{
  "id": 414897,
  "title": "[fixed] Efficiency LeaderBoard is broken?",
  "url": "/competitions/predict-student-performance-from-game-play/discussion/414897",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2023-06-03T23:29:31.925194100Z",
  "votes": 10,
  "comment_count": 3,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>It looks like the Effieciency Leader Board is broken. It appears to be neatly aligned in LB order.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/philculliton/student-performance-efficiency-leaderboard\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/code/philculliton/student-performance-efficiency-leaderboard</a></p>\n<p>Assuming that they are in LB order, you can see that the results are quite different from the current LB. I am assuming that this is because the results predicted by the new test data are being displayed ahead of the current results…? <br>\nEither way, it seems to me that a lot of things are broken and never properly managed in this competition.</p>\n<p>[PS] It seems to be fixed now(2023-06-05).</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "2286901",
      "postDate": "06/03/2023 23:29:31",
      "content": "<p>It looks like the Effieciency Leader Board is broken. It appears to be neatly aligned in LB order.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/code/philculliton/student-performance-efficiency-leaderboard\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/code/philculliton/student-performance-efficiency-leaderboard</a></p>\n<p>Assuming that they are in LB order, you can see that the results are quite different from the current LB. I am assuming that this is because the results predicted by the new test data are being displayed ahead of the current results…? <br>\nEither way, it seems to me that a lot of things are broken and never properly managed in this competition.</p>\n<p>[PS] It seems to be fixed now(2023-06-05).</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "It looks like the Effieciency Leader Board is broken. It appears to be neatly aligned in LB order.\n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/philculliton/student-performance-efficiency-leaderboard\n\nAssuming that they are in LB order, you can see that the results are quite different from the current LB. I am assuming that this is because the results predicted by the new test data are being displayed ahead of the current results…? \nEither way, it seems to me that a lot of things are broken and never properly managed in this competition.\n\n[PS] It seems to be fixed now(2023-06-05).",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2287095",
      "postDate": "06/04/2023 06:20:53",
      "content": "<p>Our team has chosen the 0.702 sub as the final sub to see how efficient it is. <br>\nTherefore, I assume that the current Efficiency LB is not showing the results for the new test, but the public LB score for each team's selected sub.</p>\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Either way, it seems to me that a lot of things are broken and never properly managed in this competition.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>I agree with the statement😄</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Our team has chosen the 0.702 sub as the final sub to see how efficient it is. \nTherefore, I assume that the current Efficiency LB is not showing the results for the new test, but the public LB score for each team's selected sub.\n\n>Either way, it seems to me that a lot of things are broken and never properly managed in this competition.\n\nI agree with the statement😄",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2287548",
      "postDate": "06/04/2023 16:17:50",
      "content": "<p>update: Efficiency LB seems to have been fixed.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "update: Efficiency LB seems to have been fixed.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2287557",
      "postDate": "06/04/2023 16:36:55",
      "content": "<p>Well double and triple rows is not fixed LB 😄</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Well double and triple rows is not fixed LB 😄",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2287095,
      "author_name": "shu421",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/04/2023 06:20:53",
      "content": "<p>Our team has chosen the 0.702 sub as the final sub to see how efficient it is. <br>\nTherefore, I assume that the current Efficiency LB is not showing the results for the new test, but the public LB score for each team's selected sub.</p>\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Either way, it seems to me that a lot of things are broken and never properly managed in this competition.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>I agree with the statement😄</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2287548,
          "author_name": "shu421",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "06/04/2023 16:17:50",
          "content": "<p>update: Efficiency LB seems to have been fixed.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": [
            {
              "id": 2287557,
              "author_name": "kvlmll",
              "author_url": "",
              "post_date": "06/04/2023 16:36:55",
              "content": "<p>Well double and triple rows is not fixed LB 😄</p>",
              "votes": null,
              "replies": []
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2286901": "It looks like the Effieciency Leader Board is broken. It appears to be neatly aligned in LB order.\n\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/philculliton/student-performance-efficiency-leaderboard\n\nAssuming that they are in LB order, you can see that the results are quite different from the current LB. I am assuming that this is because the results predicted by the new test data are being displayed ahead of the current results…? \nEither way, it seems to me that a lot of things are broken and never properly managed in this competition.\n\n[PS] It seems to be fixed now(2023-06-05).",
    "2287095": "Our team has chosen the 0.702 sub as the final sub to see how efficient it is. \nTherefore, I assume that the current Efficiency LB is not showing the results for the new test, but the public LB score for each team's selected sub.\n\n>Either way, it seems to me that a lot of things are broken and never properly managed in this competition.\n\nI agree with the statement😄",
    "2287548": "update: Efficiency LB seems to have been fixed.",
    "2287557": "Well double and triple rows is not fixed LB 😄"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}