{
  "id": 161417,
  "title": "All my upvotes are gone.",
  "url": "/competitions/jigsaw-multilingual-toxic-comment-classification/discussion/161417",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2020-06-24T20:04:20.228922300Z",
  "votes": 5,
  "comment_count": 8,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>I'm upvoting a ton of topics I had upvoted before.  Not sure what happened.</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "900451",
      "postDate": "06/24/2020 20:04:20",
      "content": "<p>I'm upvoting a ton of topics I had upvoted before.  Not sure what happened.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I'm upvoting a ton of topics I had upvoted before.  Not sure what happened.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "900453",
      "postDate": "06/24/2020 20:06:15",
      "content": "<p>Seems something is wrong, after I upvoted the vote count nis actually down after a page refresh.  Let's wait for tomorrow....</p>\n\n<p>Sorry if my vote disappeared in some topics as a result.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Seems something is wrong, after I upvoted the vote count nis actually down after a page refresh.  Let's wait for tomorrow....\n\nSorry if my vote disappeared in some topics as a result.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "900463",
      "postDate": "06/24/2020 20:16:32",
      "content": "<p>Dear <a href=\"/cpmpml\">@cpmpml</a>,</p>\n\n<p>Perhaps take a look at this: <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/149053\">Bug with the \"Upvote button\"</a>.</p>\n\n<p>All the best,\ncarl</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Dear @cpmpml,\n\nPerhaps take a look at this: [Bug with the \"Upvote button\"](https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/149053).\n\nAll the best,\ncarl",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "900603",
      "postDate": "06/24/2020 23:36:51",
      "content": "<p>I experienced this a couple of days ago when I was reading the top solutions. I had to vote at least 3-4 times and check before it held. So I stopped after reading the 8th place solution.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I experienced this a couple of days ago when I was reading the top solutions. I had to vote at least 3-4 times and check before it held. So I stopped after reading the 8th place solution.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "901451",
      "postDate": "06/25/2020 13:47:14",
      "content": "<p>Never had it before yesterday.  </p>\n\n<p>What is annoying is that when you upvote twice something, the second upvote cancels the previous one.  I had asked for  change and it has been rejected by Kaggle: <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/71210\">https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/71210</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Never had it before yesterday.  \n\nWhat is annoying is that when you upvote twice something, the second upvote cancels the previous one.  I had asked for  change and it has been rejected by Kaggle: https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/71210",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "901491",
      "postDate": "06/25/2020 14:20:49",
      "content": "<p>yep, I too have made a mess of voting for people due to the 'peculiarity' of the button functionality.<br>\nHowever, given that your post is now 2 years old, evidently somebody <em>still</em> thinks it is a good system to keep…</p>\n<p>All the best,<br>\ncarl    </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "yep, I too have made a mess of voting for people due to the 'peculiarity' of the button functionality.\nHowever, given that your post is now 2 years old, evidently somebody *still* thinks it is a good system to keep...\n\nAll the best,\ncarl",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "901655",
      "postDate": "06/25/2020 16:14:51",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for raising attention to this. It's being looked into.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks for raising attention to this. It's being looked into.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "901699",
      "postDate": "06/25/2020 16:32:30",
      "content": "<p>There are definitely known issues with the discussions voting experience. We've been working through a few different issues with it over the past few weeks, and it's possible (likely?) that we may have fixed one issue while regressing another.</p>\n<p>We're on the heels of releasing a feature-parity (i.e. no user-visible changes) rewrite of our discussions codebase that should greatly simplify our voting logic, and hopefully address those.</p>\n<p>In the meantime, feel free to use this thread for any additional reports, or drop them in <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback\" target=\"_blank\">Product Feedback</a>. </p>\n<p>Thanks for your patience, and we hope to have this released within the next few weeks.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "There are definitely known issues with the discussions voting experience. We've been working through a few different issues with it over the past few weeks, and it's possible (likely?) that we may have fixed one issue while regressing another.\n\nWe're on the heels of releasing a feature-parity (i.e. no user-visible changes) rewrite of our discussions codebase that should greatly simplify our voting logic, and hopefully address those.\n\nIn the meantime, feel free to use this thread for any additional reports, or drop them in [Product Feedback](https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback). \n\nThanks for your patience, and we hope to have this released within the next few weeks.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "901709",
      "postDate": "06/25/2020 16:34:11",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"/inversion\">@inversion</a>, I actually 1st noticed this (i.e. disappearing upvotes) in my post <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/jigsaw-multilingual-toxic-comment-classification/discussion/160333\">here</a> during the competition but I thought people were just changing their minds though seemed unsual. It felt that way because the discussion ganered 30+ comments, I even joked about the upvotes in my reply to someone there. So I am glad Kaggle is looking into this.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "inversion, I actually 1st noticed this (i.e. disappearing upvotes) in my post [here](https://www.kaggle.com/c/jigsaw-multilingual-toxic-comment-classification/discussion/160333) during the competition but I thought people were just changing their minds though seemed unsual. It felt that way because the discussion ganered 30+ comments, I even joked about the upvotes in my reply to someone there. So I am glad Kaggle is looking into this.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 901699,
      "author_name": "jeradrose",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/25/2020 16:32:30",
      "content": "<p>There are definitely known issues with the discussions voting experience. We've been working through a few different issues with it over the past few weeks, and it's possible (likely?) that we may have fixed one issue while regressing another.</p>\n<p>We're on the heels of releasing a feature-parity (i.e. no user-visible changes) rewrite of our discussions codebase that should greatly simplify our voting logic, and hopefully address those.</p>\n<p>In the meantime, feel free to use this thread for any additional reports, or drop them in <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback\" target=\"_blank\">Product Feedback</a>. </p>\n<p>Thanks for your patience, and we hope to have this released within the next few weeks.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 900453,
      "author_name": "cpmpml",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/24/2020 20:06:15",
      "content": "<p>Seems something is wrong, after I upvoted the vote count nis actually down after a page refresh.  Let's wait for tomorrow....</p>\n\n<p>Sorry if my vote disappeared in some topics as a result.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 900463,
      "author_name": "carlmcbrideellis",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/24/2020 20:16:32",
      "content": "<p>Dear <a href=\"/cpmpml\">@cpmpml</a>,</p>\n\n<p>Perhaps take a look at this: <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/149053\">Bug with the \"Upvote button\"</a>.</p>\n\n<p>All the best,\ncarl</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 901451,
          "author_name": "cpmpml",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "06/25/2020 13:47:14",
          "content": "<p>Never had it before yesterday.  </p>\n\n<p>What is annoying is that when you upvote twice something, the second upvote cancels the previous one.  I had asked for  change and it has been rejected by Kaggle: <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/71210\">https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/71210</a></p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 901491,
          "author_name": "carlmcbrideellis",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "06/25/2020 14:20:49",
          "content": "<p>yep, I too have made a mess of voting for people due to the 'peculiarity' of the button functionality.<br>\nHowever, given that your post is now 2 years old, evidently somebody <em>still</em> thinks it is a good system to keep…</p>\n<p>All the best,<br>\ncarl    </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 900603,
      "author_name": "sheriytm",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/24/2020 23:36:51",
      "content": "<p>I experienced this a couple of days ago when I was reading the top solutions. I had to vote at least 3-4 times and check before it held. So I stopped after reading the 8th place solution.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 901655,
      "author_name": "inversion",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "06/25/2020 16:14:51",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for raising attention to this. It's being looked into.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 901709,
          "author_name": "sheriytm",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "06/25/2020 16:34:11",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"/inversion\">@inversion</a>, I actually 1st noticed this (i.e. disappearing upvotes) in my post <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/jigsaw-multilingual-toxic-comment-classification/discussion/160333\">here</a> during the competition but I thought people were just changing their minds though seemed unsual. It felt that way because the discussion ganered 30+ comments, I even joked about the upvotes in my reply to someone there. So I am glad Kaggle is looking into this.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "900451": "I'm upvoting a ton of topics I had upvoted before.  Not sure what happened.",
    "900453": "Seems something is wrong, after I upvoted the vote count nis actually down after a page refresh.  Let's wait for tomorrow....\n\nSorry if my vote disappeared in some topics as a result.",
    "900463": "Dear @cpmpml,\n\nPerhaps take a look at this: [Bug with the \"Upvote button\"](https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/149053).\n\nAll the best,\ncarl",
    "900603": "I experienced this a couple of days ago when I was reading the top solutions. I had to vote at least 3-4 times and check before it held. So I stopped after reading the 8th place solution.",
    "901451": "Never had it before yesterday.  \n\nWhat is annoying is that when you upvote twice something, the second upvote cancels the previous one.  I had asked for  change and it has been rejected by Kaggle: https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback/71210",
    "901491": "yep, I too have made a mess of voting for people due to the 'peculiarity' of the button functionality.\nHowever, given that your post is now 2 years old, evidently somebody *still* thinks it is a good system to keep...\n\nAll the best,\ncarl",
    "901655": "Thanks for raising attention to this. It's being looked into.",
    "901699": "There are definitely known issues with the discussions voting experience. We've been working through a few different issues with it over the past few weeks, and it's possible (likely?) that we may have fixed one issue while regressing another.\n\nWe're on the heels of releasing a feature-parity (i.e. no user-visible changes) rewrite of our discussions codebase that should greatly simplify our voting logic, and hopefully address those.\n\nIn the meantime, feel free to use this thread for any additional reports, or drop them in [Product Feedback](https://www.kaggle.com/product-feedback). \n\nThanks for your patience, and we hope to have this released within the next few weeks.",
    "901709": "inversion, I actually 1st noticed this (i.e. disappearing upvotes) in my post [here](https://www.kaggle.com/c/jigsaw-multilingual-toxic-comment-classification/discussion/160333) during the competition but I thought people were just changing their minds though seemed unsual. It felt that way because the discussion ganered 30+ comments, I even joked about the upvotes in my reply to someone there. So I am glad Kaggle is looking into this."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}