{
  "id": 10058,
  "title": "Possible mistake?",
  "url": "/competitions/seizure-detection/discussion/10058",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2014-08-16T17:23:11.907Z",
  "votes": null,
  "comment_count": 2,
  "views": 1216,
  "content": "<p>Hi,</p>\n<p>Is there any chance that the labels/names for the ictal and interictal files are interchanged by mistake for Patient 4? I observe a phenomenon which is uniquely reversed&nbsp;for patient 4, as opposed to all the other subjects. &nbsp;</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "52089",
      "postDate": "08/16/2014 17:23:11",
      "content": "<p>Hi,</p>\n<p>Is there any chance that the labels/names for the ictal and interictal files are interchanged by mistake for Patient 4? I observe a phenomenon which is uniquely reversed&nbsp;for patient 4, as opposed to all the other subjects. &nbsp;</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "52096",
      "postDate": "08/17/2014 02:10:58",
      "content": "<p>According to discussions in the &quot;No ictal segment in patient 4 where latency&gt;15s&quot; post and other &quot;* patient 4 *&quot; posts, this is not a mistake.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "52101",
      "postDate": "08/17/2014 03:56:23",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for the message. What I observed was something different, something related to the overall frequency content of the ictal vs interictal segments, an&nbsp;effect totally opposite of all the other subjects. It might be just due to the size effect, due to too little number of ictal segments vs interictal segments for Patient #4.&nbsp;</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 52096,
      "author_name": "lalitapatel",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/17/2014 02:10:58",
      "content": "<p>According to discussions in the &quot;No ictal segment in patient 4 where latency&gt;15s&quot; post and other &quot;* patient 4 *&quot; posts, this is not a mistake.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 52101,
      "author_name": "iclassify",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/17/2014 03:56:23",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for the message. What I observed was something different, something related to the overall frequency content of the ictal vs interictal segments, an&nbsp;effect totally opposite of all the other subjects. It might be just due to the size effect, due to too little number of ictal segments vs interictal segments for Patient #4.&nbsp;</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "52089": "",
    "52096": "",
    "52101": ""
  },
  "source": "meta"
}