{
  "id": 268776,
  "title": "Where is Signal ? ",
  "url": "/competitions/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/268776",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2021-08-28T20:45:32.112014200Z",
  "votes": 8,
  "comment_count": 6,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p><strong>Easy (7945e449f3)</strong><br>\n<img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/WgJcrYM/easy.png\" alt=\"(https://ibb.co/Ln7CT2c\"></p>\n<p><strong>Hard - Almost no signal (00000e74ad)</strong><br>\n<img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/Np8D0jD/hard.png\" alt=\"https://ibb.co/4M6vbTv\"></p>\n<p>is it an outlier ? or is my pre-processing wrong?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "1494610",
      "postDate": "08/28/2021 20:45:32",
      "content": "<p><strong>Easy (7945e449f3)</strong><br>\n<img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/WgJcrYM/easy.png\" alt=\"(https://ibb.co/Ln7CT2c\"></p>\n<p><strong>Hard - Almost no signal (00000e74ad)</strong><br>\n<img src=\"https://i.ibb.co/Np8D0jD/hard.png\" alt=\"https://ibb.co/4M6vbTv\"></p>\n<p>is it an outlier ? or is my pre-processing wrong?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "**Easy (7945e449f3)**\n![(https://ibb.co/Ln7CT2c](https://i.ibb.co/WgJcrYM/easy.png)\n\n**Hard - Almost no signal (00000e74ad)**\n![https://ibb.co/4M6vbTv](https://i.ibb.co/Np8D0jD/hard.png)\n\nis it an outlier ? or is my pre-processing wrong?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1494995",
      "postDate": "08/29/2021 08:07:58",
      "content": "<p>Indeed, the signal isn't always very distinct and the challenge here is to find good processing/model that will remove the noise (or at least reduce it). </p>\n<p>Check this other discussion for more details: <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/268127\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/268127</a>. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Indeed, the signal isn't always very distinct and the challenge here is to find good processing/model that will remove the noise (or at least reduce it). \n\nCheck this other discussion for more details: https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/268127.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1495000",
      "postDate": "08/29/2021 08:17:35",
      "content": "<p>Thanks, I will go through it <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/yassinealouini\" target=\"_blank\">@yassinealouini</a> </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks, I will go through it @yassinealouini",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1496741",
      "postDate": "08/30/2021 15:44:07",
      "content": "<p>yeah i think thats true</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "yeah i think thats true",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1498441",
      "postDate": "09/01/2021 01:50:56",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/seshurajup\" target=\"_blank\">@seshurajup</a> you are spot on. The samples have significant variation in the signal to noise ratio and in many cases the GW event is buried in the noise. This is the challenge we have been given to find that GW signal when the SNR is very low.   </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "seshurajup you are spot on. The samples have significant variation in the signal to noise ratio and in many cases the GW event is buried in the noise. This is the challenge we have been given to find that GW signal when the SNR is very low.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1498481",
      "postDate": "09/01/2021 02:34:55",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/kevinmcisaac\" target=\"_blank\">@kevinmcisaac</a> Thanks for the explanation. It is clear after <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/hengck23\" target=\"_blank\">@hengck23</a> shared positive vs negative samples distribution.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "kevinmcisaac Thanks for the explanation. It is clear after @hengck23 shared positive vs negative samples distribution.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1559947",
      "postDate": "10/27/2021 08:36:27",
      "content": "<p>Hey All,</p>\n<p>Thank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey <a href=\"https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5\" target=\"_blank\">https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5</a>.</p>\n<p>Thank you all,</p>\n<p>Regards,<br>\nChris</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hey All,\n\nThank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5.\n\nThank you all,\n\nRegards,\nChris",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1494995,
      "author_name": "yassinealouini",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/29/2021 08:07:58",
      "content": "<p>Indeed, the signal isn't always very distinct and the challenge here is to find good processing/model that will remove the noise (or at least reduce it). </p>\n<p>Check this other discussion for more details: <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/268127\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/268127</a>. </p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1495000,
          "author_name": "seshurajup",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/29/2021 08:17:35",
          "content": "<p>Thanks, I will go through it <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/yassinealouini\" target=\"_blank\">@yassinealouini</a> </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1496741,
          "author_name": "nishanthaddagatla",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/30/2021 15:44:07",
          "content": "<p>yeah i think thats true</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1498441,
      "author_name": "kevinmcisaac",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "09/01/2021 01:50:56",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/seshurajup\" target=\"_blank\">@seshurajup</a> you are spot on. The samples have significant variation in the signal to noise ratio and in many cases the GW event is buried in the noise. This is the challenge we have been given to find that GW signal when the SNR is very low.   </p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1498481,
          "author_name": "seshurajup",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "09/01/2021 02:34:55",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/kevinmcisaac\" target=\"_blank\">@kevinmcisaac</a> Thanks for the explanation. It is clear after <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/hengck23\" target=\"_blank\">@hengck23</a> shared positive vs negative samples distribution.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1559947,
      "author_name": "zerafachris",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/27/2021 08:36:27",
      "content": "<p>Hey All,</p>\n<p>Thank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey <a href=\"https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5\" target=\"_blank\">https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5</a>.</p>\n<p>Thank you all,</p>\n<p>Regards,<br>\nChris</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1494610": "**Easy (7945e449f3)**\n![(https://ibb.co/Ln7CT2c](https://i.ibb.co/WgJcrYM/easy.png)\n\n**Hard - Almost no signal (00000e74ad)**\n![https://ibb.co/4M6vbTv](https://i.ibb.co/Np8D0jD/hard.png)\n\nis it an outlier ? or is my pre-processing wrong?",
    "1494995": "Indeed, the signal isn't always very distinct and the challenge here is to find good processing/model that will remove the noise (or at least reduce it). \n\nCheck this other discussion for more details: https://www.kaggle.com/c/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/268127.",
    "1495000": "Thanks, I will go through it @yassinealouini",
    "1496741": "yeah i think thats true",
    "1498441": "seshurajup you are spot on. The samples have significant variation in the signal to noise ratio and in many cases the GW event is buried in the noise. This is the challenge we have been given to find that GW signal when the SNR is very low.",
    "1498481": "kevinmcisaac Thanks for the explanation. It is clear after @hengck23 shared positive vs negative samples distribution.",
    "1559947": "Hey All,\n\nThank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5.\n\nThank you all,\n\nRegards,\nChris"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}