{
  "id": 325157,
  "title": "About the \"Shady Submission\"",
  "url": "/competitions/fungiclef2022/discussion/325157",
  "author_name": "picekl",
  "post_date": "2022-05-15T06:42:29.640000",
  "votes": 2,
  "comment_count": 0,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Dear Participants,</p>\n<p>Following the cheat submission by one of the participants. I would like to state a few things:</p>\n<ol>\n<li><p>This is a Community Prediction Competition with no Kaggle points or leaderboard prices. There is basically no reason to cheat.</p></li>\n<li><p>Anyone who does not provide a Working Notes paper and code on GitHub to produce the results will be removed from the Leaderboard.</p></li>\n<li><p>We explicitly tell you in the description that the data come from Danish Fungal Atlas. If you run to crawl the labels you are just a scumbag that should be immediately removed from the community.</p></li>\n<li><p>Using any additional data is strictly forbidden by the challenge rules.</p></li>\n</ol>\n<p>Fragment of the Official Rules available under <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/fungiclef2022/rules\" target=\"_blank\">Rules Section</a>.</p>\n<h2>Official ranking of LifeCLEF - FungiCLEF 2022</h2>\n<p>In order to be part of the official ranking of FungiCLEF 2022 lab which will be published and used in scientific communication, the teams are required to submit a working note paper to LifeCLEF workshop describing the methods implemented which will be peer reviewed.<br>\nThis working note must provide sufficient details to allow to reproduce all final submissions.<br>\nAny run that could not be reproduced thanks to its description in the working notes might be removed from the official publication of the results.<br>\nWorking notes are published within CEUR-WS proceedings, resulting in an assignment of an individual DOI (URN) and an indexing by many bibliography systems including DBLP.<br>\nAccording to the CEUR-WS policies, a single-blind, two stage review of the working notes will be conducted by LifeCLEF organizing committee and external reviewers to ensure quality. As an illustration, LifeCLEF 2021 working notes (task overviews and participant working notes) can be found within <a href=\"http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2936/\" target=\"_blank\">CLEF 2021 CEUR-WS proceedings</a>.</p>\n<p>Below the link gives more information about the templates (latex, doc) to use, the mandatory information to report (about the names, affiliations, etc):</p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://clef2022.clef-initiative.eu/index.php?page=Pages/instructions_for_authors.html\" target=\"_blank\">CLEF instructions for authors</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://easychair.org/my/conference?conf=clef2022\" target=\"_blank\">The direct link to submit your working note through easychair</a></li>\n</ul>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": 1790636,
      "postDate": "2022-05-15T06:42:29.640Z",
      "content": "<p>Dear Participants,</p>\n<p>Following the cheat submission by one of the participants. I would like to state a few things:</p>\n<ol>\n<li><p>This is a Community Prediction Competition with no Kaggle points or leaderboard prices. There is basically no reason to cheat.</p></li>\n<li><p>Anyone who does not provide a Working Notes paper and code on GitHub to produce the results will be removed from the Leaderboard.</p></li>\n<li><p>We explicitly tell you in the description that the data come from Danish Fungal Atlas. If you run to crawl the labels you are just a scumbag that should be immediately removed from the community.</p></li>\n<li><p>Using any additional data is strictly forbidden by the challenge rules.</p></li>\n</ol>\n<p>Fragment of the Official Rules available under <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/fungiclef2022/rules\" target=\"_blank\">Rules Section</a>.</p>\n<h2>Official ranking of LifeCLEF - FungiCLEF 2022</h2>\n<p>In order to be part of the official ranking of FungiCLEF 2022 lab which will be published and used in scientific communication, the teams are required to submit a working note paper to LifeCLEF workshop describing the methods implemented which will be peer reviewed.<br>\nThis working note must provide sufficient details to allow to reproduce all final submissions.<br>\nAny run that could not be reproduced thanks to its description in the working notes might be removed from the official publication of the results.<br>\nWorking notes are published within CEUR-WS proceedings, resulting in an assignment of an individual DOI (URN) and an indexing by many bibliography systems including DBLP.<br>\nAccording to the CEUR-WS policies, a single-blind, two stage review of the working notes will be conducted by LifeCLEF organizing committee and external reviewers to ensure quality. As an illustration, LifeCLEF 2021 working notes (task overviews and participant working notes) can be found within <a href=\"http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2936/\" target=\"_blank\">CLEF 2021 CEUR-WS proceedings</a>.</p>\n<p>Below the link gives more information about the templates (latex, doc) to use, the mandatory information to report (about the names, affiliations, etc):</p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://clef2022.clef-initiative.eu/index.php?page=Pages/instructions_for_authors.html\" target=\"_blank\">CLEF instructions for authors</a></li>\n<li><a href=\"https://easychair.org/my/conference?conf=clef2022\" target=\"_blank\">The direct link to submit your working note through easychair</a></li>\n</ul>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Dear Participants,\n\nFollowing the cheat submission by one of the participants. I would like to state a few things:\n\n1. This is a Community Prediction Competition with no Kaggle points or leaderboard prices. There is basically no reason to cheat.\n\n2. Anyone who does not provide a Working Notes paper and code on GitHub to produce the results will be removed from the Leaderboard.\n\n3. We explicitly tell you in the description that the data come from Danish Fungal Atlas. If you run to crawl the labels you are just a scumbag that should be immediately removed from the community.\n\n4. Using any additional data is strictly forbidden by the challenge rules.\n\nFragment of the Official Rules available under [Rules Section](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/fungiclef2022/rules).\n\n## Official ranking of LifeCLEF - FungiCLEF 2022\nIn order to be part of the official ranking of FungiCLEF 2022 lab which will be published and used in scientific communication, the teams are required to submit a working note paper to LifeCLEF workshop describing the methods implemented which will be peer reviewed.\nThis working note must provide sufficient details to allow to reproduce all final submissions.\nAny run that could not be reproduced thanks to its description in the working notes might be removed from the official publication of the results.\nWorking notes are published within CEUR-WS proceedings, resulting in an assignment of an individual DOI (URN) and an indexing by many bibliography systems including DBLP.\nAccording to the CEUR-WS policies, a single-blind, two stage review of the working notes will be conducted by LifeCLEF organizing committee and external reviewers to ensure quality. As an illustration, LifeCLEF 2021 working notes (task overviews and participant working notes) can be found within [CLEF 2021 CEUR-WS proceedings] (http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2936/).\n\nBelow the link gives more information about the templates (latex, doc) to use, the mandatory information to report (about the names, affiliations, etc):\n\n- [CLEF instructions for authors](https://clef2022.clef-initiative.eu/index.php?page=Pages/instructions_for_authors.html)\n- [The direct link to submit your working note through easychair](https://easychair.org/my/conference?conf=clef2022)\n\n",
      "votes": 2
    }
  ],
  "comments": [],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "1790636": "Dear Participants,\n\nFollowing the cheat submission by one of the participants. I would like to state a few things:\n\n1. This is a Community Prediction Competition with no Kaggle points or leaderboard prices. There is basically no reason to cheat.\n\n2. Anyone who does not provide a Working Notes paper and code on GitHub to produce the results will be removed from the Leaderboard.\n\n3. We explicitly tell you in the description that the data come from Danish Fungal Atlas. If you run to crawl the labels you are just a scumbag that should be immediately removed from the community.\n\n4. Using any additional data is strictly forbidden by the challenge rules.\n\nFragment of the Official Rules available under [Rules Section](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/fungiclef2022/rules).\n\n## Official ranking of LifeCLEF - FungiCLEF 2022\nIn order to be part of the official ranking of FungiCLEF 2022 lab which will be published and used in scientific communication, the teams are required to submit a working note paper to LifeCLEF workshop describing the methods implemented which will be peer reviewed.\nThis working note must provide sufficient details to allow to reproduce all final submissions.\nAny run that could not be reproduced thanks to its description in the working notes might be removed from the official publication of the results.\nWorking notes are published within CEUR-WS proceedings, resulting in an assignment of an individual DOI (URN) and an indexing by many bibliography systems including DBLP.\nAccording to the CEUR-WS policies, a single-blind, two stage review of the working notes will be conducted by LifeCLEF organizing committee and external reviewers to ensure quality. As an illustration, LifeCLEF 2021 working notes (task overviews and participant working notes) can be found within [CLEF 2021 CEUR-WS proceedings] (http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2936/).\n\nBelow the link gives more information about the templates (latex, doc) to use, the mandatory information to report (about the names, affiliations, etc):\n\n- [CLEF instructions for authors](https://clef2022.clef-initiative.eu/index.php?page=Pages/instructions_for_authors.html)\n- [The direct link to submit your working note through easychair](https://easychair.org/my/conference?conf=clef2022)\n\n"
  }
}