{"metadata":{"kernelspec":{"language":"python","display_name":"Python 3","name":"python3"},"language_info":{"pygments_lexer":"ipython3","nbconvert_exporter":"python","version":"3.6.4","file_extension":".py","codemirror_mode":{"name":"ipython","version":3},"name":"python","mimetype":"text/x-python"}},"nbformat_minor":4,"nbformat":4,"cells":[{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/M6rn9BD/pretraining.png\" alt=\"pretraining\" border=\"0\">","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<b style=\"color: red;\">Note: Upcoming implementations are set to be released soon. We apologize for any potential delays or uncertainties regarding the release, and recommend staying alert for further updates.</b>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Introduction</h1>\n<p>\nNatural language processing has advanced significantly in recent years with the emergence of powerful pretraining techniques for language models. Pretraining language models on vast amounts of unstructured data has made it possible to create versatile models that can be fine-tuned for various natural language processing tasks.\n</p>\n<p>\nThis article provides an in-depth overview of pretraining techniques for language models such as Masked Language Models (MLM), Replaced Token Detection (RTD), Sentence Order Prediction, Whole Word Masking (WWM), and others. The article explains the theory behind each technique and provides detailed instructions for implementing them using widely-used deep learning frameworks like PyTorch, PyTorch Lightning, and HuggingFace Transformers.\n</p>\n<p>\nThe aim of the article is to equip readers with the comprehensive knowledge of these pretraining techniques and the ability to implement them in their own work. Whether you're a newcomer to natural language processing or an experienced practitioner, this article provides the necessary knowledge and tools to leverage the latest pretraining techniques for language models.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>What is Pre-training of Language Models?</h1>\n<p>\nPre-training is a technique used in natural language processing to train a language model on a large amount of unlabeled text data before fine-tuning it on a specific task. The goal of pre-training is to create a model that can learn the structure and patterns of language, allowing it to develop a deep understanding of the language and generate coherent and contextually relevant responses.\n\nFine-tuning a pre-trained language model involves training the model on a smaller labeled dataset specific to the task, such as sentiment analysis, text classification, or named entity recognition. The pre-trained model is then adapted to the specific task, resulting in improved performance on that task. For example, a pre-trained model might be fine-tuned on a sentiment analysis task to classify movie reviews as positive or negative.\n\nSeveral pre-trained language models have shown significant improvements when fine-tuned on specific tasks. BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), a pre-trained model developed by Google, has been fine-tuned on a variety of tasks, including question-answering, natural language inference, and sentiment analysis, and has shown state-of-the-art performance on many benchmarks. Another example is GPT-2 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 2), a pre-trained model developed by OpenAI, which has been fine-tuned on a variety of tasks, including text completion, machine translation, and summarization, and has also shown state-of-the-art performance on many benchmarks.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<center>\n<img src=\"https://i0.wp.com/neptune.ai/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/bert_models_layout.jpeg?ssl=1\"><br>\n<span>Transformers family. Source: <a href=\"https://github.com/thunlp/PLMpapers\">PLMpapers</a></span>\n</center>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Data</h1>\n<p>\nThe author plans to use recent data from a Kaggle competition to demonstrate how language models can be pre-trained. By utilizing this data, the author aims to showcase different pre-training techniques, such as Masked Language Modeling and Replaced Token Detection, and how they can improve the accuracy of language models. The demonstration will highlight the benefits of pre-training language models for natural language processing applications and showcase how state-of-the-art language models can be developed.\n</p>\n<p>\nTo pretrain language models using the PyTorch framework, users need to write a Dataset class to process the data on a sample-by-sample basis. This allows for efficient data loading and processing during pretraining. The Dataset class is responsible for defining how the data is read, processed, and transformed into inputs that can be used by the language model. This typically involves tokenizing the input text and creating input-output pairs for pretraining tasks such as Masked Language Modeling or Replaced Token Detection. By implementing a custom Dataset class, users can tailor the pretraining process to their specific data and pretraining objectives.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"code","source":"from transformers import AutoTokenizer\nfrom torch.utils.data import Dataset\nimport pandas as pd\nimport numpy as np\nimport warnings\nimport os\n\n\nwarnings.simplefilter(\"ignore\")\nos.environ[\"TOKENIZERS_PARALLELISM\"] = \"false\"","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:30:49.840417Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:30:49.840884Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:30:52.190234Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:30:49.840792Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:30:52.189201Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"code","source":"class PretrainingDataset(Dataset):\n    def __init__(self, texts, tokenizer, texts_pair=None, max_length=512):\n        super().__init__()\n        \n        self.texts = texts\n        self.texts_pair = texts_pair\n        self.tokenizer = tokenizer\n        self.max_length = max_length\n        \n        if self.texts_pair is not None:\n            assert len(self.texts) == len(self.texts_pair)\n        \n    def __len__(self):\n        return len(self.texts)\n    \n    def tokenize(self, text, text_pair=None):\n        return self.tokenizer(\n            text=text, \n            text_pair=text_pair,\n            max_length=self.max_length,\n            truncation=True,\n            padding=False, \n            return_attention_mask=True,\n            add_special_tokens=True,\n            return_special_tokens_mask=True,\n            return_token_type_ids=False,\n            return_offsets_mapping=False,\n            return_tensors=None,\n        )\n    \n    def __getitem__(self, index):\n        text = self.texts[index]\n        \n        text_pair = None\n        if self.texts_pair is not None:\n            text_pair = self.texts_pair[index]\n            \n        tokenized = self.tokenize(text)\n        \n        return tokenized","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:30:56.109141Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:30:56.109723Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:30:56.121072Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:30:56.109689Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:30:56.119795Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"code","source":"data_path = \"/kaggle/input/feedback-prize-english-language-learning/train.csv\"\ndata = pd.read_csv(data_path)\n\ntexts = data[\"full_text\"].values","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:30:56.927095Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:30:56.927503Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:30:57.331555Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:30:56.927470Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:30:57.330386Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"code","source":"model_name_or_path = \"microsoft/deberta-v3-base\"\nmax_length = 512\n\ntokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name_or_path)","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:30:58.751393Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:30:58.751969Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.507429Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:30:58.751920Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.506233Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"code","source":"dataset = PretrainingDataset(\n    texts=texts, \n    tokenizer=tokenizer, \n    max_length=max_length,\n)","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.509373Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.509742Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.514304Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.509707Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.513330Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1><i>pretraining</i> library</h1>\n<p>\nThe pretraining library is a comprehensive tool for Language Models Pretraining (LMs Pretraining). Its flexible and high-quality API allows researchers and developers to pretrain various language models with ease. The library provides a range of pretraining techniques, including Masked Language Modeling, Replaced Token Detection, Span Masking, and others. With its extensive set of features and capabilities, the pretraining library is an ideal solution for those looking to develop state-of-the-art language models for natural language processing applications.\n</p>\n<p>\nThe pretraining library will be utilized by the author to demonstrate how to pretrain Language Models using a variety of techniques.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"code","source":"import sys\nsys.path.append(\"/kaggle/input/pretraining/pretraining-main/src\")\nimport pretraining","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.515804Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.516786Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.532278Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.516743Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:31:04.531010Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Causal Language Modeling</h1>\n<p>\nCausal Language Modeling (CLM) is a pretraining technique that involves training a language model to predict the next token in a sequence given the previous tokens. The goal is to teach the model to understand the underlying structure of language and to generate coherent, natural language text.\n\nMany popular language models have been trained using CLM, including GPT, GPT-2, GPT-3, and T5. These models have been shown to achieve state-of-the-art performance on a wide range of natural language processing tasks, such as language generation, text classification, and language translation.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<center>\n    <img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/9wRbcPw/clm.png\">\n</center>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Masked Language Modeling</h1>\n<p>\nMasked Language Modeling (MLM) is a pretraining technique for language models where a certain percentage of tokens in a text sequence are randomly replaced with a special \"mask\" token. The model then tries to predict the original tokens based on the context of the masked tokens.\n</p>\n<p>\nThis technique was first introduced in the BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) model, which achieved state-of-the-art results on a range of natural language processing tasks. BERT was pre-trained on massive amounts of unstructured text data using MLM, allowing it to learn contextualized representations of language that could be fine-tuned on various downstream tasks such as question answering, sentiment analysis, and text classification.\n</p>\n<p>\nSubsequent models such as RoBERTa, ELECTRA, and GPT-2 also employed MLM as a pretraining technique, with some modifications to improve performance. For example, RoBERTa used dynamic masking and training data augmentation, while ELECTRA used a discriminator generator setup to improve the training process. GPT-2 used a variant of MLM called \"cloze-style\" where the model was trained to predict the next token given the preceding tokens.\n</p>\n<p>\nOverall, MLM has been shown to be an effective pretraining technique for language models, enabling them to learn rich contextualized representations of language that can be fine-tuned for a wide range of natural language processing tasks.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<center>\n    <img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/drnqg0N/mlm.png\">\n</center>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<p>\nThe hyperparameters for MLM include the masking rate (the percentage of tokens to mask in the input), the ratio of different types of masks (e.g., whether to use [MASK], [UNK], or a random word to replace the masked token), and the number of masked tokens in each input sequence.\n\nRecent studies have shown that the choice of hyperparameters for MLM can have a significant impact on the performance of the resulting language model. For example, in the article \"Should You Mask 15% in Masked Language Modeling?\", the author discovered that increasing the masking rate from the traditional 15% to 30% or more can improve performance on some tasks, particularly those that require reasoning about longer-term dependencies\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h3>HuggingFace implementation</h3>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"code","source":"from transformers import AutoModelForMaskedLM, TrainingArguments, Trainer, DataCollatorForLanguageModeling\n\n\nmodel = AutoModelForMaskedLM.from_pretrained(model_name_or_path)\n\ndata_collator = DataCollatorForLanguageModeling(\n    tokenizer=tokenizer, \n    mlm=True, \n    mlm_probability=0.15,\n)\n\n# training_args = TrainingArguments(...)\n\n# trainer = Trainer(\n#     model=model,\n#     args=training_args,\n#     data_collator=data_collator,\n#     train_dataset=dataset,\n# )\n\n# trainer.train()","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:31:06.099374Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:31:06.099761Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:31:28.708374Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:31:06.099728Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:31:28.707159Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h3>PyTorch Lightning implementation</h3>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"code","source":"import torch\nfrom torch import nn\nfrom torch.nn import functional as F\nfrom torch.utils.data import DataLoader\nfrom torch.utils.checkpoint import checkpoint\nfrom transformers import AutoModel, AutoConfig\nfrom torchmetrics import functional as metrics\nfrom pytorch_lightning import LightningModule, Trainer\nfrom pretraining.data_collators import MaskedLanguageModelingDataCollator\nimport math\nimport os","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:31:28.710836Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:31:28.712359Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.126481Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:31:28.712311Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.125290Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"code","source":"class MaskedLanguageModelingModel(LightningModule):\n    def __init__(self, model_name_or_path, tokenizer, config=None, ignore_index=-100, gradient_checkpointing=False):\n        super().__init__()\n        \n        self.ignore_index = ignore_index\n        self.config = config\n        self.token_embeddings_size = len(tokenizer)\n        \n        if self.config is None:\n            self.config = AutoConfig.from_pretrained(model_name_or_path)\n        \n        self.config.output_hidden_states = True\n        \n        self.backbone = AutoModel.from_pretrained(model_name_or_path, config=self.config)\n        self.backbone.resize_token_embeddings(self.token_embeddings_size)\n        \n        self.head = nn.Linear(in_features=self.config.hidden_size, out_features=self.token_embeddings_size)\n        \n        if gradient_checkpointing:\n            self.backbone.gradient_checkpointing_enable()\n            print(f\"Gradient Checkpointing: {self.backbone.is_gradient_checkpointing}\")\n        \n        self.save_hyperparameters()\n        \n    def forward(self, input_ids, attention_mask=None, **kwargs):\n        backbone_outputs = self.backbone(\n            input_ids=input_ids, \n            attention_mask=attention_mask, \n            **kwargs,\n        )\n        \n        hidden_states = backbone_outputs.hidden_states\n        hidden_state = hidden_states[-1]\n        features = hidden_state[:,0,:]\n        outputs = self.head(features)\n        \n        return outputs\n        \n    def training_step(self, batch, batch_index):\n        input_ids = batch[\"input_ids\"].to(torch.int32)\n        attention_mask = batch[\"attention_mask\"].to(torch.int32)\n        labels = batch[\"labels\"].to(torch.float16)\n        \n        outputs = self(input_ids=input_ids, attention_mask=attention_mask)\n        \n        loss = F.cross_entropy(input=outputs, target=labels, ignore_index=self.ignore_index)\n        perplexity = math.exp(loss)\n        \n        # accuracy\n        predictions = torch.softmax(outputs, dim=-1)\n        accuracy = self.compute_accuracy(predictions, labels)\n        \n        logs = {\n            \"train/loss\": loss,\n            \"train/perplexity\": perplexity,\n            \"train/accuracy\": accuracy,\n        }\n        \n        self.log_dict(logs, prog_bar=False, on_step=True, on_epoch=True)\n        \n        return loss\n    \n    def validation_step(self, batch, batch_index):\n        input_ids = batch[\"input_ids\"].to(torch.int32)\n        attention_mask = batch[\"attention_mask\"].to(torch.int32)\n        labels = batch[\"labels\"].to(torch.float16)\n        \n        outputs = self(input_ids=input_ids, attention_mask=attention_mask)\n        \n        return {\n            \"outputs\": outputs,\n            \"labels\": labels,\n        }\n    \n    def validation_epoch_end(self, validation_outputs):\n        outputs = torch.cat([output[\"outputs\"] for output in validation_outputs], dim=0)\n        labels = torch.cat([output[\"labels\"] for output in validation_outputs], dim=0)\n        \n        loss = F.cross_entropy(input=outputs, target=labels, ignore_index=self.ignore_index)\n        perplexity = math.exp(loss)\n        \n        # accuracy\n        predictions = torch.softmax(outputs, dim=-1)\n        accuracy = self.compute_accuracy(predictions, labels)\n        \n        logs = {\n            \"validation/loss\": loss,\n            \"validation/perplexity\": perplexity,\n            \"validation/accuracy\": accuracy,\n        }\n\n        self.log_dict(logs, prog_bar=False, on_step=False, on_epoch=True)\n        \n    def predict_step(self, batch, batch_index):\n        input_ids = batch[\"input_ids\"].to(torch.int32)\n        attention_mask = batch[\"attention_mask\"].to(torch.int32)\n        \n        outputs = self(input_ids=input_ids, attention_mask=attention_mask)\n        \n        return outputs\n    \n    def compute_accuracy(self, predictions, labels):\n        predictions = predictions.view(-1)\n        labels = labels.view(-1)\n        mask = labels != self.ignore_index\n        predictions, labels = predictions[mask], labels[mask]\n        \n        accuracy = metrics.accuracy(predictions, labels)\n        \n        return accuracy","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.129439Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.130242Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.154505Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.130193Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.153207Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"code","source":"data_collator = MaskedLanguageModelingDataCollator(\n    input_key=\"input_ids\", \n    label_key=\"label\",\n    tokenizer=tokenizer,\n    special_tokens_mask_key=\"special_tokens_mask\", \n    masking_probability=0.15,\n    padding_keys=[\"input_ids\", \"attention_mask\", \"special_tokens_mask\"],\n    padding_values=[tokenizer.pad_token_id, 1, 1],\n)\n\ndataloader = DataLoader(\n    dataset=dataset, \n    collate_fn=data_collator,\n)\n\nmodel = MaskedLanguageModelingModel(\n    model_name_or_path=model_name_or_path,\n    tokenizer=tokenizer, \n    gradient_checkpointing=False,\n)\n\n# trainer = Trainer(...)\n# trainer.fit(model=model, train_dataloaders=[dataloader], ckpt_path=None)","metadata":{"execution":{"iopub.status.busy":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.157399Z","iopub.execute_input":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.157896Z","iopub.status.idle":"2023-02-26T15:31:36.591999Z","shell.execute_reply.started":"2023-02-26T15:31:30.157848Z","shell.execute_reply":"2023-02-26T15:31:36.590705Z"},"trusted":true},"execution_count":null,"outputs":[]},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Sentence Order Prediction</h1>\n<p>\nSentence Order Prediction (SOP) is a pretraining technique for language models where the model is trained to predict the correct order of sentences in a text sequence. By learning to identify the correct order of sentences, the model can capture the relationships between the different sentences in a text sequence and learn to generate coherent text.\n</p>\n<p>\nSOP has been used as a pretraining technique in various language models such as BERT and RoBERTa, in combination with other pretraining techniques like Masked Language Modeling. It has been shown to improve the performance of language models on various downstream natural language processing tasks, such as document classification and sentiment analysis.\n</p>\n<p>\nHowever, some studies have found that SOP on its own may not be as effective as other pretraining techniques like MLM. Ablation studies, which involve removing different components of the pretraining process to measure their effectiveness, have shown that SOP may not contribute as much to the overall performance of the model as other pretraining techniques. Nevertheless, SOP can still be a useful component in a multi-task pretraining setup, as it can help models learn to understand the structure of text and the relationships between different parts of the text.\n</p>\n<p>\nDuring SOP pretraining, the model is presented with a set of randomly shuffled sentences, and it must predict the correct order of the sentences. This is typically done by concatenating the shuffled sentences into a single text sequence and adding special separator tokens between each sentence to indicate the sentence boundaries.\n\nFor example, if we have three sentences \"The cat sat on the mat.\", \"It was a sunny day.\", and \"The birds were chirping.\", the input sequence to the model could look like this:\n\n[CLS] The cat sat on the mat. [SEP] It was a sunny day. [SEP] The birds were chirping. [SEP]\n\nThe [CLS] token marks the beginning of the sequence, and the [SEP] tokens mark the end of each sentence. The model is then trained to predict the correct order of the sentences.\n\nDuring fine-tuning, the model can be trained on a downstream task by feeding it with a similar input sequence, but with a label indicating the correct order of the sentences. \n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Whole Word Masking</h1>\n<p>\nWhole Word Masking (WWM) is a pretraining technique for language models that is similar to Masked Language Modeling (MLM), but instead of masking individual tokens in the input sequence, whole words are masked.\n\nIn WWM, a subset of words in the input sequence is selected and replaced with a special mask token. The model is then trained to predict the original words based on the context of the surrounding words.\n\nWWM has been shown to be effective for tasks where word boundaries are important, such as named entity recognition, where it is important to identify entire words as entities rather than individual tokens. In these cases, WWM can be more effective than MLM, which can sometimes mask only parts of words and make it harder for the model to learn the correct boundaries of named entities.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Replaced Token Detection</h1>\n<p>\nReplaced Token Detection (RTD) is a pretraining technique for language models that involves replacing some tokens in the input with other tokens, and then training the model to predict which tokens have been replaced. This technique has been used in pretraining large-scale language models such as ELECTRA and DeBERTa v3.\n\nTo pretrain a model with RTD, a certain percentage of tokens in the input are randomly replaced with other tokens, and the model is then trained to predict which tokens have been replaced. During pretraining with RTD, the model minimizes a loss function that compares the predicted and actual tokens that have been replaced in the input. The loss function used for RTD is often binary cross-entropy, which calculates the difference between the predicted and actual labels for each replaced token, and then averages them across all replaced tokens in the batch. The model then updates its parameters based on the gradients of the loss function. By minimizing this loss function, the model learns to better distinguish between replaced and unchanged tokens and improve its ability to understand the context and relationships between words.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<center>\n    <img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/B2xztMK/rtd.png\">\n</center>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Permutation Language Modeling</h1>\n<p>\nPermutation Language Modeling is a pretraining technique for language models that involves permuting the order of some input tokens, and then training the model to predict the original order of the tokens. Permutation Language Modeling can be much better than other pretraining techniques in cases where the task requires understanding long-range dependencies between tokens in a sequence, such as in natural language generation. By training the model to predict the original order of the tokens, it is forced to learn to capture these long-range dependencies, which can be difficult to learn with other pretraining techniques. Compared to Masked Language Modeling, which randomly masks some of the tokens in the input, Permutation Language Modeling requires the model to learn the correct order of all the tokens in the input sequence. While MLM can be effective for learning local context and word prediction, PLM has been shown to be better at capturing global dependencies and long-range relations between words. However, PLM can also be computationally expensive and can require larger amounts of training data to perform well.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Span Masking / Predicting spans</h1>\n<p>\nSpan Masking is a pretraining technique for language models that involves predicting spans of text within a given document. This technique is often used in conjunction with other pretraining tasks, such as masked language modeling, to improve the quality of the language model's representations.\n    \nSpan Masking can be particularly beneficial in cases where the downstream task requires the model to identify specific pieces of information within a document, such as named entities, events, or relationships between entities. By pretraining the model to predict spans of text, it learns to identify important information within a document and can generate more accurate representations of that information.\n\nFor example, in the task of named entity recognition, the model must identify and classify mentions of named entities within a document. By pretraining the model to predict spans of text that correspond to named entities, it learns to identify and extract relevant information from the document, which can improve its performance on the downstream task.\n\nSequence-to-sequence models like T5 and BART were pre-trained using the Span Masking technique, as an example.\n    \nOverall, Span Masking can be a powerful pretraining technique for language models in tasks where identifying specific pieces of information within a document is important. However, it may not be as useful in tasks where the focus is on understanding the overall meaning or structure of the document.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<center>\n<img src=\"https://psi9730.github.io/machinelearning-blog/assets/images/2019-11-11-SpanBERT-Improving-Pre-Training-By-Representing-And-Predicting-Spans-1.png\"><br>\n<span>Source: <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10529\">SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spans</a></span>\n</center>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Translation Language Modeling</h1>\n<p>\nTranslation Language Modeling (TLM) is a pretraining technique that has gained increasing attention in recent years. It was proposed by Facebook AI Research (FAIR) in a 2019 paper as a solution to address the issue of low-resource languages, where there is a lack of parallel data to train high-quality translation models.\n\nTLM is based on the concept of Masked Language Modeling (MLM), which is commonly used in pretraining language models like BERT. It involves pretraining a translation model to predict a masked token in a sentence given the surrounding context in both the source and target languages.\n\nBy pretraining the model on a large corpus of text in multiple languages, TLM enables the model to learn cross-lingual representations that can be used for a variety of language tasks, including machine translation, cross-lingual document classification, and cross-lingual question answering. TLM has shown promising results in improving the efficiency and quality of translation and other language tasks, particularly for low-resource languages, which has led to increased interest and research in this area.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<center>\n    <img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/wKdnm3w/Screenshot-4.png\"><br>\n    <span>Source: <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.07291.pdf\">Cross-lingual Language Model Pretraining</a></span>\n</center>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Contrastive Learning</h1>\n<p>\nContrastive learning is a type of unsupervised learning that involves training a model to differentiate between similar and dissimilar examples in a given dataset. The goal is to learn a representation of the data that captures the underlying structure and relationships between different examples.\n\nIn contrastive learning, the model is trained on pairs of examples, where one example is considered a positive example and the other is considered a negative example. The model is trained to maximize the similarity between positive examples and minimize the similarity between negative examples.\n\nTo train a model with contrastive learning, you first need to select a dataset and choose a set of positive and negative pairs of examples. The model is then trained to maximize a contrastive loss function, which penalizes the model for predicting a high similarity score for negative pairs and a low similarity score for positive pairs. The training process typically involves training the model on a large dataset using a deep neural network and stochastic gradient descent optimization.\n    \nSentence-BERT is an example of a model that uses contrastive learning. The contrastive loss function used in SBERT encourages the model to learn representations that maximize the similarity between similar sentences and minimize the similarity between dissimilar sentences. This approach allows SBERT to generate sentence embeddings that capture the semantic similarity between sentences, making it a powerful tool for a variety of natural language processing tasks.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<center>\n    <img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/th2R41V/Screenshot-8.png\"><br>\n    <span>Source: <a href=\"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.10084.pdf\">Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks</a></span>\n</center>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Tips and Tricks for Pre-training</h1>\n<p>\nPretraining language models can be a challenging and time-consuming task, but there are several tips and tricks that can help you get the best results:\n<ul>\n<li>Choose the right dataset: The quality and size of the dataset used for pretraining can have a significant impact on the performance of the language model. It's important to choose a dataset that is large enough and representative of the target domain.</li>\n<li>Use data augmentation techniques: Data augmentation can help increase the diversity of the training data and improve the robustness of the language model. Common techniques include random deletion, shuffling, and masking of words.</li>\n<li>Experiment with different architectures: There are many different architectures that can be used for pretraining language models, including Transformer-based models, LSTM-based models, and CNN-based models. Experimenting with different architectures can help you find the one that works best for your specific task.</li>\n<li>Fine-tune on downstream tasks: Fine-tuning the pretrained language model on specific downstream tasks can help improve its performance and make it more useful. It's important to choose a diverse set of downstream tasks to ensure that the model is able to generalize well to new tasks.\nMonitor training progress: Monitoring the training progress of the language model can help you identify issues early on and make adjustments as needed. It's important to keep track of metrics such as loss, perplexity, and accuracy during training.</li>\n<li>Regularize the model: Regularization techniques such as dropout, weight decay, and early stopping can help prevent overfitting and improve the generalization ability of the language model.</li>\n<li>Use a large batch size: Using a large batch size during training can help improve the efficiency of the training process and lead to better results. However, it's important to choose a batch size that is appropriate for the available hardware and memory constraints</li>\n</ul>\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Additional literature</h1>\n<p>\nIf you are interested in exploring the topic of language models pretraining further, the author recommends the following additional useful literature:\n<ul>\n<li>\"Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks\" by Wei Yang, et al. (2020) proposes a novel approach to adapting pre-trained language models to specific domains and tasks through continued pre-training. The authors show that this approach outperforms fine-tuning on a variety of downstream tasks, including sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, and question answering.</li>\n<li>\"Self-training Improves Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding\" by Xiaoya Li, et al. (2021) investigates the effectiveness of self-training in improving pre-training for natural language understanding. The authors propose a self-training framework that iteratively refines the pre-trained model by leveraging unlabeled data, and show that this approach can significantly improve the performance of the pre-trained model on several downstream tasks, including natural language inference and sentiment analysis.</li>\n<li>\"Frustratingly Simple Pretraining Alternatives to Masked Language Modeling\" by Alex Wang, et al. (2021) explores simple alternatives to the popular pre-training technique of Masked Language Modeling (MLM) and evaluates their effectiveness on several downstream tasks. The authors propose and evaluate two pre-training objectives: Permutation Language Modeling (PLM), which involves predicting the order of randomly permuted words, and Sentence Order Prediction (SOP), which involves predicting the relative order of sentences in a document.</li>\n</ul>\nThese articles highlight the importance of continuous improvement and adaptation of pre-trained language models to specific domains and tasks, as well as the potential benefits of leveraging self-training techniques and exploring alternative pre-training objectives.\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Conclusion</h1>\n<p>\nIn conclusion, the exploration and implementation of various pretraining techniques, such as Masked Language Modeling, Replaced Token Detection, and Whole Word Masking, have shown that each technique can significantly impact the performance of language models on various Fine-Tuning tasks.\n</p>\n<p>\nWhile each technique has its unique advantages and disadvantages, they are all important for improving language models' performance and allowing them to excel in various Fine-Tuning tasks. Through our exploration and implementation of these techniques, we have gained a deeper understanding of how pretraining techniques can impact language models' performance and improve their effectiveness in real-world applications.\n</p>\n<p>\nIn summary, pretraining techniques have revolutionized the field of Natural Language Processing and are vital for developing highly accurate and effective language models. By continuing to explore and improve these techniques, we can push the boundaries of what language models can achieve and drive new innovations in the field.\n</p>\n<p>\nThe field of language model pretraining is constantly evolving, and there are always new techniques and approaches being developed and explored. The author of this article is committed to staying up-to-date on the latest developments in this field and will continue to update this article with new information and insights as they become available. So, if you want to stay informed about the latest advances in language model pretraining, be sure to check back often and stay tuned for updates!\n</p>","metadata":{}},{"cell_type":"markdown","source":"<h1>Feedback</h1>\n<p>\n    I hope you found my article on LM pretraining techniques informative and useful. If you have any feedback or suggestions specifically for this article, please let me know. I value your input and am committed to providing high-quality content to our readers. Thank you for reading!\n</p>","metadata":{}}]}