Dear PlantCLEF25 participants,
\nThank you once again for your incredible efforts in PlantCLEF25!
\nWe’re reaching out to inform you that both the competition deadline and the working notes submission deadline have been officially postponed, due to a delay in the release of the 2025 author instructions. We want to ensure all teams have enough time to prepare their working notes properly. Once we have the detailed instructions, we will let you know!
\nThe remaining deadlines (notification of acceptance and camera-ready submission) are kept the same.
\nAs a reminder, all participants are encouraged to submit a working note detailing their methods and results. Even if you're not in the Top 10.
\nIf you have any questions, don’t hesitate to ask in this thread.
\nOn behalf of the organization committee,
\nLukas Picek
Dear PlantCLEF25 participants,
\nThank you once again for your incredible efforts in PlantCLEF25!
\nWe’re reaching out to inform you that both the competition deadline and the working notes submission deadline have been officially postponed, due to a delay in the release of the 2025 author instructions. We want to ensure all teams have enough time to prepare their working notes properly. Once we have the detailed instructions, we will let you know!
\nThe remaining deadlines (notification of acceptance and camera-ready submission) are kept the same.
\nAs a reminder, all participants are encouraged to submit a working note detailing their methods and results. Even if you're not in the Top 10.
\nIf you have any questions, don’t hesitate to ask in this thread.
\nOn behalf of the organization committee,
\nLukas Picek
Hi Organising team,
\nNow that the competition has officially concluded, we would like to kindly request the release of the full results. The margins between the top-ranked teams this year were exceptionally narrow. Would it be possible to access detailed metrics similar to those provided last year, such as Macro F1 Averaged Per Plot, Macro F1 Averaged Per Species, and Micro F1? Access to the complete test set ground truth would also be highly valuable for understanding the performance distribution, conducting thorough analysis, and preparing academic publications that accurately reflect the competition outcomes.
Many thanks in advance!
\n— Atlantic Team
Hi Steve,
\nthank you for your message. We understand your interest in accessing all the tests and appreciate your motivation to conduct more in-depth analyses.
\nHowever, we have decided not to publish the ground truth annotations for the time being. This test data is extremely rare and costly to produce (both in terms of time and money), as it requires specialized knowledge. In addition, we have not yet determined whether a similar challenge (e.g. PlantCLEF 2026) will be organized. If so, it's important to preserve the integrity of the current test set.
\nThat said, we do plan to publish the ground truth, as soon as we have a comparable alternative test set.
\nBest regards,
\nThe organizing team
Hi, with regard to the paper submission, are there any updates on how should we do it? Thank you in advance.
", "rawMarkdown": "Hi, with regard to the paper submission, are there any updates on how should we do it? Thank you in advance.", "votes": null } ], "comments": [ { "id": 3205964, "author_name": "stevefffff", "author_url": "", "post_date": "05/20/2025 16:20:22", "content": "Hi Organising team,
\nNow that the competition has officially concluded, we would like to kindly request the release of the full results. The margins between the top-ranked teams this year were exceptionally narrow. Would it be possible to access detailed metrics similar to those provided last year, such as Macro F1 Averaged Per Plot, Macro F1 Averaged Per Species, and Micro F1? Access to the complete test set ground truth would also be highly valuable for understanding the performance distribution, conducting thorough analysis, and preparing academic publications that accurately reflect the competition outcomes.
Many thanks in advance!
\n— Atlantic Team
Hi Steve,
\nthank you for your message. We understand your interest in accessing all the tests and appreciate your motivation to conduct more in-depth analyses.
\nHowever, we have decided not to publish the ground truth annotations for the time being. This test data is extremely rare and costly to produce (both in terms of time and money), as it requires specialized knowledge. In addition, we have not yet determined whether a similar challenge (e.g. PlantCLEF 2026) will be organized. If so, it's important to preserve the integrity of the current test set.
\nThat said, we do plan to publish the ground truth, as soon as we have a comparable alternative test set.
\nBest regards,
\nThe organizing team
Hi, with regard to the paper submission, are there any updates on how should we do it? Thank you in advance.
", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "3198308": "Dear PlantCLEF25 participants,\n\nThank you once again for your incredible efforts in PlantCLEF25!\n\nWe’re reaching out to inform you that **both the competition deadline and the working notes submission deadline have been officially postponed**, due to a delay in the release of the 2025 author instructions. We want to ensure all teams have enough time to prepare their working notes properly. **Once we have the detailed instructions, we will let you know!**\n\n### 🗓️ Updated Timeline:\n- ~~12 May 2025~~ ➡️ **19 May 2025**: Competition Deadline \n- ~~31 May 2025~~ ➡️ **7 June 2025**: Deadline for submission of working note papers by participants *(CEUR-WS proceedings)*\n\nThe remaining deadlines (notification of acceptance and camera-ready submission) are kept the same.\n\nAs a reminder, **all participants** are encouraged to submit a working note detailing their methods and results. Even if you're not in the Top 10. \n\nIf you have any questions, don’t hesitate to ask in this thread.\n\nOn behalf of the organization committee, \n**Lukas Picek**", "3205964": "Hi Organising team, \nNow that the competition has officially concluded, we would like to kindly request the release of the full results. The margins between the top-ranked teams this year were exceptionally narrow. Would it be possible to access detailed metrics similar to those provided last year, such as Macro F1 Averaged Per Plot, Macro F1 Averaged Per Species, and Micro F1? Access to the complete test set ground truth would also be highly valuable for understanding the performance distribution, conducting thorough analysis, and preparing academic publications that accurately reflect the competition outcomes.\n\nMany thanks in advance!\n— Atlantic Team", "3207827": "Hi Steve,\nthank you for your message. We understand your interest in accessing all the tests and appreciate your motivation to conduct more in-depth analyses.\nHowever, we have decided not to publish the ground truth annotations for the time being. This test data is extremely rare and costly to produce (both in terms of time and money), as it requires specialized knowledge. In addition, we have not yet determined whether a similar challenge (e.g. PlantCLEF 2026) will be organized. If so, it's important to preserve the integrity of the current test set.\nThat said, we do plan to publish the ground truth, as soon as we have a comparable alternative test set.\nBest regards,\nThe organizing team", "3208094": "Hi, with regard to the paper submission, are there any updates on how should we do it? Thank you in advance." }, "source": "meta" }