{
  "id": 221938,
  "title": "What about the simplest solution with 90+% LB/PB performance?",
  "url": "/competitions/rfcx-species-audio-detection/discussion/221938",
  "author_name": "Sergii Kryvenko",
  "post_date": "2021-02-24T15:50:55.234000",
  "votes": 0,
  "comment_count": 0,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>It was a great competition. Thanks to all. But what about the simplest open-source solution with 90+% performance of LB/PB? I found Miguel Pinto's solution only:<br>\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/rfcx-species-audio-detection/discussion/220306\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/rfcx-species-audio-detection/discussion/220306</a><br>\nDo simpler exist?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 1216906,
      "postDate": "2021-02-24T15:50:55.233Z",
      "content": "<p>It was a great competition. Thanks to all. But what about the simplest open-source solution with 90+% performance of LB/PB? I found Miguel Pinto's solution only:<br>\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/rfcx-species-audio-detection/discussion/220306\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/rfcx-species-audio-detection/discussion/220306</a><br>\nDo simpler exist?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "It was a great competition. Thanks to all. But what about the simplest open-source solution with 90+% performance of LB/PB? I found Miguel Pinto's solution only:\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/rfcx-species-audio-detection/discussion/220306\nDo simpler exist?\n\n"
    }
  ],
  "comments": [],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1216906": "It was a great competition. Thanks to all. But what about the simplest open-source solution with 90+% performance of LB/PB? I found Miguel Pinto's solution only:\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/rfcx-species-audio-detection/discussion/220306\nDo simpler exist?\n\n"
  }
}