The public 0.799 score spoiled this competition so bad, it turns out that score gives good results on the private lb as well so the difference between the top 1 and the first no medal place is less than 0.3% which is totally irrelevant in the real world of credit risk modelling. Apart from that, the competition was nice but I am glad it is over now and I won't waste my time trying to get a 0.00001 score boost, hopefully the kaggle team will notice that and try to improve the next non Code Competition to avoid such things.
\nCongratulations to the winners!
", "messages": [ { "id": "1912739", "postDate": "08/25/2022 00:26:41", "content": "The public 0.799 score spoiled this competition so bad, it turns out that score gives good results on the private lb as well so the difference between the top 1 and the first no medal place is less than 0.3% which is totally irrelevant in the real world of credit risk modelling. Apart from that, the competition was nice but I am glad it is over now and I won't waste my time trying to get a 0.00001 score boost, hopefully the kaggle team will notice that and try to improve the next non Code Competition to avoid such things.
\nCongratulations to the winners!
", "rawMarkdown": "The public 0.799 score spoiled this competition so bad, it turns out that score gives good results on the private lb as well so the difference between the top 1 and the first no medal place is less than 0.3% which is totally irrelevant in the real world of credit risk modelling. Apart from that, the competition was nice but I am glad it is over now and I won't waste my time trying to get a 0.00001 score boost, hopefully the kaggle team will notice that and try to improve the next non Code Competition to avoid such things.\n\nCongratulations to the winners!", "votes": null }, { "id": "1922293", "postDate": "09/01/2022 11:47:27", "content": "Hello @pabuoro. May I invite you to participate in this survey regarding your experience on Kaggle (10 min)? This is not a scam. We are a group of researchers at the City University of Hong Kong. The survey link is: https://cityuhk.questionpro.com/survey-of-kaggle-contestants
", "rawMarkdown": "Hello @pabuoro. May I invite you to participate in this survey regarding your experience on Kaggle (10 min)? This is not a scam. We are a group of researchers at the City University of Hong Kong. The survey link is: https://cityuhk.questionpro.com/survey-of-kaggle-contestants", "votes": null } ], "comments": [ { "id": 1922293, "author_name": "lystriving", "author_url": "", "post_date": "09/01/2022 11:47:27", "content": "Hello @pabuoro. May I invite you to participate in this survey regarding your experience on Kaggle (10 min)? This is not a scam. We are a group of researchers at the City University of Hong Kong. The survey link is: https://cityuhk.questionpro.com/survey-of-kaggle-contestants
", "votes": null, "replies": [] } ], "raw_markdown_by_id": { "1912739": "The public 0.799 score spoiled this competition so bad, it turns out that score gives good results on the private lb as well so the difference between the top 1 and the first no medal place is less than 0.3% which is totally irrelevant in the real world of credit risk modelling. Apart from that, the competition was nice but I am glad it is over now and I won't waste my time trying to get a 0.00001 score boost, hopefully the kaggle team will notice that and try to improve the next non Code Competition to avoid such things.\n\nCongratulations to the winners!", "1922293": "Hello @pabuoro. May I invite you to participate in this survey regarding your experience on Kaggle (10 min)? This is not a scam. We are a group of researchers at the City University of Hong Kong. The survey link is: https://cityuhk.questionpro.com/survey-of-kaggle-contestants" }, "source": "meta" }