{
  "id": 1412,
  "title": "Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?",
  "url": "/competitions/GestureChallenge/discussion/1412",
  "author_name": "",
  "post_date": "2012-02-29T20:09:43.277Z",
  "votes": null,
  "comment_count": 5,
  "views": 2810,
  "content": "<p>Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?</p>",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "8759",
      "postDate": "02/29/2012 20:09:43",
      "content": "<p>Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "8790",
      "postDate": "03/01/2012 21:22:20",
      "content": "<p>[quote=Manavender;8759]</p>\r\n<p>Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>Certainly. We will let the reviewers know that the final results are not available yet. We might be able to let you insert the final results in the paper because the camera ready copy must be turned in a little later than we thought.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "8797",
      "postDate": "03/01/2012 22:26:18",
      "content": "<p>Isn't the paper double blind ? If we report the results, we will be revealing our identity. I am not sure how to resolve this ?&nbsp;</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "8903",
      "postDate": "03/02/2012 21:56:10",
      "content": "<p>[quote=Isabelle;8790]</p>\r\n<p>[quote=Manavender;8759]</p>\r\n<p>Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>Certainly. We will let the reviewers know that the final results are not available yet. We might be able to let you insert the final results in the paper because the camera ready copy must be turned in a little later than we thought.</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>No, for the workshops there is no double blind review. The participants may hide their identity in their paper if they want to, but they are not obliged. I think it is a good idea to report results.</p>\r\n<p>IMPORTANT: There is no automatic acceptance. The papers are peer reviewed. Good ranking in the challenge is only one of the criteria. The papers must also be technically sound and well written. It is recommended to compare methods and to give methodological\r\n insights rather than just describe what you tried chronologically.</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "8904",
      "postDate": "03/02/2012 22:27:09",
      "content": "<p>[quote=ChallengeAdmin;8903]</p>\r\n<p>[quote=Isabelle;8790]</p>\r\n<p>[quote=Manavender;8759]</p>\r\n<p>Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>Certainly. We will let the reviewers know that the final results are not available yet. We might be able to let you insert the final results in the paper because the camera ready copy must be turned in a little later than we thought.</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>No, for the workshops there is no double blind review. The participants may hide their identity in their paper if they want to, but they are not obliged. I think it is a good idea to report results.</p>\r\n<p>IMPORTANT: There is no automatic acceptance. The papers are peer reviewed. Good ranking in the challenge is only one of the criteria. The papers must also be technically sound and well written. It is recommended to compare methods and to give methodological\r\n insights rather than just describe what you tried chronologically.</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<pre>And I forgot to say:<br>There will be a ** best paper award ** and a ** best student paper award ** offered by Pascal2, each of 200 Euros.<br>The attribution of these awards will be made by the committee, based on the peer review of the paper. The review criteria are:<br>==&gt; Relevance: address gesture recognition problems<br>==&gt; Usefulness: solve the problem in a satisfactory way<br>==&gt; Novelty/originality: this criterion will be sightly de-emphasize for high ranking participants in the challenge<br>==&gt; Sanity: comparisons with other methods, principled methods, good experimental design, correct derivations/proof, good references<br>==&gt; Presentation: well written paper, good organization, tables, figures.</pre>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    },
    {
      "id": "9056",
      "postDate": "03/05/2012 23:45:00",
      "content": "<p>Hello,</p>\r\n<p>Regarding to the workshop submission, is there any proper citation for the baseline algorithm provided by Kaggle? Thanks</p>",
      "rawMarkdown": "",
      "votes": null
    }
  ],
  "comments": [
    {
      "id": 8790,
      "author_name": "iguyon",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "03/01/2012 21:22:20",
      "content": "<p>[quote=Manavender;8759]</p>\r\n<p>Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>Certainly. We will let the reviewers know that the final results are not available yet. We might be able to let you insert the final results in the paper because the camera ready copy must be turned in a little later than we thought.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 8797,
      "author_name": "mrkaggler",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "03/01/2012 22:26:18",
      "content": "<p>Isn't the paper double blind ? If we report the results, we will be revealing our identity. I am not sure how to resolve this ?&nbsp;</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 8903,
      "author_name": "challengeadmin",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "03/02/2012 21:56:10",
      "content": "<p>[quote=Isabelle;8790]</p>\r\n<p>[quote=Manavender;8759]</p>\r\n<p>Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>Certainly. We will let the reviewers know that the final results are not available yet. We might be able to let you insert the final results in the paper because the camera ready copy must be turned in a little later than we thought.</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>No, for the workshops there is no double blind review. The participants may hide their identity in their paper if they want to, but they are not obliged. I think it is a good idea to report results.</p>\r\n<p>IMPORTANT: There is no automatic acceptance. The papers are peer reviewed. Good ranking in the challenge is only one of the criteria. The papers must also be technically sound and well written. It is recommended to compare methods and to give methodological\r\n insights rather than just describe what you tried chronologically.</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 8904,
      "author_name": "challengeadmin",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "03/02/2012 22:27:09",
      "content": "<p>[quote=ChallengeAdmin;8903]</p>\r\n<p>[quote=Isabelle;8790]</p>\r\n<p>[quote=Manavender;8759]</p>\r\n<p>Can we report results of validation set in the paper to CVPR2012 workshop ?</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>Certainly. We will let the reviewers know that the final results are not available yet. We might be able to let you insert the final results in the paper because the camera ready copy must be turned in a little later than we thought.</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<p>No, for the workshops there is no double blind review. The participants may hide their identity in their paper if they want to, but they are not obliged. I think it is a good idea to report results.</p>\r\n<p>IMPORTANT: There is no automatic acceptance. The papers are peer reviewed. Good ranking in the challenge is only one of the criteria. The papers must also be technically sound and well written. It is recommended to compare methods and to give methodological\r\n insights rather than just describe what you tried chronologically.</p>\r\n<p>[/quote]</p>\r\n<pre>And I forgot to say:<br>There will be a ** best paper award ** and a ** best student paper award ** offered by Pascal2, each of 200 Euros.<br>The attribution of these awards will be made by the committee, based on the peer review of the paper. The review criteria are:<br>==&gt; Relevance: address gesture recognition problems<br>==&gt; Usefulness: solve the problem in a satisfactory way<br>==&gt; Novelty/originality: this criterion will be sightly de-emphasize for high ranking participants in the challenge<br>==&gt; Sanity: comparisons with other methods, principled methods, good experimental design, correct derivations/proof, good references<br>==&gt; Presentation: well written paper, good organization, tables, figures.</pre>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    },
    {
      "id": 9056,
      "author_name": "zonga28186",
      "author_url": "",
      "post_date": "03/05/2012 23:45:00",
      "content": "<p>Hello,</p>\r\n<p>Regarding to the workshop submission, is there any proper citation for the baseline algorithm provided by Kaggle? Thanks</p>",
      "votes": null,
      "replies": []
    }
  ],
  "raw_markdown_by_id": {
    "8759": "",
    "8790": "",
    "8797": "",
    "8903": "",
    "8904": "",
    "9056": ""
  },
  "source": "meta"
}