{ "id": 220973, "title": "Floor mapping 🎭", "url": "/competitions/indoor-location-navigation/discussion/220973", "author_name": "chandryl paterne BITEGHE", "post_date": "2021-02-20T10:27:00.918000", "votes": 1, "comment_count": 4, "views": 0, "content": "

Hi guys,
\nmaybe i am wrong but the competiton doesn't give us the full mapping or floors level and integer. Moreover there are some floors that will not be in the test set.
\nDo you have any idea about the google mapping ? is F1 =L1 = 1F ??

\n

I built a notebook where we discuss about it, feel free a lets a suggestion
\n⏬
\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/chandrylpaternetony/data-descript-outlier-detect-floor-mapping

", "messages": [ { "id": 1221286, "postDate": "2021-02-28T20:57:35.063Z", "content": "

And as for the weird ones like L1, these don't seem to appear in the 24 sites included in the test set.

", "rawMarkdown": "And as for the weird ones like L1, these don't seem to appear in the 24 sites included in the test set.", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 1221425, "postDate": "2021-03-01T00:50:04.517Z", "content": "

It is just as you say @paulfornia, the Evaluation tab tells us that \"There are other floor names in the training data, e.g., LG2, LM, etc., which you may decide to use for training, but none of these non-standard floors are found in the test set.\"

", "rawMarkdown": "It is just as you say @paulfornia, the Evaluation tab tells us that \"There are other floor names in the training data, e.g., LG2, LM, etc., which you may decide to use for training, but none of these non-standard floors are found in the test set.\"", "votes": 1 } ] }, { "id": 1211621, "postDate": "2021-02-20T11:25:46.680Z", "content": "

Just in case there's any confusion, we are told at https://www.kaggle.com/c/indoor-location-navigation/overview/evaluation that the correct floor number mapping is:

\n

B2, 2B => -2
\nB1, 1B => -1
\nF1, 1F => 0
\nF2, 2F =>1
\nF3, 3F => 2
\nF4, 4F => 3
\netc.

", "rawMarkdown": "Just in case there's any confusion, we are told at https://www.kaggle.com/c/indoor-location-navigation/overview/evaluation that the correct floor number mapping is:\n\nB2, 2B => -2\nB1, 1B => -1\nF1, 1F => 0\nF2, 2F =>1\nF3, 3F => 2\nF4, 4F => 3\netc.", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 1244201, "postDate": "2021-03-18T19:04:59.820Z", "rawMarkdown": "", "votes": 2, "isDeleted": true } ] }, { "id": 1211558, "postDate": "2021-02-20T10:27:00.917Z", "content": "

Hi guys,
\nmaybe i am wrong but the competiton doesn't give us the full mapping or floors level and integer. Moreover there are some floors that will not be in the test set.
\nDo you have any idea about the google mapping ? is F1 =L1 = 1F ??

\n

I built a notebook where we discuss about it, feel free a lets a suggestion
\n⏬
\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/chandrylpaternetony/data-descript-outlier-detect-floor-mapping

", "rawMarkdown": "Hi guys,\nmaybe i am wrong but the competiton doesn't give us the full mapping or floors level and integer. Moreover there are some floors that will not be in the test set.\nDo you have any idea about the google mapping ? is F1 =L1 = 1F ??\n\nI built a notebook where we discuss about it, feel free a lets a suggestion \n⏬\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/chandrylpaternetony/data-descript-outlier-detect-floor-mapping", "votes": 1 } ], "comments": [ { "id": 1221286, "author_name": "Paul Fornia", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2021-02-28T20:57:35.063000", "content": "

And as for the weird ones like L1, these don't seem to appear in the 24 sites included in the test set.

", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 1221425, "author_name": "John Mitchell", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2021-03-01T00:50:04.517000", "content": "

It is just as you say @paulfornia, the Evaluation tab tells us that \"There are other floor names in the training data, e.g., LG2, LM, etc., which you may decide to use for training, but none of these non-standard floors are found in the test set.\"

", "votes": 1, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 1211621, "author_name": "John Mitchell", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2021-02-20T11:25:46.680000", "content": "

Just in case there's any confusion, we are told at https://www.kaggle.com/c/indoor-location-navigation/overview/evaluation that the correct floor number mapping is:

\n

B2, 2B => -2
\nB1, 1B => -1
\nF1, 1F => 0
\nF2, 2F =>1
\nF3, 3F => 2
\nF4, 4F => 3
\netc.

", "votes": 1, "replies": [ { "id": 1244201, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2021-03-18T19:04:59.820000", "content": "", "votes": 2, "replies": [] } ] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "1221286": "And as for the weird ones like L1, these don't seem to appear in the 24 sites included in the test set.", "1211621": "Just in case there's any confusion, we are told at https://www.kaggle.com/c/indoor-location-navigation/overview/evaluation that the correct floor number mapping is:\n\nB2, 2B => -2\nB1, 1B => -1\nF1, 1F => 0\nF2, 2F =>1\nF3, 3F => 2\nF4, 4F => 3\netc.", "1211558": "Hi guys,\nmaybe i am wrong but the competiton doesn't give us the full mapping or floors level and integer. Moreover there are some floors that will not be in the test set.\nDo you have any idea about the google mapping ? is F1 =L1 = 1F ??\n\nI built a notebook where we discuss about it, feel free a lets a suggestion \n⏬\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/chandrylpaternetony/data-descript-outlier-detect-floor-mapping" } }