![\"372642770_1416772288_Sagittal](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F7077415%2F17ba63eee3acd7959c131df469a9ca8e%2F_20240823111440.png?generation=1724383058327242&alt=media\")
Hello everyone,
\nI have found a specific issue in the Sagittal T2/STIR series dataset where the label for the L1/L2 intervertebral disc has been mistakenly placed at the L2/L3 location. This error occurred in the entry with study_id 372642770 and series_id 1416772288. Accurate labeling is crucial for spinal anatomy analysis, and such misplacement could lead to significant inaccuracies in any computational models we develop.
\nI fully appreciate the complexities involved in managing such a detailed dataset and am grateful for the efforts of the official data providers in compiling and sharing these resources with the community. Could we kindly investigate this labeling issue to confirm and rectify the placement? Accurate labeling is essential for our analytical accuracy and the success of our collective research initiatives.🥰
\nThank you!
", "messages": [ { "id": "2967518", "postDate": "08/23/2024 02:38:07", "content": "Hello everyone,
\nI have found a specific issue in the Sagittal T2/STIR series dataset where the label for the L1/L2 intervertebral disc has been mistakenly placed at the L2/L3 location. This error occurred in the entry with study_id 372642770 and series_id 1416772288. Accurate labeling is crucial for spinal anatomy analysis, and such misplacement could lead to significant inaccuracies in any computational models we develop.
\nI fully appreciate the complexities involved in managing such a detailed dataset and am grateful for the efforts of the official data providers in compiling and sharing these resources with the community. Could we kindly investigate this labeling issue to confirm and rectify the placement? Accurate labeling is essential for our analytical accuracy and the success of our collective research initiatives.🥰
\nThank you!
", "rawMarkdown": "Hello everyone,\n\nI have found a specific issue in the **Sagittal T2/STIR** series dataset where the label for the **L1/L2** intervertebral disc has been mistakenly placed at the **L2/L3** location. This error occurred in the entry with study_id **372642770** and series_id **1416772288**. Accurate labeling is crucial for spinal anatomy analysis, and such misplacement could lead to significant inaccuracies in any computational models we develop.\n\nI fully appreciate the complexities involved in managing such a detailed dataset and am grateful for the efforts of the official data providers in compiling and sharing these resources with the community. Could we kindly investigate this labeling issue to confirm and rectify the placement? Accurate labeling is essential for our analytical accuracy and the success of our collective research initiatives.🥰\n\nThank you!", "votes": null }, { "id": "2967541", "postDate": "08/23/2024 03:18:14", "content": "
Hi @ylxy123, it is the known problem. There are many inconsistencies with the data. You can take your time and thoroughly go through discussions and your own validation. The data aspect as much as important for the competition, if not more, than the modeling itself. So it is our interest to Q/A the data and make it as clean as possible.
\ncheck this out
Sure, thank you! It seems these issues have already been raised by someone. In my subsequent work, I will attempt to identify all the \"problem\" tags and make the necessary corrections.
", "rawMarkdown": "Sure, thank you! It seems these issues have already been raised by someone. In my subsequent work, I will attempt to identify all the \"problem\" tags and make the necessary corrections.", "votes": null }, { "id": "2971074", "postDate": "08/26/2024 18:45:20", "content": "Hi, how do you find the inaccuracies in the data? Do you examine each image?
", "rawMarkdown": "Hi, how do you find the inaccuracies in the data? Do you examine each image?", "votes": null }, { "id": "2971218", "postDate": "08/27/2024 01:03:38", "content": "Hello, I identified this label noise by building a localization model for the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs. I will review the samples with larger errors based on the model's output to determine whether the error originates from the data labels or the model itself.
\n![\"372642770\"](\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F7077415%2F094c99951c92c5fc49387d5c37483a5f%2F_20240827085659.png?generation=1724720586870758&alt=media\")
Hi @ylxy123, it is the known problem. There are many inconsistencies with the data. You can take your time and thoroughly go through discussions and your own validation. The data aspect as much as important for the competition, if not more, than the modeling itself. So it is our interest to Q/A the data and make it as clean as possible.
\ncheck this out
Sure, thank you! It seems these issues have already been raised by someone. In my subsequent work, I will attempt to identify all the \"problem\" tags and make the necessary corrections.
", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 2971074, "author_name": "amanbawa", "author_url": "", "post_date": "08/26/2024 18:45:20", "content": "Hi, how do you find the inaccuracies in the data? Do you examine each image?
", "votes": null, "replies": [ { "id": 2971218, "author_name": "yaolinxiangyu", "author_url": "", "post_date": "08/27/2024 01:03:38", "content": "Hello, I identified this label noise by building a localization model for the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs. I will review the samples with larger errors based on the model's output to determine whether the error originates from the data labels or the model itself.
\n