{
  "id": 5319,
  "title": "Leaderboard Benchmark Questions",
  "url": "/competitions/flight2-milestone/discussion/5319",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2013-08-06T16:42:51.290Z",
  "votes": null,
  "comment_count": 1,
  "views": 1818,
  "content": "<p>The behavior of the leaderboard benchmarks has me puzzled. &nbsp;Can anyone help me understand the following?</p>\n<p>Benchmark #2 (the best on the leaderboard) is described as:</p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>2- all flights fly at 17,500 ft at 500 mph to destination</em></p>\n<p>The next best benchmark is #3, which is described as:</p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>3- all flights fly at 17,500 ft at 1000 mph to destination</em></p>\n<p>Benchmark #2 and #3 get <em>exactly</em> the same score, even though the second plane is flying 1000 mph. How is that possible? &nbsp;(I could understand it being more or even less, but why exactly equal?)</p>\n<p>Next, the 1000 mph velocity in benchmark #3 is supersonic, and I don't think most commercial airliners are designed for that. &nbsp;Nevertheless, is that a valid speed for a submission?&nbsp;</p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.4\">In addition, there are some benchmarks (e.g. #5) where the flight's velocity is 0 mph:</span></p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>5- all flights fly at 17,500 ft at 0 mph to destination</em></p>\n<p>Is a 0 mph velocity permitted? (and what does that really mean?) &nbsp;I'm also puzzled why a 0 mph plane scores better than benchmark #8, where the plane is moving 500 mph:</p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>8- all flights fly at 31,000 ft at 500 mph to destination</em></p>\n<p>Any comments, anyone? &nbsp;</p>\n<p>PS I wasn't in Flight-Quest #1, so perhaps I'm missing something fundamental...</p>\n<p>&nbsp;</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "28301",
      "postDate": "08/06/2013 16:42:51",
      "content": "<p>The behavior of the leaderboard benchmarks has me puzzled. &nbsp;Can anyone help me understand the following?</p>\n<p>Benchmark #2 (the best on the leaderboard) is described as:</p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>2- all flights fly at 17,500 ft at 500 mph to destination</em></p>\n<p>The next best benchmark is #3, which is described as:</p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>3- all flights fly at 17,500 ft at 1000 mph to destination</em></p>\n<p>Benchmark #2 and #3 get <em>exactly</em> the same score, even though the second plane is flying 1000 mph. How is that possible? &nbsp;(I could understand it being more or even less, but why exactly equal?)</p>\n<p>Next, the 1000 mph velocity in benchmark #3 is supersonic, and I don't think most commercial airliners are designed for that. &nbsp;Nevertheless, is that a valid speed for a submission?&nbsp;</p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: 1.4\">In addition, there are some benchmarks (e.g. #5) where the flight's velocity is 0 mph:</span></p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>5- all flights fly at 17,500 ft at 0 mph to destination</em></p>\n<p>Is a 0 mph velocity permitted? (and what does that really mean?) &nbsp;I'm also puzzled why a 0 mph plane scores better than benchmark #8, where the plane is moving 500 mph:</p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>8- all flights fly at 31,000 ft at 500 mph to destination</em></p>\n<p>Any comments, anyone? &nbsp;</p>\n<p>PS I wasn't in Flight-Quest #1, so perhaps I'm missing something fundamental...</p>\n<p>&nbsp;</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "28302",
      "postDate": "08/06/2013 16:48:34",
      "content": "<p>Those were the results of very old tests that shouldn't have been showing up - don't draw any meaning from them. They have been removed now, apologies for the confusion.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 28302,
      "author_name": "benhamner",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/06/2013 16:48:34",
      "content": "<p>Those were the results of very old tests that shouldn't have been showing up - don't draw any meaning from them. They have been removed now, apologies for the confusion.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "28301": "",
    "28302": ""
  },
  "source": "meta"
}