{
  "id": 266230,
  "title": "Data Augmentation",
  "url": "/competitions/g2net-gravitational-wave-detection/discussion/266230",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2021-08-18T10:49:51.029743600Z",
  "votes": 16,
  "comment_count": 13,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>To reduce the risk of overfitting,i simply added two kinds of data augmentations:<br>\n1.shuffle the three files order before CQT trans;<br>\n2.add Cutout data augmentation<br>\nThese can help me improve my cv 0.8521=&gt;0.8553,and LB 0.867=&gt;0.868</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "1479213",
      "postDate": "08/18/2021 10:49:51",
      "content": "<p>To reduce the risk of overfitting,i simply added two kinds of data augmentations:<br>\n1.shuffle the three files order before CQT trans;<br>\n2.add Cutout data augmentation<br>\nThese can help me improve my cv 0.8521=&gt;0.8553,and LB 0.867=&gt;0.868</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "To reduce the risk of overfitting,i simply added two kinds of data augmentations:\n1.shuffle the three files order before CQT trans;\n2.add Cutout data augmentation\nThese can help me improve my cv 0.8521=>0.8553,and LB 0.867=>0.868",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1479253",
      "postDate": "08/18/2021 11:13:53",
      "content": "<p>Hi <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/hanson0910\" target=\"_blank\">@hanson0910</a> you always apply the first augmentation (shuffle the three files order before CQT trans), or with a probability?. Thanks</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi @hanson0910 you always apply the first augmentation (shuffle the three files order before CQT trans), or with a probability?. Thanks",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1479277",
      "postDate": "08/18/2021 11:31:22",
      "content": "<p>with p=0.5</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "with p=0.5",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1481538",
      "postDate": "08/19/2021 15:12:39",
      "content": "<p>Did you try mixup? I used mixup and it does not seem to work well due to noise in the data.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Did you try mixup? I used mixup and it does not seem to work well due to noise in the data.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1481546",
      "postDate": "08/19/2021 15:16:58",
      "content": "<p>i didn't use mixup,i think mixup may break the time information.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "i didn't use mixup,i think mixup may break the time information.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1481550",
      "postDate": "08/19/2021 15:19:59",
      "content": "<p>I used mixup augmentation on the 2D spectrogram generated by CQT trans. It's reported in the SETI competition that OR Mixup improved the model's performance.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I used mixup augmentation on the 2D spectrogram generated by CQT trans. It's reported in the SETI competition that OR Mixup improved the model's performance.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1481567",
      "postDate": "08/19/2021 15:26:00",
      "content": "<p>thanks for your share,i will try it.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "thanks for your share,i will try it.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1485144",
      "postDate": "08/21/2021 20:41:07",
      "content": "<p>Do you mean you shuffle signals from three detectors before stacking? It's one file, not three files.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Do you mean you shuffle signals from three detectors before stacking? It's one file, not three files.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1486472",
      "postDate": "08/23/2021 02:22:08",
      "content": "<p>you could understand one file with 3 channels</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "you could understand one file with 3 channels",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1486816",
      "postDate": "08/23/2021 08:28:34",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/solosquad1999\" target=\"_blank\">@solosquad1999</a> I also tried mixup and didn't get any significant improvement, did it work for you later ?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "solosquad1999 I also tried mixup and didn't get any significant improvement, did it work for you later ?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1486894",
      "postDate": "08/23/2021 09:32:10",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/zarif98sjs\" target=\"_blank\">@zarif98sjs</a> : Neither does my model.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "zarif98sjs : Neither does my model.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1486978",
      "postDate": "08/23/2021 10:25:21",
      "content": "<p>The same for me :( Mixup does not work.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "The same for me :( Mixup does not work.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1487287",
      "postDate": "08/23/2021 14:23:26",
      "content": "<p>I wonder why it worked so good for the SETI competition : ( (I didn't give that, so don't know much about the data)</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I wonder why it worked so good for the SETI competition : ( (I didn't give that, so don't know much about the data)",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "1561184",
      "postDate": "10/27/2021 12:15:21",
      "content": "<p>Hey All,</p>\n<p>Thank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey <a href=\"https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5\" target=\"_blank\">https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5</a>.</p>\n<p>Thank you all,</p>\n<p>Regards,<br>\nChris</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hey All,\n\nThank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5.\n\nThank you all,\n\nRegards,\nChris",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 1479253,
      "author_name": "lhkhiem28",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/18/2021 11:13:53",
      "content": "<p>Hi <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/hanson0910\" target=\"_blank\">@hanson0910</a> you always apply the first augmentation (shuffle the three files order before CQT trans), or with a probability?. Thanks</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1479277,
          "author_name": "hanson0910",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/18/2021 11:31:22",
          "content": "<p>with p=0.5</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1481538,
      "author_name": "solosquad1999",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/19/2021 15:12:39",
      "content": "<p>Did you try mixup? I used mixup and it does not seem to work well due to noise in the data.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1481546,
          "author_name": "hanson0910",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/19/2021 15:16:58",
          "content": "<p>i didn't use mixup,i think mixup may break the time information.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1481550,
          "author_name": "solosquad1999",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/19/2021 15:19:59",
          "content": "<p>I used mixup augmentation on the 2D spectrogram generated by CQT trans. It's reported in the SETI competition that OR Mixup improved the model's performance.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1481567,
          "author_name": "hanson0910",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/19/2021 15:26:00",
          "content": "<p>thanks for your share,i will try it.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1486816,
          "author_name": "zarif98sjs",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/23/2021 08:28:34",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/solosquad1999\" target=\"_blank\">@solosquad1999</a> I also tried mixup and didn't get any significant improvement, did it work for you later ?</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1486894,
          "author_name": "solosquad1999",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/23/2021 09:32:10",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/zarif98sjs\" target=\"_blank\">@zarif98sjs</a> : Neither does my model.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1486978,
          "author_name": "analokamus",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/23/2021 10:25:21",
          "content": "<p>The same for me :( Mixup does not work.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        },
        {
          "id": 1487287,
          "author_name": "zarif98sjs",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/23/2021 14:23:26",
          "content": "<p>I wonder why it worked so good for the SETI competition : ( (I didn't give that, so don't know much about the data)</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1485144,
      "author_name": "atamazian",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/21/2021 20:41:07",
      "content": "<p>Do you mean you shuffle signals from three detectors before stacking? It's one file, not three files.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 1486472,
          "author_name": "hanson0910",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/23/2021 02:22:08",
          "content": "<p>you could understand one file with 3 channels</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 1561184,
      "author_name": "zerafachris",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/27/2021 12:15:21",
      "content": "<p>Hey All,</p>\n<p>Thank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey <a href=\"https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5\" target=\"_blank\">https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5</a>.</p>\n<p>Thank you all,</p>\n<p>Regards,<br>\nChris</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1479213": "To reduce the risk of overfitting,i simply added two kinds of data augmentations:\n1.shuffle the three files order before CQT trans;\n2.add Cutout data augmentation\nThese can help me improve my cv 0.8521=>0.8553,and LB 0.867=>0.868",
    "1479253": "Hi @hanson0910 you always apply the first augmentation (shuffle the three files order before CQT trans), or with a probability?. Thanks",
    "1479277": "with p=0.5",
    "1481538": "Did you try mixup? I used mixup and it does not seem to work well due to noise in the data.",
    "1481546": "i didn't use mixup,i think mixup may break the time information.",
    "1481550": "I used mixup augmentation on the 2D spectrogram generated by CQT trans. It's reported in the SETI competition that OR Mixup improved the model's performance.",
    "1481567": "thanks for your share,i will try it.",
    "1485144": "Do you mean you shuffle signals from three detectors before stacking? It's one file, not three files.",
    "1486472": "you could understand one file with 3 channels",
    "1486816": "solosquad1999 I also tried mixup and didn't get any significant improvement, did it work for you later ?",
    "1486894": "zarif98sjs : Neither does my model.",
    "1486978": "The same for me :( Mixup does not work.",
    "1487287": "I wonder why it worked so good for the SETI competition : ( (I didn't give that, so don't know much about the data)",
    "1561184": "Hey All,\n\nThank you all for taking part in our competition. The participation has been overwhelmingly positive. We are currently conducting a survey to gauge the demographic and outreach achieved. Kindly spare 2min and fill in this survey https://forms.gle/QP9L16niPexozyhu5.\n\nThank you all,\n\nRegards,\nChris"
  },
  "source": "meta"
}