{
  "id": 522036,
  "title": "Spinal Canal Stenosis in Sagittal T1",
  "url": "/competitions/rsna-2024-lumbar-spine-degenerative-classification/discussion/522036",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2024-07-24T06:38:22.949544100Z",
  "votes": 4,
  "comment_count": 1,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>What to do with the 5 spinal canal stenosis samples in the <code>train_series_descriptions.csv</code>? </p>\n<pre><code>df[(df[] == ) &amp; (df[] == )]\n</code></pre>\n<pre><code>    study_id    series_id   instance_number condition   level   x   y   series_description\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L1/L2       Sagittal T1\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L2/L3       Sagittal T1\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L3/L4       Sagittal T1\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L4/L5       Sagittal T1\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L5/S1       Sagittal T1\n</code></pre>\n<p>Do we just ignore them? </p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "2934030",
      "postDate": "07/24/2024 06:38:22",
      "content": "<p>What to do with the 5 spinal canal stenosis samples in the <code>train_series_descriptions.csv</code>? </p>\n<pre><code>df[(df[] == ) &amp; (df[] == )]\n</code></pre>\n<pre><code>    study_id    series_id   instance_number condition   level   x   y   series_description\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L1/L2       Sagittal T1\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L2/L3       Sagittal T1\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L3/L4       Sagittal T1\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L4/L5       Sagittal T1\n\n           Spinal Canal Stenosis   L5/S1       Sagittal T1\n</code></pre>\n<p>Do we just ignore them? </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "What to do with the 5 spinal canal stenosis samples in the `train_series_descriptions.csv`? \n```python\ndf[(df['series_description'] == \"Sagittal T1\") & (df['condition'] == \"Spinal Canal Stenosis\")]\n```\n\n```python\n\tstudy_id\tseries_id\tinstance_number\tcondition\tlevel\tx\ty\tseries_description\n\n41259\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL1/L2\t214.852201\t109.703066\tSagittal T1\n\n41260\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL2/L3\t204.388986\t150.468734\tSagittal T1\n\n41261\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL3/L4\t201.250021\t194.466270\tSagittal T1\n\n41262\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL4/L5\t205.435307\t233.520513\tSagittal T1\n\n41263\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL5/S1\t216.944844\t265.956480\tSagittal T1\n```\n\nDo we just ignore them?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2934066",
      "postDate": "07/24/2024 07:08:27",
      "content": "<p>I want to mention that the reason for this is study_id: 3637444890 series_id: 3892989905, which should normally be the location were <code>Spinal Canal Stenosis</code> condition is labelled has cervical vertebrae instead of lumbar vertebrae. See <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/rsna-2024-lumbar-spine-degenerative-classification/discussion/514891\" target=\"_blank\">this discussion</a> for more info.</p>\n<p>There may be cases in the hidden dataset where this same mismatch occurs. So, you can ignore this case, but then you will have garbage result during submission if cervical data is given. This maybe only relevant for getting final improvements in LB score after all other methods are exhausted.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I want to mention that the reason for this is study_id: 3637444890 series_id: 3892989905, which should normally be the location were `Spinal Canal Stenosis` condition is labelled has cervical vertebrae instead of lumbar vertebrae. See [this discussion](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/rsna-2024-lumbar-spine-degenerative-classification/discussion/514891) for more info.\n\nThere may be cases in the hidden dataset where this same mismatch occurs. So, you can ignore this case, but then you will have garbage result during submission if cervical data is given. This maybe only relevant for getting final improvements in LB score after all other methods are exhausted.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2934066,
      "author_name": "coderrkj",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "07/24/2024 07:08:27",
      "content": "<p>I want to mention that the reason for this is study_id: 3637444890 series_id: 3892989905, which should normally be the location were <code>Spinal Canal Stenosis</code> condition is labelled has cervical vertebrae instead of lumbar vertebrae. See <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/rsna-2024-lumbar-spine-degenerative-classification/discussion/514891\" target=\"_blank\">this discussion</a> for more info.</p>\n<p>There may be cases in the hidden dataset where this same mismatch occurs. So, you can ignore this case, but then you will have garbage result during submission if cervical data is given. This maybe only relevant for getting final improvements in LB score after all other methods are exhausted.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2934030": "What to do with the 5 spinal canal stenosis samples in the `train_series_descriptions.csv`? \n```python\ndf[(df['series_description'] == \"Sagittal T1\") & (df['condition'] == \"Spinal Canal Stenosis\")]\n```\n\n```python\n\tstudy_id\tseries_id\tinstance_number\tcondition\tlevel\tx\ty\tseries_description\n\n41259\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL1/L2\t214.852201\t109.703066\tSagittal T1\n\n41260\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL2/L3\t204.388986\t150.468734\tSagittal T1\n\n41261\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL3/L4\t201.250021\t194.466270\tSagittal T1\n\n41262\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL4/L5\t205.435307\t233.520513\tSagittal T1\n\n41263\t3637444890\t3951475160\t8\tSpinal Canal Stenosis\tL5/S1\t216.944844\t265.956480\tSagittal T1\n```\n\nDo we just ignore them?",
    "2934066": "I want to mention that the reason for this is study_id: 3637444890 series_id: 3892989905, which should normally be the location were `Spinal Canal Stenosis` condition is labelled has cervical vertebrae instead of lumbar vertebrae. See [this discussion](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/rsna-2024-lumbar-spine-degenerative-classification/discussion/514891) for more info.\n\nThere may be cases in the hidden dataset where this same mismatch occurs. So, you can ignore this case, but then you will have garbage result during submission if cervical data is given. This maybe only relevant for getting final improvements in LB score after all other methods are exhausted."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}