{
  "id": 545570,
  "title": "all questions on using PolNet-simulated data (portal dataset ID: 10441)",
  "url": "/competitions/czii-cryo-et-object-identification/discussion/545570",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2024-11-11T01:34:25.225206900Z",
  "votes": 2,
  "comment_count": 1,
  "views": 0,
  "content": "<p>i thought it would be straight forward to use them, … but </p>\n<ol>\n<li>Do we need to denoise ourselves?</li>\n</ol>\n<pre><code>zarr_file \\\n    'download.zarr'\n</code></pre>\n<p>tomogram_metadata.json</p>\n<pre><code>     \n     \n     \n     \n     \n</code></pre>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "3041901",
      "postDate": "11/11/2024 01:34:25",
      "content": "<p>i thought it would be straight forward to use them, … but </p>\n<ol>\n<li>Do we need to denoise ourselves?</li>\n</ol>\n<pre><code>zarr_file \\\n    'download.zarr'\n</code></pre>\n<p>tomogram_metadata.json</p>\n<pre><code>     \n     \n     \n     \n     \n</code></pre>",
      "rawMarkdown": "i thought it would be straight forward to use them, ... but \n\n1. Do we need to denoise ourselves?\n```\nzarr_file =\\\n    '<download>/10441/TS_0/Reconstructions/VoxelSpacing10.000/Tomograms/100/TS_0.zarr'\n```\ntomogram_metadata.json\n\n```\n    \"processing\": \"raw\",\n    \"reconstruction_method\": \"WBP\",\n    \"reconstruction_software\": \"IMOD\",\n    \"tomogram_version\": 1,\n    \"voxel_spacing\": 10.0,\n```",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "3041921",
      "postDate": "11/11/2024 02:20:34",
      "content": "<p>We have been using the tomograms from PolNet without doing additional denoising. There can be some difference in the data distribution, but in practice it works pretty well. Since the PolNet tomograms are synthetic they are already different from the weighted back projection versions of the experimental tomograms.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "We have been using the tomograms from PolNet without doing additional denoising. There can be some difference in the data distribution, but in practice it works pretty well. Since the PolNet tomograms are synthetic they are already different from the weighted back projection versions of the experimental tomograms.",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 3041921,
      "author_name": "kharrington",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "11/11/2024 02:20:34",
      "content": "<p>We have been using the tomograms from PolNet without doing additional denoising. There can be some difference in the data distribution, but in practice it works pretty well. Since the PolNet tomograms are synthetic they are already different from the weighted back projection versions of the experimental tomograms.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "3041901": "i thought it would be straight forward to use them, ... but \n\n1. Do we need to denoise ourselves?\n```\nzarr_file =\\\n    '<download>/10441/TS_0/Reconstructions/VoxelSpacing10.000/Tomograms/100/TS_0.zarr'\n```\ntomogram_metadata.json\n\n```\n    \"processing\": \"raw\",\n    \"reconstruction_method\": \"WBP\",\n    \"reconstruction_software\": \"IMOD\",\n    \"tomogram_version\": 1,\n    \"voxel_spacing\": 10.0,\n```",
    "3041921": "We have been using the tomograms from PolNet without doing additional denoising. There can be some difference in the data distribution, but in practice it works pretty well. Since the PolNet tomograms are synthetic they are already different from the weighted back projection versions of the experimental tomograms."
  },
  "source": "meta"
}