{
  "id": 168063,
  "title": "Found a Patient with Two FVC Readings",
  "url": "/competitions/osic-pulmonary-fibrosis-progression/discussion/168063",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2020-07-19T04:07:21.759114900Z",
  "votes": null,
  "comment_count": 4,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Hi, Guys First real Challenge on Kaggle. Excited for sure.</p>\n<p>Noticed that one of the patients that is a test set patient has two recorded FVCs on the same week. <br>\n(See attached image). Not sure if this is supposed to be like this or if there is supposed to be a way to tell which came first.</p>\n<p>Input much appreciated</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "935066",
      "postDate": "07/19/2020 04:07:21",
      "content": "<p>Hi, Guys First real Challenge on Kaggle. Excited for sure.</p>\n<p>Noticed that one of the patients that is a test set patient has two recorded FVCs on the same week. <br>\n(See attached image). Not sure if this is supposed to be like this or if there is supposed to be a way to tell which came first.</p>\n<p>Input much appreciated</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi, Guys First real Challenge on Kaggle. Excited for sure.\n\nNoticed that one of the patients that is a test set patient has two recorded FVCs on the same week. \n(See attached image). Not sure if this is supposed to be like this or if there is supposed to be a way to tell which came first.\n\nInput much appreciated",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "935887",
      "postDate": "07/19/2020 18:42:20",
      "content": "<p>This means that this patient had two checks in the same week.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "This means that this patient had two checks in the same week.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "935902",
      "postDate": "07/19/2020 18:59:08",
      "content": "<blockquote>\n  <p>This means that this patient had two checks in the same week.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Okay that makes sense. Now for the purposes of the submitting a submission file. Is it an acceptable submission if that patient shows up twice like they do? </p>\n<p>My plan is to use the FVC that were actually measured in the submission file and fill in the others by a model. After taking a look at the training, test and submission files. I figured that would be the goal. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "&gt; This means that this patient had two checks in the same week.\n\nOkay that makes sense. Now for the purposes of the submitting a submission file. Is it an acceptable submission if that patient shows up twice like they do? \n\nMy plan is to use the FVC that were actually measured in the submission file and fill in the others by a model. After taking a look at the training, test and submission files. I figured that would be the goal.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "935982",
      "postDate": "07/19/2020 21:21:11",
      "content": "<p>The test patients are different from the train patients. The public \"test\" patients are just 5 patients from the train dataset and are just used to test that your program is reading the test data correctly.</p>\n\n<p>The real \"test\" data is hidden and has only one FVC reading per patient.</p>\n\n<p>I suspect a submission that creates more than one reading for a given patient in a given week would fail.</p>\n\n<p>-Rich</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "The test patients are different from the train patients. The public \"test\" patients are just 5 patients from the train dataset and are just used to test that your program is reading the test data correctly.\n\nThe real \"test\" data is hidden and has only one FVC reading per patient.\n\nI suspect a submission that creates more than one reading for a given patient in a given week would fail.\n\n-Rich",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "936003",
      "postDate": "07/19/2020 22:00:02",
      "content": "<p>Yes, you should not submit more than one predicted FVC for the same patient and week. The case of having two FVCs in the same week/patient is not existent in the patients used in the evaluation.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Yes, you should not submit more than one predicted FVC for the same patient and week. The case of having two FVCs in the same week/patient is not existent in the patients used in the evaluation.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 935887,
      "author_name": "ahmedhshahin",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "07/19/2020 18:42:20",
      "content": "<p>This means that this patient had two checks in the same week.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 935902,
          "author_name": "prtkbp",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "07/19/2020 18:59:08",
          "content": "<blockquote>\n  <p>This means that this patient had two checks in the same week.</p>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Okay that makes sense. Now for the purposes of the submitting a submission file. Is it an acceptable submission if that patient shows up twice like they do? </p>\n<p>My plan is to use the FVC that were actually measured in the submission file and fill in the others by a model. After taking a look at the training, test and submission files. I figured that would be the goal. </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 935982,
          "author_name": "richardepstein",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "07/19/2020 21:21:11",
          "content": "<p>The test patients are different from the train patients. The public \"test\" patients are just 5 patients from the train dataset and are just used to test that your program is reading the test data correctly.</p>\n\n<p>The real \"test\" data is hidden and has only one FVC reading per patient.</p>\n\n<p>I suspect a submission that creates more than one reading for a given patient in a given week would fail.</p>\n\n<p>-Rich</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 936003,
          "author_name": "ahmedhshahin",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "07/19/2020 22:00:02",
          "content": "<p>Yes, you should not submit more than one predicted FVC for the same patient and week. The case of having two FVCs in the same week/patient is not existent in the patients used in the evaluation.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "935066": "Hi, Guys First real Challenge on Kaggle. Excited for sure.\n\nNoticed that one of the patients that is a test set patient has two recorded FVCs on the same week. \n(See attached image). Not sure if this is supposed to be like this or if there is supposed to be a way to tell which came first.\n\nInput much appreciated",
    "935887": "This means that this patient had two checks in the same week.",
    "935902": "&gt; This means that this patient had two checks in the same week.\n\nOkay that makes sense. Now for the purposes of the submitting a submission file. Is it an acceptable submission if that patient shows up twice like they do? \n\nMy plan is to use the FVC that were actually measured in the submission file and fill in the others by a model. After taking a look at the training, test and submission files. I figured that would be the goal.",
    "935982": "The test patients are different from the train patients. The public \"test\" patients are just 5 patients from the train dataset and are just used to test that your program is reading the test data correctly.\n\nThe real \"test\" data is hidden and has only one FVC reading per patient.\n\nI suspect a submission that creates more than one reading for a given patient in a given week would fail.\n\n-Rich",
    "936003": "Yes, you should not submit more than one predicted FVC for the same patient and week. The case of having two FVCs in the same week/patient is not existent in the patients used in the evaluation."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}