These copy and pasted notebooks are available, which are plagiarism of my notebooks I published.
\nThis even wrote in the title that it is a copy of mine.
\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-kaerururu-s-infer-addtest
\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f1
\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/lunapandachan/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f2
I spent a lot of ideas (some borrowed from past competitions) and time creating my original notebooks (train fold0, inference).
\nIt's sad that these copy and pasted notebooks earn a lot of upvotes with less effort.
\nAlso, The more notebooks which have no new ideas , the harder it is to find notebooks which have new ideas.
\nWe should not make kaggle a place where people who cheat like this can get benefit.
\nNo one will share their knowledge, if such people increase and these cheating are allowed.
\nIf you agree, please report them.
", "messages": [ { "id": 1767655, "postDate": "2022-04-25T14:27:55.820Z", "content": "These copy and pasted notebooks are available, which are plagiarism of my notebooks I published.
\nThis even wrote in the title that it is a copy of mine.
\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-kaerururu-s-infer-addtest
\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f1
\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/lunapandachan/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f2
I spent a lot of ideas (some borrowed from past competitions) and time creating my original notebooks (train fold0, inference).
\nIt's sad that these copy and pasted notebooks earn a lot of upvotes with less effort.
\nAlso, The more notebooks which have no new ideas , the harder it is to find notebooks which have new ideas.
\nWe should not make kaggle a place where people who cheat like this can get benefit.
\nNo one will share their knowledge, if such people increase and these cheating are allowed.
\nIf you agree, please report them.
", "rawMarkdown": "These copy and pasted notebooks are available, which are plagiarism of my notebooks I published.\n\n[This](https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-kaerururu-s-infer-addtest) even wrote in the title that it is a copy of mine.\n\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-kaerururu-s-infer-addtest\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f1\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/lunapandachan/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f2\n\n\nI spent a lot of ideas (some borrowed from past competitions) and time creating my original notebooks ([train fold0](https://www.kaggle.com/code/kaerunantoka/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f0), [inference](https://www.kaggle.com/code/kaerunantoka/birdclef2022-ex005-f0-infer)).\n\nIt's sad that these copy and pasted notebooks earn a lot of upvotes with less effort.\n\nAlso, The more notebooks which have no new ideas , the harder it is to find notebooks which have new ideas.\n\nWe should not make kaggle a place where people who cheat like this can get benefit.\n\nNo one will share their knowledge, if such people increase and these cheating are allowed.\n\nIf you agree, please report them.", "votes": 170 }, { "id": 1767991, "postDate": "2022-04-25T21:12:43.573Z", "content": "Thank you for sharing your opinion, I was thinking the same thing.
\nIn addition, I think those notebooks are unuseful in that they are written in Japanese, and also nonsense in that they are using Japanese inside joke = Yukkuri Jikkyou; contents frequently used in Japanese Youtube channel.
\nFor sure, Notebooks and Discussion written in our mother's tongue is easy to read, but they may interrupt the role of
\ninformation exchange. (So I'm writing discussion in my poor English like this comment.)
I think Notebook downvote should be introduced.
", "rawMarkdown": "Thank you for sharing your opinion, I was thinking the same thing.\n\nIn addition, I think those notebooks are unuseful in that they are written in Japanese, and also nonsense in that they are using Japanese inside joke = Yukkuri Jikkyou; contents frequently used in Japanese Youtube channel.\n\nFor sure, Notebooks and Discussion written in our mother's tongue is easy to read, but they may interrupt the role of \ninformation exchange. (So I'm writing discussion in my poor English like this comment.)\n\nI think Notebook downvote should be introduced.", "votes": 15 }, { "id": 1768982, "postDate": "2022-04-26T20:21:02.720Z", "content": "i agree with you..it's a fact
", "rawMarkdown": "i agree with you..it's a fact", "votes": 8 }, { "id": 1769423, "postDate": "2022-04-27T08:51:51.007Z", "content": "Apologize to every participant.
\nI deleted my last post, since I realized how rude I was and what a wrong mindset I had.
I would like to apologize to the original contributor as soon as possible.
\nkaerunantoka -san
\nFirst of all, let me apologize to you sincerely.
\nI changed my own mindset after I looked at my post again, and receive advices from my friends who watches the discussion.
First, it was absolutely wrong that I disregarded your will.
\nWhen discussing about reuse of someone's contribution, we must firstly consider well about the will of the person who originally contributed the community .
\nSecond, I rudely mention about your kindly-provided codes.
\nLast, I was too careless about your huge efforts, that you managed to get time from your real and private life.
Above all, my biggest misunderstanding was that I forgot thankfulness for the voluntary contributions from the great participants.
\nI'm shame for myself, sorry.
\n(I'm sorry that I formerly wrote this part in Non-English)
It is not the matter what I thought.
\nThe matter is that the notebook broke Community Guidelines.
In addition, we have better use English in English community…
\n(No need to write Japanese together…)
I'm glad to know someone took the initiative to delete the plagiarism notebook. upvote for you two
", "rawMarkdown": "I'm glad to know someone took the initiative to delete the plagiarism notebook. upvote for you two", "votes": 6 }, { "id": 1769473, "postDate": "2022-04-27T09:43:54.083Z", "content": "@kaerunantoka
\nI regret for lack of my understandings. I shall study Community Guidelines so that I can follow it myself.
I understand writing in Japanese is a wrong manner, too. Again I realized I had better learn from others' behaviors more carefully. I'll repair the post above into English later.
\nMany thanks, for both your contribution and your reply. And sorry again from the bottom of my heart.
", "rawMarkdown": "@kaerunantoka \nI regret for lack of my understandings. I shall study Community Guidelines so that I can follow it myself.\n\nI understand writing in Japanese is a wrong manner, too. Again I realized I had better learn from others' behaviors more carefully. I'll repair the post above into English later.\n\nMany thanks, for both your contribution and your reply. And sorry again from the bottom of my heart.", "votes": 6 }, { "id": 1769500, "postDate": "2022-04-27T10:21:30.427Z", "content": "Good step a copied notebook is deleted and also acknowledged. @masarunagai. We should all learn from each other. Thanks, @kaerunantoka for pointing all to a serious issue, we should all consider it.
", "rawMarkdown": "Good step a copied notebook is deleted and also acknowledged. @masarunagai. We should all learn from each other. Thanks, @kaerunantoka for pointing all to a serious issue, we should all consider it.", "votes": 8 } ] }, { "id": 1768517, "postDate": "2022-04-26T11:14:30.560Z", "content": "Agree with you, a gold medal notebook should be original.
", "rawMarkdown": "Agree with you, a gold medal notebook should be original.", "votes": 6 }, { "id": 1768222, "postDate": "2022-04-26T04:35:18.313Z", "content": "As far as I am concerned, it should be reasonable to apply the practice of cross refence/citation when we borrow wisdom from others.
\nAfter all, the original kernel creators should take the most credits.
\nMaybe a little way too academic? Lol.
I support you. we should respect every original author!
", "rawMarkdown": "I support you. we should respect every original author!", "votes": 4 }, { "id": 1779007, "postDate": "2022-05-06T02:02:26.980Z", "content": "Agreed. Thank you for sharing the notebook.
", "rawMarkdown": "Agreed. Thank you for sharing the notebook.", "votes": 3 }, { "id": 1768263, "postDate": "2022-04-26T05:33:41.340Z", "content": "I agree that plagiarism is not acceptable. It is not conducive to a positive environment, is detrimental to the community, and should be discouraged. Thinking and coming up with unique work is hard work and having someone straight up copying your work and receiving all the benefits without any regard for recognition of the original source is pretty infuriating. That said, I believe our open source world offers wonderful opportunities to learn and improve which involves building on top of what others have done before us; however, best efforts should be put towards giving credit where credit is due. I think this spirit helps the community grow and fosters a better environment where we can and add to the development ourselves and others.
", "rawMarkdown": "I agree that plagiarism is not acceptable. It is not conducive to a positive environment, is detrimental to the community, and should be discouraged. Thinking and coming up with unique work is hard work and having someone straight up copying your work and receiving all the benefits without any regard for recognition of the original source is pretty infuriating. That said, I believe our open source world offers wonderful opportunities to learn and improve which involves building on top of what others have done before us; however, best efforts should be put towards giving credit where credit is due. I think this spirit helps the community grow and fosters a better environment where we can and add to the development ourselves and others.", "votes": 3 }, { "id": 1768018, "postDate": "2022-04-25T22:19:03.683Z", "content": "Speaking of which,
\nyour notebook borrows a lot of code from https://github.com/Ajax0564/Birdcall-Sound-Event-Detection/ without citation
Thank you for calling this out @kaerunantoka
\nThis is a platform that gives aspiring and seasoned data scientists an opportunity to learn and contribute original work. Its surprising to see how people who copy don't understand this. They are the losers in all of this, losing their integrity and most of all a chance to learn and contribute.
will report if see plagiarism. Good.
", "rawMarkdown": "will report if see plagiarism. Good. ", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1775718, "postDate": "2022-05-03T10:04:18.423Z", "content": "sure will report
", "rawMarkdown": "sure will report", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1774861, "postDate": "2022-05-02T14:14:53.847Z", "content": "Agreed. it's a fact
", "rawMarkdown": "Agreed. it's a fact", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1774638, "postDate": "2022-05-02T10:48:56.600Z", "content": "That's right, it's unacceptable.
", "rawMarkdown": "That's right, it's unacceptable.", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1774525, "postDate": "2022-05-02T08:39:36.773Z", "content": "This is a great post. I completely agree - it's important to call out plagiarism and cheating.
", "rawMarkdown": "This is a great post. I completely agree - it's important to call out plagiarism and cheating.", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1774094, "postDate": "2022-05-01T20:20:22.123Z", "content": "good job! Wii do that soon
", "rawMarkdown": "good job! Wii do that soon", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1774034, "postDate": "2022-05-01T18:11:00.563Z", "content": "Agreed, will report if I see plagiarism.
", "rawMarkdown": "Agreed, will report if I see plagiarism.\n\n", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1773406, "postDate": "2022-05-01T06:11:35.150Z", "content": "copletely agreed
", "rawMarkdown": "copletely agreed", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1771936, "postDate": "2022-04-29T16:57:42.750Z", "content": "This will always be a problem with communities that share so willingly. Collaboration is great for growth, but in this industry its very easy to take the ideas of others and call them your own.
", "rawMarkdown": "This will always be a problem with communities that share so willingly. Collaboration is great for growth, but in this industry its very easy to take the ideas of others and call them your own.", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1771364, "postDate": "2022-04-29T06:38:07.977Z", "content": "Good Job @kaerunantoka
", "rawMarkdown": "Good Job @kaerunantoka ", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1770983, "postDate": "2022-04-28T19:46:09.873Z", "content": "시체매가 많이 꼬이는구나
", "rawMarkdown": "시체매가 많이 꼬이는구나", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1770945, "postDate": "2022-04-28T18:51:31.997Z", "content": "Hi kaerururu! I want to customize your notebook so that it works on TPU. I copied a notebook from one of the ones you specified (currently unavailable). I gave a link to your notebook. I thought it would be great for the model to train on TPU, but I had a problem, so I published this notebook with an error.
", "rawMarkdown": "Hi kaerururu! I want to customize your notebook so that it works on TPU. I copied a notebook from one of the ones you specified (currently unavailable). I gave a link to your notebook. I thought it would be great for the model to train on TPU, but I had a problem, so I published this notebook with an error.", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1770189, "postDate": "2022-04-28T04:30:39.870Z", "content": "These guys are thieves! Shame on them.
", "rawMarkdown": "These guys are thieves! Shame on them.", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1769590, "postDate": "2022-04-27T12:26:01.057Z", "content": "Maybe its time to ask the community.
\nI have this notebook:
\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/lszlbebesi/classification-with-ensemble-and-900-features
\nClearly I tried to do this challenge on my own, but I was looking at the work of other, so I ended up borrowing an idea from another notebook, and some ideas from two tutorials…
\nI cited these in the end of the notebook (acknowledgement), TBH I haven't really checked Kaggle's internal rules about this…
\nDo You think this is acceptable, or should I modify the citations?
Thank you!
", "rawMarkdown": "Maybe its time to ask the community.\n\nI have this notebook: \nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/lszlbebesi/classification-with-ensemble-and-900-features\nClearly I tried to do this challenge on my own, but I was looking at the work of other, so I ended up borrowing an idea from another notebook, and some ideas from two tutorials... \nI cited these in the end of the notebook (acknowledgement), TBH I haven't really checked Kaggle's internal rules about this...\nDo You think this is acceptable, or should I modify the citations?\n\nThank you!", "votes": 1 }, { "id": 1772840, "postDate": "2022-04-30T15:56:19.200Z", "content": "Agreed, will report if I see plagiarism.
", "rawMarkdown": "Agreed, will report if I see plagiarism.", "votes": 2 }, { "id": 1769178, "postDate": "2022-04-27T03:07:29.673Z", "content": "I support your opinion. Gold-medal submission should be original, and creator should be evaluated with fair.
", "rawMarkdown": "I support your opinion. Gold-medal submission should be original, and creator should be evaluated with fair. ", "votes": 2 }, { "id": 1780126, "postDate": "2022-05-07T05:36:09.490Z", "content": "Cannot agree with you more
", "rawMarkdown": "Cannot agree with you more", "votes": -1 }, { "id": 1769798, "postDate": "2022-04-27T15:46:02.860Z", "content": "as long as notebook is referred, I don't think that is plagiarism.
", "rawMarkdown": "as long as notebook is referred, I don't think that is plagiarism.", "votes": -2, "replies": [ { "id": 1773872, "postDate": "2022-05-01T14:38:36.427Z", "content": "The meaning of \"plagiarism\" by kaerunantoka seems different from the normal meaning of \"plagiarism\" in English.
\nHi @kaerunantoka, I suggest editing the topic comment as follows:
\nKaggle calls that plagiarism
", "rawMarkdown": "Kaggle calls that plagiarism" }, { "id": 1774613, "postDate": "2022-05-02T10:05:29.100Z", "content": "\n\nKaggle calls that plagiarism
\n
To avoid vague discussions, I would be grateful if you could clarify what \"that\" refers to.
", "rawMarkdown": "> Kaggle calls that plagiarism\n\nTo avoid vague discussions, I would be grateful if you could clarify what \"that\" refers to.", "votes": -2 }, { "id": 1778651, "postDate": "2022-05-05T14:57:11.017Z", "content": "According to Wikipedia[1], the meaning of \"plagiarism\" in academic circles appears to be a term that applies to a very wide range of situations (see \"Forms of academic plagiarism\" entry).
\nI am not a native speaker, so I don't know how strong a condemnation the nuance of the word can have, but judging from this material, I would think that the situation in question fits into this list of situations, so using the word \"plagiarism\" is not otherwise inappropriate, is it?
Also, this is my personal opinion, but I think the purpose of this discussion is to raise issues about the reliability and quality of the content produced by the Kaggle community, and I don't think it is essential to focus too much attention on the usage of a single word.
\n…………….
", "rawMarkdown": "................", "votes": -1 }, { "id": 1772542, "postDate": "2022-04-30T10:49:05.670Z", "content": "emmmm…..
", "rawMarkdown": "emmmm.....", "votes": -2 }, { "id": 1779757, "postDate": "2022-05-06T19:50:07.210Z", "content": "I agree with you and hope your work gets recognized.
", "rawMarkdown": "I agree with you and hope your work gets recognized." }, { "id": 1771629, "postDate": "2022-04-29T12:23:05.587Z", "rawMarkdown": "", "isDeleted": true }, { "id": 1769433, "postDate": "2022-04-27T09:00:12.243Z", "rawMarkdown": "", "isDeleted": true, "replies": [ { "id": 1769530, "postDate": "2022-04-27T11:01:59.393Z", "content": "Maybe it's time to restore the notebook's down vote option
", "rawMarkdown": "Maybe it's time to restore the notebook's down vote option", "votes": 1 } ] }, { "id": 1769184, "postDate": "2022-04-27T03:51:20.003Z", "rawMarkdown": "", "votes": -54, "isDeleted": true, "replies": [ { "id": 1769338, "postDate": "2022-04-27T06:58:37.863Z", "content": "reported😄👍
", "rawMarkdown": "reported😄👍", "votes": 15 } ] }, { "id": 1768086, "postDate": "2022-04-26T00:54:49.413Z", "rawMarkdown": "", "votes": -22, "isDeleted": true, "replies": [ { "id": 1768094, "postDate": "2022-04-26T01:20:18.873Z", "content": "I agree with your opinion that these copies are not cheating \"in rule\" because my codes are released under the Apache 2.0 open source license.
\nDid you read these copied notebooks ?
\nNo additional information in these copies. Just copy and pasted (and few japanese joke).
\nIf these works are forgiven, no one will publish their codes at all.
", "rawMarkdown": "I agree with your opinion that these copies are not cheating \"in rule\" because my codes are released under the Apache 2.0 open source license.\n\nDid you read these copied notebooks ?\n\nNo additional information in these copies. Just copy and pasted (and few japanese joke).\n\nIf these works are forgiven, no one will publish their codes at all.", "votes": 12 }, { "id": 1768102, "postDate": "2022-04-26T01:47:27.470Z", "content": "@shinya7y Can you explain the meaning of Plagiarism/copied content that is not meaningfully different to us?
\nFYI, you can see this from report notebook. If you're right, there is no plagiarism here 😄
Perhaps you recognize plagiarism under Community Guidelines as plagiarism under Apach 2.0.
\nThe Community Guidelines prohibit plagiarism as follows. However, plagiarism here does not mean plagiarism under Apache 2.0.
\n\n\nDon’t try to manipulate the progression system.
\n
\n Progression manipulation includes any behaviors that intend to game Kaggle’s reputation system. They harm the fairness and quality of the community and are forbidden on our platform. Off-topic self promotion, upvote collusion, plagiarism, and cheating are some (but not all) examples of progression manipulation.
Also, since the Community Guidelines do not explicitly state the criteria for plagiarism, I see nothing wrong with the step of reporting and asking Kaggle team to make a decision.
", "rawMarkdown": "Perhaps you recognize plagiarism under **Community Guidelines** as plagiarism under **Apach 2.0**.\n\nThe [Community Guidelines](https://www.kaggle.com/community-guidelines) prohibit plagiarism as follows. However, plagiarism here does not mean plagiarism under Apache 2.0.\n\n> Don’t try to manipulate the progression system.\nProgression manipulation includes any behaviors that intend to game Kaggle’s reputation system. They harm the fairness and quality of the community and are forbidden on our platform. Off-topic self promotion, upvote collusion, plagiarism, and cheating are some (but not all) examples of progression manipulation.\n\nAlso, since the Community Guidelines do not explicitly state the criteria for plagiarism, I see nothing wrong with the step of reporting and asking Kaggle team to make a decision.", "votes": 13 }, { "id": 1768179, "postDate": "2022-04-26T03:41:37.643Z", "content": "I agree with fam_taro-san's opinion. Hope kaggle team make a decision on this issue!
", "rawMarkdown": "I agree with fam_taro-san's opinion. Hope kaggle team make a decision on this issue!", "votes": 2 }, { "id": 1768283, "postDate": "2022-04-26T06:10:18.740Z", "content": "@kaerunantoka
\nI disagree with the offensive words, not your whole opinion.
\nI also think it would be better if such notebooks didn't exist.
@onodera @yukkyo
\nThank you for letting me know and reminding the usage of \"plagiarism\" on Kaggle.
\nTo my current understanding, \"report plagiarism\" means \"report notebooks with the option Plagiarism/copied content that is not meaningfully different\", and \"plagiarism\" on Kaggle doesn't necessarily mean \"pretending that it is your own\" https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/plagiarism .
Thanks. Will do.
", "rawMarkdown": "Thanks. Will do.", "votes": 1 } ], "comments": [ { "id": 1767991, "author_name": "Node", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-25T21:12:43.573000", "content": "Thank you for sharing your opinion, I was thinking the same thing.
\nIn addition, I think those notebooks are unuseful in that they are written in Japanese, and also nonsense in that they are using Japanese inside joke = Yukkuri Jikkyou; contents frequently used in Japanese Youtube channel.
\nFor sure, Notebooks and Discussion written in our mother's tongue is easy to read, but they may interrupt the role of
\ninformation exchange. (So I'm writing discussion in my poor English like this comment.)
I think Notebook downvote should be introduced.
", "votes": 15, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1768982, "author_name": "MD. Kawsar Ahmad", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T20:21:02.720000", "content": "i agree with you..it's a fact
", "votes": 8, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1769423, "author_name": "Mass", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T08:51:51.007000", "content": "Apologize to every participant.
\nI deleted my last post, since I realized how rude I was and what a wrong mindset I had.
I would like to apologize to the original contributor as soon as possible.
\nkaerunantoka -san
\nFirst of all, let me apologize to you sincerely.
\nI changed my own mindset after I looked at my post again, and receive advices from my friends who watches the discussion.
First, it was absolutely wrong that I disregarded your will.
\nWhen discussing about reuse of someone's contribution, we must firstly consider well about the will of the person who originally contributed the community .
\nSecond, I rudely mention about your kindly-provided codes.
\nLast, I was too careless about your huge efforts, that you managed to get time from your real and private life.
Above all, my biggest misunderstanding was that I forgot thankfulness for the voluntary contributions from the great participants.
\nI'm shame for myself, sorry.
\n(I'm sorry that I formerly wrote this part in Non-English)
It is not the matter what I thought.
\nThe matter is that the notebook broke Community Guidelines.
In addition, we have better use English in English community…
\n(No need to write Japanese together…)
I'm glad to know someone took the initiative to delete the plagiarism notebook. upvote for you two
", "votes": 6, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1769473, "author_name": "Mass", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T09:43:54.083000", "content": "@kaerunantoka
\nI regret for lack of my understandings. I shall study Community Guidelines so that I can follow it myself.
I understand writing in Japanese is a wrong manner, too. Again I realized I had better learn from others' behaviors more carefully. I'll repair the post above into English later.
\nMany thanks, for both your contribution and your reply. And sorry again from the bottom of my heart.
", "votes": 6, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1769500, "author_name": "Muhammed Tausif", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T10:21:30.427000", "content": "Good step a copied notebook is deleted and also acknowledged. @masarunagai. We should all learn from each other. Thanks, @kaerunantoka for pointing all to a serious issue, we should all consider it.
", "votes": 8, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 1768517, "author_name": "Dewei Chen", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T11:14:30.560000", "content": "Agree with you, a gold medal notebook should be original.
", "votes": 6, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1768222, "author_name": "LittleChika", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T04:35:18.313000", "content": "As far as I am concerned, it should be reasonable to apply the practice of cross refence/citation when we borrow wisdom from others.
\nAfter all, the original kernel creators should take the most credits.
\nMaybe a little way too academic? Lol.
I support you. we should respect every original author!
", "votes": 4, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1779007, "author_name": "Kz", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-06T02:02:26.980000", "content": "Agreed. Thank you for sharing the notebook.
", "votes": 3, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1768263, "author_name": "Kevin Kwan", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T05:33:41.340000", "content": "I agree that plagiarism is not acceptable. It is not conducive to a positive environment, is detrimental to the community, and should be discouraged. Thinking and coming up with unique work is hard work and having someone straight up copying your work and receiving all the benefits without any regard for recognition of the original source is pretty infuriating. That said, I believe our open source world offers wonderful opportunities to learn and improve which involves building on top of what others have done before us; however, best efforts should be put towards giving credit where credit is due. I think this spirit helps the community grow and fosters a better environment where we can and add to the development ourselves and others.
", "votes": 3, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1768018, "author_name": "Sherman", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-25T22:19:03.683000", "content": "Speaking of which,
\nyour notebook borrows a lot of code from https://github.com/Ajax0564/Birdcall-Sound-Event-Detection/ without citation
Thank you for calling this out @kaerunantoka
\nThis is a platform that gives aspiring and seasoned data scientists an opportunity to learn and contribute original work. Its surprising to see how people who copy don't understand this. They are the losers in all of this, losing their integrity and most of all a chance to learn and contribute.
will report if see plagiarism. Good.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1775718, "author_name": "Shubham Aggarwal", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-03T10:04:18.423000", "content": "sure will report
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1774861, "author_name": "Sahar Saber", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-02T14:14:53.847000", "content": "Agreed. it's a fact
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1774638, "author_name": "Cartaphilus13", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-02T10:48:56.600000", "content": "That's right, it's unacceptable.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1774525, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-02T08:39:36.773000", "content": "This is a great post. I completely agree - it's important to call out plagiarism and cheating.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1774094, "author_name": "qingyuan1016", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-01T20:20:22.123000", "content": "good job! Wii do that soon
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1774034, "author_name": "amr abowady", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-01T18:11:00.563000", "content": "Agreed, will report if I see plagiarism.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1773406, "author_name": "HZSEP", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-01T06:11:35.150000", "content": "copletely agreed
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1771936, "author_name": "Frank Mara", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-29T16:57:42.750000", "content": "This will always be a problem with communities that share so willingly. Collaboration is great for growth, but in this industry its very easy to take the ideas of others and call them your own.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1771364, "author_name": "Hassan Shehzad", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-29T06:38:07.977000", "content": "Good Job @kaerunantoka
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1770983, "author_name": "Minsu Koh", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-28T19:46:09.873000", "content": "시체매가 많이 꼬이는구나
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1770945, "author_name": "Andrij", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-28T18:51:31.997000", "content": "Hi kaerururu! I want to customize your notebook so that it works on TPU. I copied a notebook from one of the ones you specified (currently unavailable). I gave a link to your notebook. I thought it would be great for the model to train on TPU, but I had a problem, so I published this notebook with an error.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1770189, "author_name": "Brad156", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-28T04:30:39.870000", "content": "These guys are thieves! Shame on them.
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1769590, "author_name": "László Bebesi", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T12:26:01.057000", "content": "Maybe its time to ask the community.
\nI have this notebook:
\nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/lszlbebesi/classification-with-ensemble-and-900-features
\nClearly I tried to do this challenge on my own, but I was looking at the work of other, so I ended up borrowing an idea from another notebook, and some ideas from two tutorials…
\nI cited these in the end of the notebook (acknowledgement), TBH I haven't really checked Kaggle's internal rules about this…
\nDo You think this is acceptable, or should I modify the citations?
Thank you!
", "votes": 1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1772840, "author_name": "💥Alien💥", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-30T15:56:19.200000", "content": "Agreed, will report if I see plagiarism.
", "votes": 2, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1769178, "author_name": "Aisu Takida", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T03:07:29.673000", "content": "I support your opinion. Gold-medal submission should be original, and creator should be evaluated with fair.
", "votes": 2, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1780126, "author_name": "Zelin", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-07T05:36:09.490000", "content": "Cannot agree with you more
", "votes": -1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1769798, "author_name": "dragon zhang", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T15:46:02.860000", "content": "as long as notebook is referred, I don't think that is plagiarism.
", "votes": -2, "replies": [ { "id": 1773872, "author_name": "Yosuke Shinya", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-01T14:38:36.427000", "content": "The meaning of \"plagiarism\" by kaerunantoka seems different from the normal meaning of \"plagiarism\" in English.
\nHi @kaerunantoka, I suggest editing the topic comment as follows:
\nKaggle calls that plagiarism
", "votes": 0, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1774613, "author_name": "Yosuke Shinya", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-02T10:05:29.100000", "content": "\n\nKaggle calls that plagiarism
\n
To avoid vague discussions, I would be grateful if you could clarify what \"that\" refers to.
", "votes": -2, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1778651, "author_name": "Bilzard", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-05T14:57:11.017000", "content": "According to Wikipedia[1], the meaning of \"plagiarism\" in academic circles appears to be a term that applies to a very wide range of situations (see \"Forms of academic plagiarism\" entry).
\nI am not a native speaker, so I don't know how strong a condemnation the nuance of the word can have, but judging from this material, I would think that the situation in question fits into this list of situations, so using the word \"plagiarism\" is not otherwise inappropriate, is it?
Also, this is my personal opinion, but I think the purpose of this discussion is to raise issues about the reliability and quality of the content produced by the Kaggle community, and I don't think it is essential to focus too much attention on the usage of a single word.
\n…………….
", "votes": -1, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1772542, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-30T10:49:05.670000", "content": "", "votes": -2, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1779757, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-06T19:50:07.210000", "content": "", "votes": 0, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1771629, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-29T12:23:05.587000", "content": "", "votes": 0, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1769433, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T09:00:12.243000", "content": "", "votes": 0, "replies": [ { "id": 1769530, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T11:01:59.393000", "content": "", "votes": 1, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 1769184, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T03:51:20.003000", "content": "", "votes": -54, "replies": [ { "id": 1769338, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-27T06:58:37.863000", "content": "", "votes": 15, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 1768086, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T00:54:49.413000", "content": "", "votes": -22, "replies": [ { "id": 1768094, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T01:20:18.873000", "content": "", "votes": 12, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1768102, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T01:47:27.470000", "content": "", "votes": 12, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1768121, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T02:21:26.157000", "content": "", "votes": 13, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1768179, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T03:41:37.643000", "content": "", "votes": 2, "replies": [] }, { "id": 1768283, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-04-26T06:10:18.740000", "content": "", "votes": 1, "replies": [] } ] }, { "id": 1777898, "author_name": "", "author_url": "", "post_date": "2022-05-04T22:04:09.627000", "content": "", "votes": 1, "replies": [] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "1767655": "These copy and pasted notebooks are available, which are plagiarism of my notebooks I published.\n\n[This](https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-kaerururu-s-infer-addtest) even wrote in the title that it is a copy of mine.\n\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-kaerururu-s-infer-addtest\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/pixyz0130/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f1\n・https://www.kaggle.com/code/lunapandachan/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f2\n\n\nI spent a lot of ideas (some borrowed from past competitions) and time creating my original notebooks ([train fold0](https://www.kaggle.com/code/kaerunantoka/birdclef2022-use-2nd-label-f0), [inference](https://www.kaggle.com/code/kaerunantoka/birdclef2022-ex005-f0-infer)).\n\nIt's sad that these copy and pasted notebooks earn a lot of upvotes with less effort.\n\nAlso, The more notebooks which have no new ideas , the harder it is to find notebooks which have new ideas.\n\nWe should not make kaggle a place where people who cheat like this can get benefit.\n\nNo one will share their knowledge, if such people increase and these cheating are allowed.\n\nIf you agree, please report them.", "1767991": "Thank you for sharing your opinion, I was thinking the same thing.\n\nIn addition, I think those notebooks are unuseful in that they are written in Japanese, and also nonsense in that they are using Japanese inside joke = Yukkuri Jikkyou; contents frequently used in Japanese Youtube channel.\n\nFor sure, Notebooks and Discussion written in our mother's tongue is easy to read, but they may interrupt the role of \ninformation exchange. (So I'm writing discussion in my poor English like this comment.)\n\nI think Notebook downvote should be introduced.", "1768982": "i agree with you..it's a fact", "1769423": "Apologize to every participant.\nI deleted my last post, since I realized how rude I was and what a wrong mindset I had.\n\nI would like to apologize to the original contributor as soon as possible.\n\nkaerunantoka -san\n\nFirst of all, let me apologize to you sincerely.\nI changed my own mindset after I looked at my post again, and receive advices from my friends who watches the discussion.\n\nFirst, it was absolutely wrong that I disregarded your will.\nWhen discussing about reuse of someone's contribution, we must firstly consider well about the will of the person who originally contributed the community .\nSecond, I rudely mention about your kindly-provided codes.\nLast, I was too careless about your huge efforts, that you managed to get time from your real and private life.\n\nAbove all, my biggest misunderstanding was that I forgot thankfulness for the voluntary contributions from the great participants.\nI'm shame for myself, sorry.\n(I'm sorry that I formerly wrote this part in Non-English)", "1768517": "Agree with you, a gold medal notebook should be original.", "1768222": "As far as I am concerned, it should be reasonable to apply the practice of cross refence/citation when we borrow wisdom from others.\nAfter all, the original kernel creators should take the most credits.\nMaybe a little way too academic? Lol.", "1767744": "I support you. we should respect every original author!", "1779007": "Agreed. Thank you for sharing the notebook.", "1768263": "I agree that plagiarism is not acceptable. It is not conducive to a positive environment, is detrimental to the community, and should be discouraged. Thinking and coming up with unique work is hard work and having someone straight up copying your work and receiving all the benefits without any regard for recognition of the original source is pretty infuriating. That said, I believe our open source world offers wonderful opportunities to learn and improve which involves building on top of what others have done before us; however, best efforts should be put towards giving credit where credit is due. I think this spirit helps the community grow and fosters a better environment where we can and add to the development ourselves and others.", "1768018": "Speaking of which, \nyour notebook borrows a lot of code from https://github.com/Ajax0564/Birdcall-Sound-Event-Detection/ without citation", "1777363": "Thank you for calling this out @kaerunantoka \nThis is a platform that gives aspiring and seasoned data scientists an opportunity to learn and contribute original work. Its surprising to see how people who copy don't understand this. They are the losers in all of this, losing their integrity and most of all a chance to learn and contribute. ", "1775960": "will report if see plagiarism. Good. ", "1775718": "sure will report", "1774861": "Agreed. it's a fact", "1774638": "That's right, it's unacceptable.", "1774525": "This is a great post. I completely agree - it's important to call out plagiarism and cheating.", "1774094": "good job! Wii do that soon", "1774034": "Agreed, will report if I see plagiarism.\n\n", "1773406": "copletely agreed", "1771936": "This will always be a problem with communities that share so willingly. Collaboration is great for growth, but in this industry its very easy to take the ideas of others and call them your own.", "1771364": "Good Job @kaerunantoka ", "1770983": "시체매가 많이 꼬이는구나", "1770945": "Hi kaerururu! I want to customize your notebook so that it works on TPU. I copied a notebook from one of the ones you specified (currently unavailable). I gave a link to your notebook. I thought it would be great for the model to train on TPU, but I had a problem, so I published this notebook with an error.", "1770189": "These guys are thieves! Shame on them.", "1769590": "Maybe its time to ask the community.\n\nI have this notebook: \nhttps://www.kaggle.com/code/lszlbebesi/classification-with-ensemble-and-900-features\nClearly I tried to do this challenge on my own, but I was looking at the work of other, so I ended up borrowing an idea from another notebook, and some ideas from two tutorials... \nI cited these in the end of the notebook (acknowledgement), TBH I haven't really checked Kaggle's internal rules about this...\nDo You think this is acceptable, or should I modify the citations?\n\nThank you!", "1772840": "Agreed, will report if I see plagiarism.", "1769178": "I support your opinion. Gold-medal submission should be original, and creator should be evaluated with fair. ", "1780126": "Cannot agree with you more", "1769798": "as long as notebook is referred, I don't think that is plagiarism.", "1772789": "................", "1772542": "emmmm.....", "1779757": "I agree with you and hope your work gets recognized.", "1771629": "", "1769433": "", "1769184": "", "1768086": "", "1777898": "Thanks. Will do." } }