{
  "id": 447271,
  "title": "Solution and submission values for time_stamp do not match",
  "url": "/competitions/earthquake-prediction/discussion/447271",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2023-10-15T05:59:43.654909300Z",
  "votes": 1,
  "comment_count": 4,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>I keep encountering an issue while submitting my results, and the error message states \"The 'time_stamp' values in my solution and submission do not match.\" How can I address this problem?</p>\n<p>I have conducted tests using various time periods, such as the range from 2814.282717 to 2949.590001 or from 2814.286073 to 2949.593357. These submissions all failed. Despite attempting different decimal precision levels and even copying 'time_stamp' values directly from the test data, none of these approaches have proven successful.</p>\n<p>The attachment is an example I have tried (please note that all elements except time_stamp values are set as 0). The first 30 rows match those in the 'example_submission.csv' file.</p>\n<p>Is there any idea to address this issue? Would it be possible for the organizer to share a new example containing all time stamps?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "2482559",
      "postDate": "10/15/2023 05:59:43",
      "content": "<p>I keep encountering an issue while submitting my results, and the error message states \"The 'time_stamp' values in my solution and submission do not match.\" How can I address this problem?</p>\n<p>I have conducted tests using various time periods, such as the range from 2814.282717 to 2949.590001 or from 2814.286073 to 2949.593357. These submissions all failed. Despite attempting different decimal precision levels and even copying 'time_stamp' values directly from the test data, none of these approaches have proven successful.</p>\n<p>The attachment is an example I have tried (please note that all elements except time_stamp values are set as 0). The first 30 rows match those in the 'example_submission.csv' file.</p>\n<p>Is there any idea to address this issue? Would it be possible for the organizer to share a new example containing all time stamps?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "I keep encountering an issue while submitting my results, and the error message states \"The 'time_stamp' values in my solution and submission do not match.\" How can I address this problem?\n\nI have conducted tests using various time periods, such as the range from 2814.282717 to 2949.590001 or from 2814.286073 to 2949.593357. These submissions all failed. Despite attempting different decimal precision levels and even copying 'time_stamp' values directly from the test data, none of these approaches have proven successful.\n\nThe attachment is an example I have tried (please note that all elements except time_stamp values are set as 0). The first 30 rows match those in the 'example_submission.csv' file.\n\nIs there any idea to address this issue? Would it be possible for the organizer to share a new example containing all time stamps?",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2484500",
      "postDate": "10/16/2023 14:26:48",
      "content": "<p>Hello, the issue is fixed by providing an index column to avoid the precision issue in the timestamp field. Full length sample submission is also provided. Thank you for bringing in the issue!</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hello, the issue is fixed by providing an index column to avoid the precision issue in the timestamp field. Full length sample submission is also provided. Thank you for bringing in the issue!",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2484987",
      "postDate": "10/16/2023 20:16:23",
      "content": "<blockquote>\n  <p>Submission must have 161274 rows<br>\n  but test_data with 161278</p>\n</blockquote>",
      "rawMarkdown": ">Submission must have 161274 rows\nbut test_data with 161278",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2485141",
      "postDate": "10/17/2023 01:00:58",
      "content": "<p>Thanks. it works.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Thanks. it works.",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "2487393",
      "postDate": "10/18/2023 14:59:59",
      "content": "<p>Yeah, that is correct. The reason is you need to use the past window of length 5 so you won't be able to provide predictions for the first 4 rows in the test_data.  </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Yeah, that is correct. The reason is you need to use the past window of length 5 so you won't be able to provide predictions for the first 4 rows in the test_data.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 2484500,
      "author_name": "fatihacunbu",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/16/2023 14:26:48",
      "content": "<p>Hello, the issue is fixed by providing an index column to avoid the precision issue in the timestamp field. Full length sample submission is also provided. Thank you for bringing in the issue!</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2485141,
          "author_name": "fuqiangliu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "10/17/2023 01:00:58",
          "content": "<p>Thanks. it works.</p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": 2484987,
      "author_name": "tywangty",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "10/16/2023 20:16:23",
      "content": "<blockquote>\n  <p>Submission must have 161274 rows<br>\n  but test_data with 161278</p>\n</blockquote>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 2487393,
          "author_name": "fatihacunbu",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "10/18/2023 14:59:59",
          "content": "<p>Yeah, that is correct. The reason is you need to use the past window of length 5 so you won't be able to provide predictions for the first 4 rows in the test_data.  </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "2482559": "I keep encountering an issue while submitting my results, and the error message states \"The 'time_stamp' values in my solution and submission do not match.\" How can I address this problem?\n\nI have conducted tests using various time periods, such as the range from 2814.282717 to 2949.590001 or from 2814.286073 to 2949.593357. These submissions all failed. Despite attempting different decimal precision levels and even copying 'time_stamp' values directly from the test data, none of these approaches have proven successful.\n\nThe attachment is an example I have tried (please note that all elements except time_stamp values are set as 0). The first 30 rows match those in the 'example_submission.csv' file.\n\nIs there any idea to address this issue? Would it be possible for the organizer to share a new example containing all time stamps?",
    "2484500": "Hello, the issue is fixed by providing an index column to avoid the precision issue in the timestamp field. Full length sample submission is also provided. Thank you for bringing in the issue!",
    "2484987": ">Submission must have 161274 rows\nbut test_data with 161278",
    "2485141": "Thanks. it works.",
    "2487393": "Yeah, that is correct. The reason is you need to use the past window of length 5 so you won't be able to provide predictions for the first 4 rows in the test_data."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}