{
  "id": 239760,
  "title": "What's your best single model?",
  "url": "/competitions/seti-breakthrough-listen/discussion/239760",
  "author_name": "Chenglu",
  "post_date": "2021-05-17T14:56:18.112000",
  "votes": 14,
  "comment_count": 18,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>I want to see how far can we go with just one model(and for best one fold), or it's just a ensembling game.</p>\n<p>For me:</p>\n<p>model: efficientnet_b0<br>\nfold: trained on single fold (4/5 of the dataset)<br>\nlocal ROC AUC: 0.986<br>\npublic ROC AUC: 0.97 ( based on \"Score Sorting\", I guess it should be around ~ 0.977 )<br>\nTTA: no tta</p>\n<p>Edit:</p>\n<p>I have tried my best pipeline(above) with 5 folds to ensemble, the public score is better but does not achieve 0.98, so I think the naive ensemble(average) boost is small.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 1311691,
      "postDate": "2021-05-17T14:56:18.113Z",
      "content": "<p>I want to see how far can we go with just one model(and for best one fold), or it's just a ensembling game.</p>\n<p>For me:</p>\n<p>model: efficientnet_b0<br>\nfold: trained on single fold (4/5 of the dataset)<br>\nlocal ROC AUC: 0.986<br>\npublic ROC AUC: 0.97 ( based on \"Score Sorting\", I guess it should be around ~ 0.977 )<br>\nTTA: no tta</p>\n<p>Edit:</p>\n<p>I have tried my best pipeline(above) with 5 folds to ensemble, the public score is better but does not achieve 0.98, so I think the naive ensemble(average) boost is small.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I want to see how far can we go with just one model(and for best one fold), or it's just a ensembling game.\n\nFor me:\n\nmodel: efficientnet_b0\nfold: trained on single fold (4/5 of the dataset)\nlocal ROC AUC: 0.986\npublic ROC AUC: 0.97 ( based on \"Score Sorting\", I guess it should be around ~ 0.977 )\nTTA: no tta\n\n\nEdit:\n\nI have tried my best pipeline(above) with 5 folds to ensemble, the public score is better but does not achieve 0.98, so I think the naive ensemble(average) boost is small.\n",
      "votes": 14
    },
    {
      "id": 1318750,
      "postDate": "2021-05-22T14:41:25.670Z",
      "content": "<p>model : Nfnet_l0 <br>\nLocal Roc Auc : 0.9837 [4 folds ] , 0.9821[OOF]<br>\nPublic Roc Auc : 0.97<br>\nI think there is smaller number of +ve samples in Public Test and hence the Public Score may not be a Good Indicator of Generalization of Model , given that lot of people have got 0.97 till now ! </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "model : Nfnet_l0 \nLocal Roc Auc : 0.9837 [4 folds ] , 0.9821[OOF]\nPublic Roc Auc : 0.97\nI think there is smaller number of +ve samples in Public Test and hence the Public Score may not be a Good Indicator of Generalization of Model , given that lot of people have got 0.97 till now ! ",
      "votes": 2,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1319244,
          "postDate": "2021-05-23T03:54:04.820Z",
          "content": "<p>It's weired that NFNet never works for me. I will give it another chance someday.</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "It's weired that NFNet never works for me. I will give it another chance someday.",
          "votes": 1
        },
        {
          "id": 1319258,
          "postDate": "2021-05-23T04:27:28.753Z",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/snaker\" target=\"_blank\">@snaker</a> it's all about training pipeline :)</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "@snaker it's all about training pipeline :)"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1319260,
      "postDate": "2021-05-23T04:30:11.710Z",
      "content": "<p>Why is there a big gap between your CV and LB, and I also use B0 network cv97.7 LB 97 + which is very close？</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Why is there a big gap between your CV and LB, and I also use B0 network cv97.7 LB 97 + which is very close？",
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1319295,
          "postDate": "2021-05-23T05:18:27.257Z",
          "content": "<p>Not sure, I'm using stratified K fold</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "Not sure, I'm using stratified K fold"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1313343,
      "postDate": "2021-05-18T14:14:21.510Z",
      "content": "<p>May I ask why did you choose a single fold and not e.g 4 folds?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "May I ask why did you choose a single fold and not e.g 4 folds?",
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1314085,
          "postDate": "2021-05-19T00:25:41.730Z",
          "content": "<p>I split dataset into 5 folds, but currently only trained on 4 of them for quickly validation. May be in the last month of this game i will start to train on 5 fold and ensemble.</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "I split dataset into 5 folds, but currently only trained on 4 of them for quickly validation. May be in the last month of this game i will start to train on 5 fold and ensemble."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1312385,
      "postDate": "2021-05-18T02:54:44.123Z",
      "content": "<p>What image size are you using?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "What image size are you using?",
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1312655,
          "postDate": "2021-05-18T07:06:15.650Z",
          "content": "<p>original, no resize</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "original, no resize"
        },
        {
          "id": 1314965,
          "postDate": "2021-05-19T13:24:06.227Z",
          "content": "<p>'original'  means (273, 256) ? or (1638, 256) ?</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "'original'  means (273, 256) ? or (1638, 256) ?"
        },
        {
          "id": 1315643,
          "postDate": "2021-05-20T03:25:08.767Z",
          "content": "<p>it should be 1638, 256</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "it should be 1638, 256",
          "votes": 2
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1311767,
      "postDate": "2021-05-17T15:48:33.630Z",
      "content": "<p>You used sapatial image or channel wise?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "You used sapatial image or channel wise?",
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1312285,
          "postDate": "2021-05-18T00:58:51.463Z",
          "content": "<p>Spatial, channel wise did not work for me</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "Spatial, channel wise did not work for me",
          "votes": 1
        },
        {
          "id": 1312992,
          "postDate": "2021-05-18T11:08:40.753Z",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/snaker\" target=\"_blank\">@snaker</a> Can you please tell how you converted channel wise images into spatial ones ?</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "@snaker Can you please tell how you converted channel wise images into spatial ones ?"
        },
        {
          "id": 1313336,
          "postDate": "2021-05-18T14:12:38.173Z",
          "content": "<p>Oddly, channel-wise is better for me. </p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "Oddly, channel-wise is better for me. "
        },
        {
          "id": 1314141,
          "postDate": "2021-05-19T01:25:25.197Z",
          "content": "<p>Stack them vertically, just like the EDA notebooks looks like</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "Stack them vertically, just like the EDA notebooks looks like"
        },
        {
          "id": 1318911,
          "postDate": "2021-05-22T17:05:42.163Z",
          "content": "<p>Did you train on Kaggle? I tried it is not running on Kaggle.</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "Did you train on Kaggle? I tried it is not running on Kaggle."
        },
        {
          "id": 1319245,
          "postDate": "2021-05-23T03:54:37.227Z",
          "content": "<p>Not Kaggle, using my own resource.</p>",
          "rawMarkdown": "Not Kaggle, using my own resource."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1318750,
      "author_name": "Athar Sayed",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2021-05-22T14:41:25.670000",
      "content": "<p>model : Nfnet_l0 <br>\nLocal Roc Auc : 0.9837 [4 folds ] , 0.9821[OOF]<br>\nPublic Roc Auc : 0.97<br>\nI think there is smaller number of +ve samples in Public Test and hence the Public Score may not be a Good Indicator of Generalization of Model , given that lot of people have got 0.97 till now ! </p>",
      "votes": 2,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1319244,
          "author_name": "Chenglu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-23T03:54:04.820000",
          "content": "<p>It's weired that NFNet never works for me. I will give it another chance someday.</p>",
          "votes": 1,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1319258,
          "author_name": "Athar Sayed",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-23T04:27:28.753000",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/snaker\" target=\"_blank\">@snaker</a> it's all about training pipeline :)</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1319260,
      "author_name": "zhangeng",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2021-05-23T04:30:11.710000",
      "content": "<p>Why is there a big gap between your CV and LB, and I also use B0 network cv97.7 LB 97 + which is very close？</p>",
      "votes": 0,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1319295,
          "author_name": "Chenglu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-23T05:18:27.257000",
          "content": "<p>Not sure, I'm using stratified K fold</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1313343,
      "author_name": "Baran Hashemi",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2021-05-18T14:14:21.510000",
      "content": "<p>May I ask why did you choose a single fold and not e.g 4 folds?</p>",
      "votes": 0,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1314085,
          "author_name": "Chenglu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-19T00:25:41.730000",
          "content": "<p>I split dataset into 5 folds, but currently only trained on 4 of them for quickly validation. May be in the last month of this game i will start to train on 5 fold and ensemble.</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1312385,
      "author_name": "Chandan Verma",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2021-05-18T02:54:44.123000",
      "content": "<p>What image size are you using?</p>",
      "votes": 0,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1312655,
          "author_name": "Chenglu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-18T07:06:15.650000",
          "content": "<p>original, no resize</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1314965,
          "author_name": "Yamame🐟",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-19T13:24:06.227000",
          "content": "<p>'original'  means (273, 256) ? or (1638, 256) ?</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1315643,
          "author_name": "Chenglu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-20T03:25:08.767000",
          "content": "<p>it should be 1638, 256</p>",
          "votes": 2,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1311767,
      "author_name": "Salman",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "2021-05-17T15:48:33.630000",
      "content": "<p>You used sapatial image or channel wise?</p>",
      "votes": 0,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1312285,
          "author_name": "Chenglu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-18T00:58:51.463000",
          "content": "<p>Spatial, channel wise did not work for me</p>",
          "votes": 1,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1312992,
          "author_name": "Mithil Salunkhe",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-18T11:08:40.753000",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/snaker\" target=\"_blank\">@snaker</a> Can you please tell how you converted channel wise images into spatial ones ?</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1313336,
          "author_name": "Baran Hashemi",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-18T14:12:38.173000",
          "content": "<p>Oddly, channel-wise is better for me. </p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1314141,
          "author_name": "Chenglu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-19T01:25:25.197000",
          "content": "<p>Stack them vertically, just like the EDA notebooks looks like</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1318911,
          "author_name": "Aman Deep Gupta",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-22T17:05:42.163000",
          "content": "<p>Did you train on Kaggle? I tried it is not running on Kaggle.</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1319245,
          "author_name": "Chenglu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "2021-05-23T03:54:37.227000",
          "content": "<p>Not Kaggle, using my own resource.</p>",
          "votes": 0,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1311691": "I want to see how far can we go with just one model(and for best one fold), or it's just a ensembling game.\n\nFor me:\n\nmodel: efficientnet_b0\nfold: trained on single fold (4/5 of the dataset)\nlocal ROC AUC: 0.986\npublic ROC AUC: 0.97 ( based on \"Score Sorting\", I guess it should be around ~ 0.977 )\nTTA: no tta\n\n\nEdit:\n\nI have tried my best pipeline(above) with 5 folds to ensemble, the public score is better but does not achieve 0.98, so I think the naive ensemble(average) boost is small.\n",
    "1318750": "model : Nfnet_l0 \nLocal Roc Auc : 0.9837 [4 folds ] , 0.9821[OOF]\nPublic Roc Auc : 0.97\nI think there is smaller number of +ve samples in Public Test and hence the Public Score may not be a Good Indicator of Generalization of Model , given that lot of people have got 0.97 till now ! ",
    "1319260": "Why is there a big gap between your CV and LB, and I also use B0 network cv97.7 LB 97 + which is very close？",
    "1313343": "May I ask why did you choose a single fold and not e.g 4 folds?",
    "1312385": "What image size are you using?",
    "1311767": "You used sapatial image or channel wise?"
  }
}