{
  "id": 200070,
  "title": "Some small annotation mistakes ?",
  "url": "/competitions/hubmap-kidney-segmentation/discussion/200070",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2020-11-28T16:44:15.064330500Z",
  "votes": 14,
  "comment_count": 4,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Hi !</p>\n<p>I just noticed from the annotations in json 5 anomalies, see the figure below (annotations + 500px context around). Title represent id as well as the number of the annotation identified:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1161354%2F4a885234425764e35f0fe116fc581465%2FSans%20titre.png?generation=1606581642052016&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"\"></p>\n<p>These 5 glomeruli annotated are way much smaller than all the other ones, and don't target a proper glomerulus (if I had to guess.. But I am not an expert in the field😄 )</p>\n<p>For now, I am working mainly based on these json annotations. I wanted to know as well if those matches the encoding masks used for the scoring ?</p>\n<p>Thanks !</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "1094486",
      "postDate": "11/28/2020 16:44:15",
      "content": "<p>Hi !</p>\n<p>I just noticed from the annotations in json 5 anomalies, see the figure below (annotations + 500px context around). Title represent id as well as the number of the annotation identified:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1161354%2F4a885234425764e35f0fe116fc581465%2FSans%20titre.png?generation=1606581642052016&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"\"></p>\n<p>These 5 glomeruli annotated are way much smaller than all the other ones, and don't target a proper glomerulus (if I had to guess.. But I am not an expert in the field😄 )</p>\n<p>For now, I am working mainly based on these json annotations. I wanted to know as well if those matches the encoding masks used for the scoring ?</p>\n<p>Thanks !</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi !\n\nI just noticed from the annotations in json 5 anomalies, see the figure below (annotations + 500px context around). Title represent id as well as the number of the annotation identified:\n\n ![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1161354%2F4a885234425764e35f0fe116fc581465%2FSans%20titre.png?generation=1606581642052016&alt=media)\n\nThese 5 glomeruli annotated are way much smaller than all the other ones, and don't target a proper glomerulus (if I had to guess.. But I am not an expert in the field😄 )\n\nFor now, I am working mainly based on these json annotations. I wanted to know as well if those matches the encoding masks used for the scoring ?\n\nThanks !",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1099017",
      "postDate": "12/02/2020 02:52:34",
      "content": "<p>I found these examples too. I think it's best to exclude all glomeruli outside of the cortex.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I found these examples too. I think it's best to exclude all glomeruli outside of the cortex.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1100568",
      "postDate": "12/03/2020 06:48:42",
      "content": "<p>I have the same doubts</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I have the same doubts",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1101805",
      "postDate": "12/04/2020 09:30:14",
      "content": "<p>I also found some other glomerulus with strange shape like this one:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1161354%2Fde4a6d0228647b81eb78bf2f175638ba%2FSans%20titre.png?generation=1607074188254195&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"\"></p>\n<p>There is maybe 10 like this in total in the full training set, I am not sure it is relevant to keep them. Any thought about it ?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I also found some other glomerulus with strange shape like this one:\n\n![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1161354%2Fde4a6d0228647b81eb78bf2f175638ba%2FSans%20titre.png?generation=1607074188254195&alt=media)\n\nThere is maybe 10 like this in total in the full training set, I am not sure it is relevant to keep them. Any thought about it ?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1101945",
      "postDate": "12/04/2020 12:46:10",
      "content": "<p>Anyone meets this kind data?  <img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F347724%2F540e379634e71fc57a2819c84e159d7e%2F1111.png?generation=1607086097879768&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"\"></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Anyone meets this kind data?  ![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F347724%2F540e379634e71fc57a2819c84e159d7e%2F1111.png?generation=1607086097879768&alt=media)",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1099017,
      "author_name": "matthewmasters",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "12/02/2020 02:52:34",
      "content": "<p>I found these examples too. I think it's best to exclude all glomeruli outside of the cortex.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1100568,
      "author_name": "zzemily",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "12/03/2020 06:48:42",
      "content": "<p>I have the same doubts</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1101805,
      "author_name": "bowaka",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "12/04/2020 09:30:14",
      "content": "<p>I also found some other glomerulus with strange shape like this one:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1161354%2Fde4a6d0228647b81eb78bf2f175638ba%2FSans%20titre.png?generation=1607074188254195&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"\"></p>\n<p>There is maybe 10 like this in total in the full training set, I am not sure it is relevant to keep them. Any thought about it ?</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1101945,
      "author_name": "cswwp347724",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "12/04/2020 12:46:10",
      "content": "<p>Anyone meets this kind data?  <img src=\"https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F347724%2F540e379634e71fc57a2819c84e159d7e%2F1111.png?generation=1607086097879768&amp;alt=media\" alt=\"\"></p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1094486": "Hi !\n\nI just noticed from the annotations in json 5 anomalies, see the figure below (annotations + 500px context around). Title represent id as well as the number of the annotation identified:\n\n ![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1161354%2F4a885234425764e35f0fe116fc581465%2FSans%20titre.png?generation=1606581642052016&alt=media)\n\nThese 5 glomeruli annotated are way much smaller than all the other ones, and don't target a proper glomerulus (if I had to guess.. But I am not an expert in the field😄 )\n\nFor now, I am working mainly based on these json annotations. I wanted to know as well if those matches the encoding masks used for the scoring ?\n\nThanks !",
    "1099017": "I found these examples too. I think it's best to exclude all glomeruli outside of the cortex.",
    "1100568": "I have the same doubts",
    "1101805": "I also found some other glomerulus with strange shape like this one:\n\n![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F1161354%2Fde4a6d0228647b81eb78bf2f175638ba%2FSans%20titre.png?generation=1607074188254195&alt=media)\n\nThere is maybe 10 like this in total in the full training set, I am not sure it is relevant to keep them. Any thought about it ?",
    "1101945": "Anyone meets this kind data?  ![](https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-forum-message-attachments/o/inbox%2F347724%2F540e379634e71fc57a2819c84e159d7e%2F1111.png?generation=1607086097879768&alt=media)"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}