{
  "id": 272636,
  "title": "Break Single Model  CV 87.6+ Wall",
  "url": "/competitions/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/272636",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2021-09-16T13:30:45.416864300Z",
  "votes": 9,
  "comment_count": 10,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Is hengs  suggestion over CQT parameters  given in his great discussion sufficient to reach single model cv of 87.8 ?<br>\nDiscussion  gives advise on best CQT parameters  that  paves way for even smaller models reaching  to score of High end models.</p>\n<p>However Is any one  after following that discussion able to reach CV of 87.8  except heng :) ?<br>\ni think merely adjusting CQT parameters is insufficient to reach  milestone CV  of 87.8 needed to stand with Gold on Private LB.</p>\n<p>Inviting your opinions..</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "1514851",
      "postDate": "09/16/2021 13:30:45",
      "content": "<p>Is hengs  suggestion over CQT parameters  given in his great discussion sufficient to reach single model cv of 87.8 ?<br>\nDiscussion  gives advise on best CQT parameters  that  paves way for even smaller models reaching  to score of High end models.</p>\n<p>However Is any one  after following that discussion able to reach CV of 87.8  except heng :) ?<br>\ni think merely adjusting CQT parameters is insufficient to reach  milestone CV  of 87.8 needed to stand with Gold on Private LB.</p>\n<p>Inviting your opinions..</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Is hengs  suggestion over CQT parameters  given in his great discussion sufficient to reach single model cv of 87.8 ?\nDiscussion  gives advise on best CQT parameters  that  paves way for even smaller models reaching  to score of High end models.\n\nHowever Is any one  after following that discussion able to reach CV of 87.8  except heng :) ?\ni think merely adjusting CQT parameters is insufficient to reach  milestone CV  of 87.8 needed to stand with Gold on Private LB.\n\nInviting your opinions..",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1514908",
      "postDate": "09/16/2021 14:35:26",
      "content": "<p>Not related directly to CQT parameters  but if if you adjust the normalization my score goes from 0.8766 to 0.8790. Also what do you mean by heng ?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Not related directly to CQT parameters  but if if you adjust the normalization my score goes from 0.8766 to 0.8790. Also what do you mean by heng ?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1514926",
      "postDate": "09/16/2021 14:58:30",
      "content": "<p>Is this your single model score?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Is this your single model score?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1514929",
      "postDate": "09/16/2021 15:01:56",
      "content": "<p>Yes. its my single model score</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Yes. its my single model score",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1514941",
      "postDate": "09/16/2021 15:12:36",
      "content": "<p>Whats your Single model score ?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Whats your Single model score ?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1514984",
      "postDate": "09/16/2021 16:01:16",
      "content": "<p>what do you mean by <code>adjust normalization</code>? you mean sth like<code>img=/255.0</code>?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "what do you mean by `adjust normalization`? you mean sth like`img=/255.0`?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1515002",
      "postDate": "09/16/2021 16:21:40",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/mithilsalunkhe\" target=\"_blank\">@mithilsalunkhe</a> ours scores 87.71 . Experimenting with more preprocessing methods.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "mithilsalunkhe ours scores 87.71 . Experimenting with more preprocessing methods.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1515207",
      "postDate": "09/16/2021 19:44:54",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/mithilsalunkhe\" target=\"_blank\">@mithilsalunkhe</a> Did you mean scalogram normalization or raw signal?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "mithilsalunkhe Did you mean scalogram normalization or raw signal?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1515345",
      "postDate": "09/17/2021 03:05:53",
      "content": "<p>I mean the Raw signal </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I mean the Raw signal",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1515354",
      "postDate": "09/17/2021 03:18:16",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/pot3823\" target=\"_blank\">@pot3823</a> no i mean the raw signal.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "pot3823 no i mean the raw signal.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1559719",
      "postDate": "10/27/2021 07:09:11",
      "content": "<p>Hey All,</p>\n<p>Thank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey <a href=\"https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5\" target=\"_blank\">https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5</a>.</p>\n<p>Thank you all,</p>\n<p>Regards,<br>\nChris</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hey All,\n\nThank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5.\n\nThank you all,\n\nRegards,\nChris",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1514908,
      "author_name": "mithilsalunkhe",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/16/2021 14:35:26",
      "content": "<p>Not related directly to CQT parameters  but if if you adjust the normalization my score goes from 0.8766 to 0.8790. Also what do you mean by heng ?</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1514926,
          "author_name": "jaideepvalani",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/16/2021 14:58:30",
          "content": "<p>Is this your single model score?</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1514929,
          "author_name": "mithilsalunkhe",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/16/2021 15:01:56",
          "content": "<p>Yes. its my single model score</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1514941,
          "author_name": "mithilsalunkhe",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/16/2021 15:12:36",
          "content": "<p>Whats your Single model score ?</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1514984,
          "author_name": "kfk42kfk",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/16/2021 16:01:16",
          "content": "<p>what do you mean by <code>adjust normalization</code>? you mean sth like<code>img=/255.0</code>?</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1515002,
          "author_name": "jaideepvalani",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/16/2021 16:21:40",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/mithilsalunkhe\" target=\"_blank\">@mithilsalunkhe</a> ours scores 87.71 . Experimenting with more preprocessing methods.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1515207,
          "author_name": "sggpls",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/16/2021 19:44:54",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/mithilsalunkhe\" target=\"_blank\">@mithilsalunkhe</a> Did you mean scalogram normalization or raw signal?</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1515345,
          "author_name": "mithilsalunkhe",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/17/2021 03:05:53",
          "content": "<p>I mean the Raw signal </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1515354,
          "author_name": "mithilsalunkhe",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/17/2021 03:18:16",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/pot3823\" target=\"_blank\">@pot3823</a> no i mean the raw signal.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1559719,
      "author_name": "zerafachris",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/27/2021 07:09:11",
      "content": "<p>Hey All,</p>\n<p>Thank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey <a href=\"https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5\" target=\"_blank\">https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5</a>.</p>\n<p>Thank you all,</p>\n<p>Regards,<br>\nChris</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1514851": "Is hengs  suggestion over CQT parameters  given in his great discussion sufficient to reach single model cv of 87.8 ?\nDiscussion  gives advise on best CQT parameters  that  paves way for even smaller models reaching  to score of High end models.\n\nHowever Is any one  after following that discussion able to reach CV of 87.8  except heng :) ?\ni think merely adjusting CQT parameters is insufficient to reach  milestone CV  of 87.8 needed to stand with Gold on Private LB.\n\nInviting your opinions..",
    "1514908": "Not related directly to CQT parameters  but if if you adjust the normalization my score goes from 0.8766 to 0.8790. Also what do you mean by heng ?",
    "1514926": "Is this your single model score?",
    "1514929": "Yes. its my single model score",
    "1514941": "Whats your Single model score ?",
    "1514984": "what do you mean by `adjust normalization`? you mean sth like`img=/255.0`?",
    "1515002": "mithilsalunkhe ours scores 87.71 . Experimenting with more preprocessing methods.",
    "1515207": "mithilsalunkhe Did you mean scalogram normalization or raw signal?",
    "1515345": "I mean the Raw signal",
    "1515354": "pot3823 no i mean the raw signal.",
    "1559719": "Hey All,\n\nThank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5.\n\nThank you all,\n\nRegards,\nChris"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}