01/21/2022 03:14:06",
      "content": "<p>There are many guys use yolo5s6, and also can get a good lb</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "There are many guys use yolo5s6, and also can get a good lb",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1658460",
      "postDate": "01/21/2022 03:40:30",
      "content": "<p>Do you have any suggestions on how to find the best hyperparameters? I tried evolution but it didn’t help. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Do you have any suggestions on how to find the best hyperparameters? I tried evolution but it didn’t help.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1659661",
      "postDate": "01/22/2022 03:16:17",
      "content": "<p>Oh, I see. I'd like to know how they improve the accuracy.😳</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Oh, I see. I'd like to know how they improve the accuracy.😳",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1660028",
      "postDate": "01/22/2022 10:28:11",
      "content": "<p>Very curious about how to use yolov5m6 to gain 0.6 LB, such amazing!</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Very curious about how to use yolov5m6 to gain 0.6 LB, such amazing!",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1660042",
      "postDate": "01/22/2022 10:49:32",
      "content": "<p>Agree, I'm still using yolov5s6😅, m6 performed better locally, but quite bad on the LB</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Agree, I'm still using yolov5s6😅, m6 performed better locally, but quite bad on the LB",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1680784",
      "postDate": "02/08/2022 03:03:05",
      "content": "<p>Are anchor boxes one of your tuned hyperparameters or you rely more on k-mean clustering readily available by ultralytics?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Are anchor boxes one of your tuned hyperparameters or you rely more on k-mean clustering readily available by ultralytics?",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1656161,
      "author_name": "locbaop",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "01/19/2022 06:04:27",
      "content": "<p>I using yolov5m, i think it's good enough to ~0.6 lb.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1656246,
          "author_name": "cahein1371",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "01/19/2022 07:52:54",
          "content": "<p>Thanks for the reply. I'm going to give it another try with yolov5m. I think the balance between computational cost and model accuracy is both difficult and interesting in this field. As long as I have the computational cost and the time until the deadline, I will not stop trying. By the way, are you planning to challenge with yolo5vl or yolo5vx?</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1656603,
          "author_name": "rishengyang",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "01/19/2022 13:24:49",
          "content": "<p>Could share some advice?I am also use yolov5m.But the best score is 0.567.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1656863,
          "author_name": "w3579628328",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "01/19/2022 17:47:55",
          "content": "<p>How about yolov5m6, had you tried it?</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1657585,
          "author_name": "locbaop",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "01/20/2022 10:01:52",
          "content": "<p>In my case, i try experiments on small model, test best suited hypeparamters and then try it on larger model. This is my first time on kaggle competition so i don't know much, but as a learner i only have an advice is run as much as possible experiments. 👍 (you should try other techniques like cross folding, ensembles, or tracking). have fun learning. </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1658460,
          "author_name": "ayu055",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "01/21/2022 03:40:30",
          "content": "<p>Do you have any suggestions on how to find the best hyperparameters? I tried evolution but it didn’t help. </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1660028,
          "author_name": "calvchen",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "01/22/2022 10:28:11",
          "content": "<p>Very curious about how to use yolov5m6 to gain 0.6 LB, such amazing!</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1660042,
          "author_name": "w3579628328",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "01/22/2022 10:49:32",
          "content": "<p>Agree, I'm still using yolov5s6😅, m6 performed better locally, but quite bad on the LB</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1680784,
          "author_name": "anhnhunhat",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "02/08/2022 03:03:05",
          "content": "<p>Are anchor boxes one of your tuned hyperparameters or you rely more on k-mean clustering readily available by ultralytics?</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1658445,
      "author_name": "ezkingt0t",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "01/21/2022 03:14:06",
      "content": "<p>There are many guys use yolo5s6, and also can get a good lb</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1659661,
          "author_name": "cahein1371",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "01/22/2022 03:16:17",
          "content": "<p>Oh, I see. I'd like to know how they improve the accuracy.😳</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1656134": "I am using yolov5 for this project, but I am trying to figure out what model to use for training. However, I'm trying to decide what to use as a model to train on, because yolov5s is not very accurate, and yolov5x takes too much time and uses a lot of memory. It would be great if you could tell me what is the best balanced solution at the moment. By the way, I'm using Google colab+ for training.",
    "1656161": "I using yolov5m, i think it's good enough to ~0.6 lb.",
    "1656246": "Thanks for the reply. I'm going to give it another try with yolov5m. I think the balance between computational cost and model accuracy is both difficult and interesting in this field. As long as I have the computational cost and the time until the deadline, I will not stop trying. By the way, are you planning to challenge with yolo5vl or yolo5vx?",
    "1656603": "Could share some advice?I am also use yolov5m.But the best score is 0.567.",
    "1656863": "How about yolov5m6, had you tried it?",
    "1657585": "In my case, i try experiments on small model, test best suited hypeparamters and then try it on larger model. This is my first time on kaggle competition so i don't know much, but as a learner i only have an advice is run as much as possible experiments. 👍 (you should try other techniques like cross folding, ensembles, or tracking). have fun learning.",
    "1658445": "There are many guys use yolo5s6, and also can get a good lb",
    "1658460": "Do you have any suggestions on how to find the best hyperparameters? I tried evolution but it didn’t help.",
    "1659661": "Oh, I see. I'd like to know how they improve the accuracy.😳",
    "1660028": "Very curious about how to use yolov5m6 to gain 0.6 LB, such amazing!",
    "1660042": "Agree, I'm still using yolov5s6😅, m6 performed better locally, but quite bad on the LB",
    "1680784": "Are anchor boxes one of your tuned hyperparameters or you rely more on k-mean clustering readily available by ultralytics?"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}