Hi Kagglers,
\nWe’re happy to announce the conclusion of the Stanford Ribonanza RNA Folding competition. Thank you everyone for your participation!
\nThis competition ended with 7599 registrations and 891 participants on 755 teams. We had 9814 submissions from 77 countries. For 150 users (including 13 in the top 100!), this was their first competition. Thank you all for your hard work in this competition and congratulations to our winners and to those who gained a new ranking!
\nThe top potential winning teams will be contacted via email for the next steps. We look forward to learning more about their winning solutions.
\nWe've cleaned the leaderboard and disqualified some teams that have violated the rules. If you think you were removed by mistake, or believe you have evidence that suggests another team cheated, please contact compliance. Please fill in all the fields honestly.
\nWe highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums. We’re awarding swag to the 50 teams with the most upvotes on their solution write-ups two weeks after the competition’s final submission deadline.
\nTo be eligible, the solution write-ups must be linked as an official writeup (see instructions) and the write-up should meet the criteria outlined in our new quality rubric. We’re using upvotes as a measure of quality and helpfulness, please be sure you keep this in mind when upvoting others' work. Evidence of upvote gaming will result in disqualification and/or account banning. Details can be found here.
\nThanks for continuing to make Kaggle a great place to learn, practice, and test data science techniques!
\nHappy Modeling!
\nKaggle Team
Hi Kagglers,
\nWe’re happy to announce the conclusion of the Stanford Ribonanza RNA Folding competition. Thank you everyone for your participation!
\nThis competition ended with 7599 registrations and 891 participants on 755 teams. We had 9814 submissions from 77 countries. For 150 users (including 13 in the top 100!), this was their first competition. Thank you all for your hard work in this competition and congratulations to our winners and to those who gained a new ranking!
\nThe top potential winning teams will be contacted via email for the next steps. We look forward to learning more about their winning solutions.
\nWe've cleaned the leaderboard and disqualified some teams that have violated the rules. If you think you were removed by mistake, or believe you have evidence that suggests another team cheated, please contact compliance. Please fill in all the fields honestly.
\nWe highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums. We’re awarding swag to the 50 teams with the most upvotes on their solution write-ups two weeks after the competition’s final submission deadline.
\nTo be eligible, the solution write-ups must be linked as an official writeup (see instructions) and the write-up should meet the criteria outlined in our new quality rubric. We’re using upvotes as a measure of quality and helpfulness, please be sure you keep this in mind when upvoting others' work. Evidence of upvote gaming will result in disqualification and/or account banning. Details can be found here.
\nThanks for continuing to make Kaggle a great place to learn, practice, and test data science techniques!
\nHappy Modeling!
\nKaggle Team
Thank you for hosting this competition.
\nI have learned so much!
This was my first serious trial of torch and DL. I have learned a freaking lot!
\nI hope to see more competitions like this (especially protein-related ones ;) )!
Thanks!
", "rawMarkdown": "This was my first serious trial of torch and DL. I have learned a freaking lot!\nI hope to see more competitions like this (especially protein-related ones ;) )!\n\nThanks!", "votes": 2 }, { "id": 2559595, "postDate": "2023-12-13T00:42:43.193Z", "content": "Hi, just a clarifying question here. What is the difference between a registrant and a participant? Is is just that a participant is someone who has made at least one submission, and a registrant as made none? Because there is a huge difference in the numbers.
", "rawMarkdown": "Hi, just a clarifying question here. What is the difference between a registrant and a participant? Is is just that a participant is someone who has made at least one submission, and a registrant as made none? Because there is a huge difference in the numbers.", "replies": [ { "id": 2559601, "postDate": "2023-12-13T00:48:59.337Z", "content": "Thanks @alberteinsten! Yes, correct. \"Registrations\" are the number of people who accepted the rules, while \"participants\" are the competitors in this competition. Thanks!
", "rawMarkdown": "Thanks @alberteinsten! Yes, correct. \"Registrations\" are the number of people who accepted the rules, while \"participants\" are the competitors in this competition. Thanks!", "votes": 1 } ] }, { "id": 2554047, "postDate": "2023-12-08T18:23:43.247Z", "rawMarkdown": "", "isDeleted": true } ], "comments": [ { "id": 2553083, "author_name": "neilus", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2023-12-08T02:06:53.213000", "content": "Thank you for hosting this competition.
\nI have learned so much!
This was my first serious trial of torch and DL. I have learned a freaking lot!
\nI hope to see more competitions like this (especially protein-related ones ;) )!
Thanks!
", "votes": 2, "replies": [] }, { "id": 2559595, "author_name": "Abhishek Shah", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2023-12-13T00:42:43.193000", "content": "Hi, just a clarifying question here. What is the difference between a registrant and a participant? Is is just that a participant is someone who has made at least one submission, and a registrant as made none? Because there is a huge difference in the numbers.
", "votes": 0, "replies": [ { "id": 2559601, "author_name": "Ashley Chow", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2023-12-13T00:48:59.337000", "content": "Thanks @alberteinsten! Yes, correct. \"Registrations\" are the number of people who accepted the rules, while \"participants\" are the competitors in this competition. Thanks!
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 2554047, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2023-12-08T18:23:43.247000", "content": "", "votes": 0, "replies": [] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "2553061": "Hi Kagglers,\n\nWe’re happy to announce the conclusion of the Stanford Ribonanza RNA Folding competition. Thank you everyone for your participation!\n\nThis competition ended with 7599 registrations and 891 participants on 755 teams. We had 9814 submissions from 77 countries. For 150 users (including 13 in the top 100!), this was their first competition. Thank you all for your hard work in this competition and congratulations to our winners and to those who gained a new ranking! \n\nThe top potential winning teams will be contacted via email for the next steps. We look forward to learning more about their winning solutions.\n\nWe've cleaned the leaderboard and disqualified some teams that have violated the rules. If you think you were removed by mistake, or believe you have evidence that suggests another team cheated, please contact [compliance](https://www.kaggle.com/compliance). Please fill in all the fields honestly.\n\nWe highly encourage you to post a solution write-up about your approach and solution in the forums. We’re awarding swag to the 50 teams with the most upvotes on their solution write-ups two weeks after the competition’s final submission deadline.\n\nTo be eligible, the solution write-ups must be linked as an official writeup (see [instructions](https://www.kaggle.com/discussions/product-feedback/373153)) and the write-up should meet the criteria outlined in our [new quality rubric](https://www.kaggle.com/solution-write-up-documentation). We’re using upvotes as a measure of quality and helpfulness, please be sure you keep this in mind when upvoting others' work. Evidence of upvote gaming will result in disqualification and/or account banning. Details can be found [here](https://www.kaggle.com/discussions/general/427114).\n\nThanks for continuing to make Kaggle a great place to learn, practice, and test data science techniques!\n\nHappy Modeling!\nKaggle Team\n", "2553083": "Thank you for hosting this competition.\nI have learned so much! ", "2553387": "This was my first serious trial of torch and DL. I have learned a freaking lot!\nI hope to see more competitions like this (especially protein-related ones ;) )!\n\nThanks!", "2559595": "Hi, just a clarifying question here. What is the difference between a registrant and a participant? Is is just that a participant is someone who has made at least one submission, and a registrant as made none? Because there is a huge difference in the numbers.", "2554047": "" } }