After careful review, the top three winners of the competition are as follows:
\n1st USTC-IAT-United @gongpengzhao
\n2nd Duong Anh Kiet @fdfyaytkt
\n3rd wwwyyyjjjj @wwwyyyjjjj
(Results are based on mAP@50 and mAP@all. No matter mAP@50 or mAP@all, the rankings are the same. But it seems that the results for mAP@all are very low, so we did not provide the final scores as last year.)
\nCongratulations to the winners for their outstanding performance!
\nAs mentioned in rule-5:
\nThe top three participating users/groups (results are based on Rule-4) have to make their methods and codes public and provide the corresponding GitHub links by May 23 (11:59 PM).
Just like other Kaggle competitions, you only need to openly share your method in the discussion forum along with a GitHub link. And there is no need to submit a technical report. Thank you.
\nThe deadline can be extended until May 24(11:59 PM UTC).
", "messages": [ { "id": 2827197, "postDate": "2024-05-21T09:47:47.170Z", "content": "After careful review, the top three winners of the competition are as follows:
\n1st USTC-IAT-United @gongpengzhao
\n2nd Duong Anh Kiet @fdfyaytkt
\n3rd wwwyyyjjjj @wwwyyyjjjj
(Results are based on mAP@50 and mAP@all. No matter mAP@50 or mAP@all, the rankings are the same. But it seems that the results for mAP@all are very low, so we did not provide the final scores as last year.)
\nCongratulations to the winners for their outstanding performance!
\nAs mentioned in rule-5:
\nThe top three participating users/groups (results are based on Rule-4) have to make their methods and codes public and provide the corresponding GitHub links by May 23 (11:59 PM).
Just like other Kaggle competitions, you only need to openly share your method in the discussion forum along with a GitHub link. And there is no need to submit a technical report. Thank you.
\nThe deadline can be extended until May 24(11:59 PM UTC).
", "rawMarkdown": "After careful review, the top three winners of the competition are as follows:\n\n1st USTC-IAT-United @gongpengzhao \n2nd Duong Anh Kiet @fdfyaytkt \n3rd wwwyyyjjjj @wwwyyyjjjj \n\n(Results are based on mAP@50 and mAP@all. No matter mAP@50 or mAP@all, the rankings are the same. But it seems that the results for mAP@all are very low, so we did not provide the final scores as last year.)\n\nCongratulations to the winners for their outstanding performance!\n\nAs mentioned in rule-5:\nThe top three participating users/groups (results are based on Rule-4) have to make their methods and codes public and provide the corresponding GitHub links by May 23 (11:59 PM).\n\nJust like other Kaggle competitions, you only need to openly share your method in the discussion forum along with a GitHub link. And there is no need to submit a technical report. Thank you.\n\nThe deadline can be extended until May 24(11:59 PM UTC)." } ], "comments": [], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "2827197": "After careful review, the top three winners of the competition are as follows:\n\n1st USTC-IAT-United @gongpengzhao \n2nd Duong Anh Kiet @fdfyaytkt \n3rd wwwyyyjjjj @wwwyyyjjjj \n\n(Results are based on mAP@50 and mAP@all. No matter mAP@50 or mAP@all, the rankings are the same. But it seems that the results for mAP@all are very low, so we did not provide the final scores as last year.)\n\nCongratulations to the winners for their outstanding performance!\n\nAs mentioned in rule-5:\nThe top three participating users/groups (results are based on Rule-4) have to make their methods and codes public and provide the corresponding GitHub links by May 23 (11:59 PM).\n\nJust like other Kaggle competitions, you only need to openly share your method in the discussion forum along with a GitHub link. And there is no need to submit a technical report. Thank you.\n\nThe deadline can be extended until May 24(11:59 PM UTC)." } }