{
  "id": 599017,
  "title": "Congratulations to the Winners!",
  "url": "/competitions/drw-crypto-market-prediction/discussion/599017",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2025-08-13T18:41:08.381778500Z",
  "votes": null,
  "comment_count": 2,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>Hi Kagglers,</p>\n<p>Thank you for your participation and effort in our competition! We’ve completed the code review and cleaned the leaderboard by removing submissions that violated the rules—congratulations to our winners! We will reach out to you individually soon.</p>\n<p>If you enjoyed tackling this type of challenge, we encourage you to explore <a href=\"https://www.drw.com/work-at-drw\" target=\"_blank\">current opportunities at DRW</a>. We are actively hiring a range quantitative roles across our <a href=\"https://www.drw.com/contact-us\" target=\"_blank\">global offices</a>.</p>\n<p>We look forward to your model write-ups and applications, and hope to see you in future Kaggle challenges!</p>\n<p>Cheers,<br>\nThe DRW &amp; Cumberland Team</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "3269002",
      "postDate": "08/13/2025 18:41:08",
      "content": "<p>Hi Kagglers,</p>\n<p>Thank you for your participation and effort in our competition! We’ve completed the code review and cleaned the leaderboard by removing submissions that violated the rules—congratulations to our winners! We will reach out to you individually soon.</p>\n<p>If you enjoyed tackling this type of challenge, we encourage you to explore <a href=\"https://www.drw.com/work-at-drw\" target=\"_blank\">current opportunities at DRW</a>. We are actively hiring a range quantitative roles across our <a href=\"https://www.drw.com/contact-us\" target=\"_blank\">global offices</a>.</p>\n<p>We look forward to your model write-ups and applications, and hope to see you in future Kaggle challenges!</p>\n<p>Cheers,<br>\nThe DRW &amp; Cumberland Team</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi Kagglers,\n\nThank you for your participation and effort in our competition! We’ve completed the code review and cleaned the leaderboard by removing submissions that violated the rules—congratulations to our winners! We will reach out to you individually soon.\n\nIf you enjoyed tackling this type of challenge, we encourage you to explore [current opportunities at DRW](https://www.drw.com/work-at-drw). We are actively hiring a range quantitative roles across our [global offices](https://www.drw.com/contact-us).\n\nWe look forward to your model write-ups and applications, and hope to see you in future Kaggle challenges!\n\nCheers,\nThe DRW & Cumberland Team",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "3269175",
      "postDate": "08/14/2025 03:36:37",
      "content": "<p>Hi, which rule did I violate?</p>\n<p>It's super unprofessional that you didn't notify or ask anything about disqualification, because code is completely clean and fair.</p>\n<p>As I said here <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drw-crypto-market-prediction/discussion/598440#3268572\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drw-crypto-market-prediction/discussion/598440#3268572</a>, I can provide code with exactly same results, but I've sent simplified approach for easier code review that is insignificantly better. You could ask me if it was a problem, and I would send you original one, but you just ignored my messages as well as my mentions here :(</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "Hi, which rule did I violate?\n\nIt's super unprofessional that you didn't notify or ask anything about disqualification, because code is completely clean and fair.\n\nAs I said here https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drw-crypto-market-prediction/discussion/598440#3268572, I can provide code with exactly same results, but I've sent simplified approach for easier code review that is insignificantly better. You could ask me if it was a problem, and I would send you original one, but you just ignored my messages as well as my mentions here :(",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "3271533",
      "postDate": "08/19/2025 05:18:23",
      "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/addisonhoward\" target=\"_blank\">@addisonhoward</a> Hi, I know that since this is a community competition you are not going to intermediate anything, so I don't ask this. But DRW mentioned that they will make another competitions in future, so I just want to highlight this case as another example that they are not reliable as organizers and I don't think they should be allowed to make another competitions without kaggle's guidance. </p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "addisonhoward Hi, I know that since this is a community competition you are not going to intermediate anything, so I don't ask this. But DRW mentioned that they will make another competitions in future, so I just want to highlight this case as another example that they are not reliable as organizers and I don't think they should be allowed to make another competitions without kaggle's guidance.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 3269175,
      "author_name": "gleb270",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "08/14/2025 03:36:37",
      "content": "<p>Hi, which rule did I violate?</p>\n<p>It's super unprofessional that you didn't notify or ask anything about disqualification, because code is completely clean and fair.</p>\n<p>As I said here <a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drw-crypto-market-prediction/discussion/598440#3268572\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drw-crypto-market-prediction/discussion/598440#3268572</a>, I can provide code with exactly same results, but I've sent simplified approach for easier code review that is insignificantly better. You could ask me if it was a problem, and I would send you original one, but you just ignored my messages as well as my mentions here :(</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": [
        {
          "id": 3271533,
          "author_name": "gleb270",
          "author_url": "",
          "post_date": "08/19/2025 05:18:23",
          "content": "<p><a href=\"https://www.kaggle.com/addisonhoward\" target=\"_blank\">@addisonhoward</a> Hi, I know that since this is a community competition you are not going to intermediate anything, so I don't ask this. But DRW mentioned that they will make another competitions in future, so I just want to highlight this case as another example that they are not reliable as organizers and I don't think they should be allowed to make another competitions without kaggle's guidance. </p>",
          "votes": null,
          "replies": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "3269002": "Hi Kagglers,\n\nThank you for your participation and effort in our competition! We’ve completed the code review and cleaned the leaderboard by removing submissions that violated the rules—congratulations to our winners! We will reach out to you individually soon.\n\nIf you enjoyed tackling this type of challenge, we encourage you to explore [current opportunities at DRW](https://www.drw.com/work-at-drw). We are actively hiring a range quantitative roles across our [global offices](https://www.drw.com/contact-us).\n\nWe look forward to your model write-ups and applications, and hope to see you in future Kaggle challenges!\n\nCheers,\nThe DRW & Cumberland Team",
    "3269175": "Hi, which rule did I violate?\n\nIt's super unprofessional that you didn't notify or ask anything about disqualification, because code is completely clean and fair.\n\nAs I said here https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/drw-crypto-market-prediction/discussion/598440#3268572, I can provide code with exactly same results, but I've sent simplified approach for easier code review that is insignificantly better. You could ask me if it was a problem, and I would send you original one, but you just ignored my messages as well as my mentions here :(",
    "3271533": "addisonhoward Hi, I know that since this is a community competition you are not going to intermediate anything, so I don't ask this. But DRW mentioned that they will make another competitions in future, so I just want to highlight this case as another example that they are not reliable as organizers and I don't think they should be allowed to make another competitions without kaggle's guidance."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}