{
  "id": 351713,
  "title": "What is the best way to deal with the CITEseq day 2 / donor 27678 after data updating?",
  "url": "/competitions/open-problems-multimodal/discussion/351713",
  "author_name": "Zhijian Li",
  "post_date": "2022-09-11T14:44:59.725000",
  "votes": 4,
  "comment_count": 0,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>The test data for cite-day2-donor-27678 has been updated, however, according to the organizer's statement, <strong>You should not submit predictions for these new cells</strong>,  meanwhile <strong>You should still submit predictions for these cells, but they will not affect your score. (So just a constant 0.0 is fine</strong>. </p>\n<p>It seems that now the best strategy is to not make any prediction for cite-day2-donor-27678 but just give a constant 0.0. Also, the updated data <code>test_cite_inputs_day_2_donor_27678.h5</code> and <code>metadata_cite_day_2_donor_27678.csv</code> are useless for making prediction.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 1934727,
      "postDate": "2022-09-11T14:44:59.727Z",
      "content": "<p>The test data for cite-day2-donor-27678 has been updated, however, according to the organizer's statement, <strong>You should not submit predictions for these new cells</strong>,  meanwhile <strong>You should still submit predictions for these cells, but they will not affect your score. (So just a constant 0.0 is fine</strong>. </p>\n<p>It seems that now the best strategy is to not make any prediction for cite-day2-donor-27678 but just give a constant 0.0. Also, the updated data <code>test_cite_inputs_day_2_donor_27678.h5</code> and <code>metadata_cite_day_2_donor_27678.csv</code> are useless for making prediction.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "The test data for cite-day2-donor-27678 has been updated, however, according to the organizer's statement, **You should not submit predictions for these new cells**,  meanwhile **You should still submit predictions for these cells, but they will not affect your score. (So just a constant 0.0 is fine**. \n\nIt seems that now the best strategy is to not make any prediction for cite-day2-donor-27678 but just give a constant 0.0. Also, the updated data `test_cite_inputs_day_2_donor_27678.h5` and `metadata_cite_day_2_donor_27678.csv` are useless for making prediction.\n\n\n",
      "votes": 4
    }
  ],
  "comments": [],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1934727": "The test data for cite-day2-donor-27678 has been updated, however, according to the organizer's statement, **You should not submit predictions for these new cells**,  meanwhile **You should still submit predictions for these cells, but they will not affect your score. (So just a constant 0.0 is fine**. \n\nIt seems that now the best strategy is to not make any prediction for cite-day2-donor-27678 but just give a constant 0.0. Also, the updated data `test_cite_inputs_day_2_donor_27678.h5` and `metadata_cite_day_2_donor_27678.csv` are useless for making prediction.\n\n\n"
  }
}