{
  "id": 307287,
  "title": "Resized images 512",
  "url": "/competitions/happy-whale-and-dolphin/discussion/307287",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2022-02-13T16:23:01.386181400Z",
  "votes": 7,
  "comment_count": 5,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Here is the dataset with resized images to 512 width.<br>\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/bdsaglam/happy-whale-512\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/bdsaglam/happy-whale-512</a></p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "1688455",
      "postDate": "02/13/2022 16:23:01",
      "content": "<p>Here is the dataset with resized images to 512 width.<br>\n<a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/bdsaglam/happy-whale-512\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/bdsaglam/happy-whale-512</a></p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Here is the dataset with resized images to 512 width.\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/bdsaglam/happy-whale-512",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1688910",
      "postDate": "02/13/2022 22:07:19",
      "content": "<p>A lot of people already published the squared images. As for me, better to publish something not-trivial, e.g. rectangle images, because in the previous Happywhale competition it worked better in many cases. But, thank you, <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/bdsaglam\" target=\"_blank\">@bdsaglam</a>!</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "A lot of people already published the squared images. As for me, better to publish something not-trivial, e.g. rectangle images, because in the previous Happywhale competition it worked better in many cases. But, thank you, @bdsaglam!",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1688916",
      "postDate": "02/13/2022 22:09:03",
      "content": "<p>Your dataset is nearly to be \"rectangled\", but we still should do resizing (height).</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Your dataset is nearly to be \"rectangled\", but we still should do resizing (height).",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1689340",
      "postDate": "02/14/2022 06:56:51",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for Sharing!</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks for Sharing!",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1689435",
      "postDate": "02/14/2022 08:19:26",
      "content": "<p>Yes, I didn't want to alter the aspect ratio and since most of the images have an aspect ratio higher than 1, I resized the widths to 512. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Yes, I didn't want to alter the aspect ratio and since most of the images have an aspect ratio higher than 1, I resized the widths to 512.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1689562",
      "postDate": "02/14/2022 10:25:06",
      "content": "<p>looks like some images are either missing or corrupt, at least this particular one <br>\n/input/happy-whale-512/train_images/0d9099681af434.jpg </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "looks like some images are either missing or corrupt, at least this particular one \n/input/happy-whale-512/train_images/0d9099681af434.jpg",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1688910,
      "author_name": "vad13irt",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "02/13/2022 22:07:19",
      "content": "<p>A lot of people already published the squared images. As for me, better to publish something not-trivial, e.g. rectangle images, because in the previous Happywhale competition it worked better in many cases. But, thank you, <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/bdsaglam\" target=\"_blank\">@bdsaglam</a>!</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1688916,
          "author_name": "vad13irt",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "02/13/2022 22:09:03",
          "content": "<p>Your dataset is nearly to be \"rectangled\", but we still should do resizing (height).</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1689435,
          "author_name": "bdsaglam",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "02/14/2022 08:19:26",
          "content": "<p>Yes, I didn't want to alter the aspect ratio and since most of the images have an aspect ratio higher than 1, I resized the widths to 512. </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1689340,
      "author_name": "ashwincheekati",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "02/14/2022 06:56:51",
      "content": "<p>Thanks for Sharing!</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1689562,
      "author_name": "ashwincheekati",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "02/14/2022 10:25:06",
      "content": "<p>looks like some images are either missing or corrupt, at least this particular one <br>\n/input/happy-whale-512/train_images/0d9099681af434.jpg </p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1688455": "Here is the dataset with resized images to 512 width.\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/bdsaglam/happy-whale-512",
    "1688910": "A lot of people already published the squared images. As for me, better to publish something not-trivial, e.g. rectangle images, because in the previous Happywhale competition it worked better in many cases. But, thank you, @bdsaglam!",
    "1688916": "Your dataset is nearly to be \"rectangled\", but we still should do resizing (height).",
    "1689340": "Thanks for Sharing!",
    "1689435": "Yes, I didn't want to alter the aspect ratio and since most of the images have an aspect ratio higher than 1, I resized the widths to 512.",
    "1689562": "looks like some images are either missing or corrupt, at least this particular one \n/input/happy-whale-512/train_images/0d9099681af434.jpg"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}