{
  "id": 270784,
  "title": "Is the third detector helpful?",
  "url": "/competitions/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/270784",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2021-09-07T02:00:44.669518600Z",
  "votes": 5,
  "comment_count": 3,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Hello guys, wanted to share some thoughts of the team:</p>\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Is a third detector helpful? it looks very noisy. Perhaps it can either be thrown away or cleaned of noise. As far as I can see from the data visualization and papers, probably we are mainly interested in the range 30-400Hz, so one can try to cut the rest. Or leave only the frequencies that occur in the 1st and 2d observations. </p>\n</blockquote>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "1505136",
      "postDate": "09/07/2021 02:00:44",
      "content": "<p>Hello guys, wanted to share some thoughts of the team:</p>\n<blockquote>\n  <p>Is a third detector helpful? it looks very noisy. Perhaps it can either be thrown away or cleaned of noise. As far as I can see from the data visualization and papers, probably we are mainly interested in the range 30-400Hz, so one can try to cut the rest. Or leave only the frequencies that occur in the 1st and 2d observations. </p>\n</blockquote>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hello guys, wanted to share some thoughts of the team:\n> Is a third detector helpful? it looks very noisy. Perhaps it can either be thrown away or cleaned of noise. As far as I can see from the data visualization and papers, probably we are mainly interested in the range 30-400Hz, so one can try to cut the rest. Or leave only the frequencies that occur in the 1st and 2d observations.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1505146",
      "postDate": "09/07/2021 02:08:24",
      "content": "<p>Hi <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/pavfedotov\" target=\"_blank\">@pavfedotov</a> </p>\n<p>I'd recommend taking a look at <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/251361\" target=\"_blank\">this thread</a> from very early on during the competition. Tl;dr, you'll def want to be keeping that third detector. Further from my visualizations, there are actually occurrences where the gw signal is <em>only</em> visible (by eye) in the third detector.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi @pavfedotov \n\nI'd recommend taking a look at [this thread](https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/251361) from very early on during the competition. Tl;dr, you'll def want to be keeping that third detector. Further from my visualizations, there are actually occurrences where the gw signal is *only* visible (by eye) in the third detector.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1505588",
      "postDate": "09/07/2021 11:51:11",
      "content": "<p>Short answer is yes.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Short answer is yes.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1559966",
      "postDate": "10/27/2021 08:39:10",
      "content": "<p>Hey All,</p>\n<p>Thank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey <a href=\"https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5\" target=\"_blank\">https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5</a>.</p>\n<p>Thank you all,</p>\n<p>Regards,<br>\nChris</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hey All,\n\nThank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5.\n\nThank you all,\n\nRegards,\nChris",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1505146,
      "author_name": "authman",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/07/2021 02:08:24",
      "content": "<p>Hi <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/pavfedotov\" target=\"_blank\">@pavfedotov</a> </p>\n<p>I'd recommend taking a look at <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/251361\" target=\"_blank\">this thread</a> from very early on during the competition. Tl;dr, you'll def want to be keeping that third detector. Further from my visualizations, there are actually occurrences where the gw signal is <em>only</em> visible (by eye) in the third detector.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1505588,
      "author_name": "cpmpml",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/07/2021 11:51:11",
      "content": "<p>Short answer is yes.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 1559966,
      "author_name": "zerafachris",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/27/2021 08:39:10",
      "content": "<p>Hey All,</p>\n<p>Thank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey <a href=\"https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5\" target=\"_blank\">https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5</a>.</p>\n<p>Thank you all,</p>\n<p>Regards,<br>\nChris</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1505136": "Hello guys, wanted to share some thoughts of the team:\n> Is a third detector helpful? it looks very noisy. Perhaps it can either be thrown away or cleaned of noise. As far as I can see from the data visualization and papers, probably we are mainly interested in the range 30-400Hz, so one can try to cut the rest. Or leave only the frequencies that occur in the 1st and 2d observations.",
    "1505146": "Hi @pavfedotov \n\nI'd recommend taking a look at [this thread](https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/251361) from very early on during the competition. Tl;dr, you'll def want to be keeping that third detector. Further from my visualizations, there are actually occurrences where the gw signal is *only* visible (by eye) in the third detector.",
    "1505588": "Short answer is yes.",
    "1559966": "Hey All,\n\nThank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5.\n\nThank you all,\n\nRegards,\nChris"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}